These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33862032)

  • 1. Smoking behavior in 18-20 year-olds after tobacco 21 policy implementation in California: A difference-in-differences analysis with other states.
    Dove MS; Stewart SL; Tong EK
    Prev Med; 2021 Jul; 148():106553. PubMed ID: 33862032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. E-cigarette and cigarette purchasing among young adults before and after implementation of California's tobacco 21 policy.
    Schiff S; Liu F; Cruz TB; Unger JB; Cwalina S; Leventhal A; McConnell R; Barrington-Trimis J
    Tob Control; 2021 Mar; 30(2):206-211. PubMed ID: 32108084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Associations of California's Tobacco 21 Minimum Sales Age Law with Tobacco Use Among Sexual Minority Adolescents: A Trends Analysis.
    García-Ramírez G; Islam S; Wharton MK; Grube JW
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2022 Oct; 24(11):1834-1839. PubMed ID: 35605007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of California's 'Tobacco 21' law.
    Zhang X; Vuong TD; Andersen-Rodgers E; Roeseler A
    Tob Control; 2018 Nov; 27(6):656-662. PubMed ID: 29440328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adolescent smoking decline during California's tobacco control programme.
    Pierce JP; White MM; Gilpin EA
    Tob Control; 2005 Jun; 14(3):207-12. PubMed ID: 15923472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. California's tobacco 21 minimum sales age law and adolescents' tobacco and nicotine use: differential associations among racial and ethnic groups.
    Grube JW; Lipperman-Kreda S; García-Ramírez G; Paschall MJ; Abadi MH
    Tob Control; 2022 Dec; 31(e2):e126-e133. PubMed ID: 34193606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Building and Scaling-up California Quits: Supporting Health Systems Change for Tobacco Treatment.
    Kaslow AA; Romano PS; Schwarz E; Shaikh U; Tong EK
    Am J Prev Med; 2018 Dec; 55(6 Suppl 2):S214-S221. PubMed ID: 30454676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tobacco 21 policies in California and Hawaii and sales of cigarette packs: a difference-in-differences analysis.
    Ali FRM; Rice K; Fang X; Xu X
    Tob Control; 2020 Sep; 29(5):588-592. PubMed ID: 31645377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using a cessation-related outcome index to assess California's cessation progress at the population level.
    Tang H; Abramsohn E; Park HY; Cowling DW; Al-Delaimy WK
    Tob Control; 2010 Apr; 19 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i56-61. PubMed ID: 20382652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Do Local Tobacco-21 Laws Reduce Smoking Among 18 to 20 Year-Olds?
    Friedman AS; Wu RJ
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2020 Jun; 22(7):1195-1201. PubMed ID: 31348515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of Risk Perception of Smoking after the Implementation of California's Tobacco 21 Law.
    Sax JK; Doran N
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Dec; 19(24):. PubMed ID: 36554853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tobacco use disparities by racial/ethnic groups: California compared to the United States.
    Sakuma KK; Felicitas-Perkins JQ; Blanco L; Fagan P; Pérez-Stable EJ; Pulvers K; Romero D; Trinidad DR
    Prev Med; 2016 Oct; 91():224-232. PubMed ID: 27575315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. California as a model.
    Bal DG; Lloyd JC; Roeseler A; Shimizu R
    J Clin Oncol; 2001 Sep; 19(18 Suppl):69S-73S. PubMed ID: 11560977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-term evaluation of the rise in legal age-of-sale of cigarettes from 16 to 18 in England: a trend analysis.
    Beard E; Brown J; Jackson S; West R; Anderson W; Arnott D; Shahab L
    BMC Med; 2020 Apr; 18(1):85. PubMed ID: 32264873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tobacco-21 laws and young adult smoking: quasi-experimental evidence.
    Friedman AS; Buckell J; Sindelar JL
    Addiction; 2019 Oct; 114(10):1816-1823. PubMed ID: 31342591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Trends in Lung Cancer and Cigarette Smoking: California Compared to the Rest of the United States.
    Pierce JP; Shi Y; McMenamin SB; Benmarhnia T; Trinidad DR; Strong DR; White MM; Kealey S; Hendrickson EM; Stone MD; Villaseñor A; Kwong S; Zhang X; Messer K
    Cancer Prev Res (Phila); 2019 Jan; 12(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 30305281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of tobacco-free pharmacy policies on smoking prevalence.
    Jin Y; Lu B; Berman M; Klein EG; Foraker RE; Ferketich AK
    J Am Pharm Assoc (2003); 2016; 56(6):627-632. PubMed ID: 27667500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of California's tobacco and cannabis policies on the retail availability of little cigars/cigarillos and blunt wraps.
    Timberlake DS; Rhee J; Silver LD; Padon AA; Vos RO; Unger JB; Andersen-Rodgers E
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2021 Nov; 228():109064. PubMed ID: 34600261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of changes in tobacco control funding on healthcare expenditures in California, 2012-2016.
    Max W; Sung HY; Lightwood J
    Tob Control; 2013 May; 22(e1):e10-5. PubMed ID: 22253003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The health and economic impact of the Tobacco 21 Law in El Paso County, Texas: A modeling study.
    Garney W; Panjwani S; King L; Enderle J; O'Neil D; Li Y
    Prev Med Rep; 2022 Aug; 28():101896. PubMed ID: 35855925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.