BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33862413)

  • 1. A multi-level spatio-temporal analysis on prostate cancer outcomes.
    Wah W; Papa N; Evans M; Ahern S; Earnest A
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2021 Jun; 72():101939. PubMed ID: 33862413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Positive surgical margins: rate, contributing factors and impact on further treatment: findings from the Prostate Cancer Registry.
    Evans SM; Millar JL; Frydenberg M; Murphy DG; Davis ID; Spelman T; Bolton DM; Giles GG; Dean J; Costello AJ; Frauman AG; Kearns PA; Day L; Daniels C; McNeill JJ
    BJU Int; 2014 Nov; 114(5):680-90. PubMed ID: 24128010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of timeliness and receipt of first treatment on geographic variation in non-small cell lung cancer mortality.
    Wah W; Stirling RG; Ahern S; Earnest A
    Int J Cancer; 2021 Apr; 148(8):1828-1838. PubMed ID: 33045098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of oncological and health-related quality of life outcomes between open and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for localised prostate cancer - findings from the population-based Victorian Prostate Cancer Registry.
    Ong WL; Evans SM; Spelman T; Kearns PA; Murphy DG; Millar JL
    BJU Int; 2016 Oct; 118(4):563-9. PubMed ID: 26573954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variation in Positive Surgical Margin Status After Radical Prostatectomy for pT2 Prostate Cancer.
    Tan WS; Krimphove MJ; Cole AP; Marchese M; Berg S; Lipsitz SR; Löppenberg B; Nabi J; Abdollah F; Choueiri TK; Kibel AS; Sooriakumaran P; Trinh QD
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2019 Oct; 17(5):e1060-e1068. PubMed ID: 31303561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rates of Positive Surgical Margins and Their Effect on Cancer-specific Mortality at Radical Prostatectomy for Patients With Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer.
    Preisser F; Mazzone E; Knipper S; Nazzani S; Bandini M; Shariat SF; Tian Z; Saad F; Montorsi F; Zorn KC; Graefen M; Tilki D; Karakiewicz PI
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2019 Feb; 17(1):e130-e139. PubMed ID: 30366880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Population-based determinants of radical prostatectomy surgical margin positivity.
    Williams SB; D'Amico AV; Weinberg AC; Gu X; Lipsitz SR; Hu JC
    BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1734-40. PubMed ID: 20942827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. UK radical prostatectomy outcomes and surgeon case volume: based on an analysis of the British Association of Urological Surgeons Complex Operations Database.
    Vesey SG; McCabe JE; Hounsome L; Fowler S
    BJU Int; 2012 Feb; 109(3):346-54. PubMed ID: 21771246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy in the United States: Institutional variations and predictive factors.
    Pooli A; Salmasi A; Johnson DC; Lenis AT; Faiena I; Lebacle C; Golla V; Drakaki A; Gollapudi K; Blumberg J; Pantuck AJ; Chamie K
    Urol Oncol; 2020 Jan; 38(1):1.e17-1.e23. PubMed ID: 31537483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Swindle P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Wheeler T; Maru N; Slawin K; Scardino PT
    J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):903-7. PubMed ID: 16093984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Learning curve of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: Comprehensive evaluation and cumulative summation analysis of oncological outcomes.
    Sivaraman A; Sanchez-Salas R; Prapotnich D; Yu K; Olivier F; Secin FP; Barret E; Galiano M; Rozet F; Cathelineau X
    Urol Oncol; 2017 Apr; 35(4):149.e1-149.e6. PubMed ID: 28117215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Linear extent of positive surgical margin impacts biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a high-volume center.
    Porcaro AB; Tafuri A; Sebben M; Amigoni N; Shakir A; Corsi P; Processali T; Pirozzi M; Rizzetto R; Bernasconi R; Cerrato C; Tiso L; Migliorini F; Novella G; Brunelli M; De Marco V; Siracusano S; Artibani W
    J Robot Surg; 2020 Aug; 14(4):663-675. PubMed ID: 31893344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk factors associated with positive surgical margins following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: can nerve-sparing surgery increase the risk?
    Røder MA; Thomsen FB; Christensen IJ; Toft BG; Brasso K; Vainer B; Iversen P
    Scand J Urol; 2014 Feb; 48(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 23181451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
    Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
    BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Primary Gleason grade 4 at the positive margin is associated with metastasis and death among patients with Gleason 7 prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.
    Viers BR; Sukov WR; Gettman MT; Rangel LJ; Bergstralh EJ; Frank I; Tollefson MK; Thompson RH; Boorjian SA; Karnes RJ
    Eur Urol; 2014 Dec; 66(6):1116-24. PubMed ID: 25052213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predictors of prostate cancer specific mortality after radical prostatectomy: 10 year oncologic outcomes from the Victorian Radical Prostatectomy Registry.
    Bolton DM; Papa N; Ta AD; Millar J; Davidson AJ; Pedersen J; Syme R; Patel MI; Giles GG
    BJU Int; 2015 Oct; 116 Suppl 3():66-72. PubMed ID: 26176738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predictors of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy at a single institution: preoperative and pathologic factors, and the impact of surgeon variability and technique on incidence and location.
    Lallas CD; Fashola Y; Den RB; Gelpi-Hammerschmidt F; Calvaresi AE; McCue P; Birbe R; Gomella LG; Trabulsi EJ
    Can J Urol; 2014 Oct; 21(5):7479-86. PubMed ID: 25347375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A decade of declining prostatectomy margin positivity within a prostate cancer clinical quality registry.
    Papa N; Perera M; Bensley JG; Evans M; Millar J; Frydenberg M; Murphy DG; Bolton D
    Urol Oncol; 2022 Dec; 40(12):537.e19-537.e24. PubMed ID: 36167774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of pathologist experience on positive surgical margins following radical prostatectomy.
    Tallman JE; Packiam VT; Wroblewski KE; Paner GP; Eggener SE
    Urol Oncol; 2017 Jul; 35(7):461.e1-461.e6. PubMed ID: 28302349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radical prostatectomy for clinically localised prostate cancer at Rigshospitalet 1995-2011 - an analysis of surgical and oncological outcome.
    Røder MA
    Dan Med J; 2013 Dec; 60(12):B4752. PubMed ID: 24355454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.