BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33862416)

  • 21. Psychosocial Factors of Health Professionals' Intention to Use a Decision Aid for Down Syndrome Screening: Cross-Sectional Quantitative Study.
    Abbasgholizadeh Rahimi S; Lépine J; Croteau J; Robitaille H; Giguere AM; Wilson BJ; Rousseau F; Lévesque I; Légaré F
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 Apr; 20(4):e114. PubMed ID: 29695369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Ethical problems in intensive care unit admission and discharge decisions: a qualitative study among physicians and nurses in the Netherlands.
    Oerlemans AJ; van Sluisveld N; van Leeuwen ES; Wollersheim H; Dekkers WJ; Zegers M
    BMC Med Ethics; 2015 Feb; 16():9. PubMed ID: 25880418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Ethical decision-making regarding infant viability: A discussion.
    Kelly J; Welch E
    Nurs Ethics; 2018 Nov; 25(7):897-905. PubMed ID: 28027674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Could shared decision making affect staying in hospital? A cross-sectional pilot study.
    Gualano MR; Bert F; Passi S; Stillo M; Brescia V; Scaioli G; Thomas R; Voglino G; Minniti D; Boraso F; Siliquini R
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2019 Mar; 19(1):174. PubMed ID: 30885180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. "Well, I think there is great variation...": a qualitative study of oncologists' experiences and views regarding medical criteria and other factors relevant to treatment decisions in advanced cancer.
    Schildmann J; Tan J; Salloch S; Vollmann J
    Oncologist; 2013; 18(1):90-6. PubMed ID: 23287883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The influence of teams, supervisors and organizations on healthcare practitioners' abilities to practise ethically.
    Wall S; Austin W
    Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont); 2008; 21(4):85-99. PubMed ID: 19029847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Heidelberg Milestones Communication Approach (MCA) for patients with prognosis <12 months: protocol for a mixed-methods study including a randomized controlled trial.
    Siegle A; Villalobos M; Bossert J; Krug K; Hagelskamp L; Krisam J; Handtke V; Deis N; Jünger J; Wensing M; Thomas M
    Trials; 2018 Aug; 19(1):438. PubMed ID: 30107809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Norwegian healthcare professionals' perceptions of patient knowledge and involvement as basis for decision making in hematology.
    Heldal F; Steinsbekk A
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 2009 Mar; 36(2):E93-8. PubMed ID: 19273398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Physicians' self-reported practice behaviour regarding fertility-related discussions in paediatric oncology in Sweden.
    Armuand GM; Nilsson J; Rodriguez-Wallberg KA; Malmros J; Arvidson J; Lampic C; Wettergren L
    Psychooncology; 2017 Oct; 26(10):1684-1690. PubMed ID: 28734133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Ethical decision-making levels of oncology nurses.
    Baysal E; Sari D; Erdem H
    Nurs Ethics; 2019; 26(7-8):2204-2212. PubMed ID: 30343627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Ethical issues perceived by health care professionals working in chronic hemodialysis centers].
    Vukusich A; Catoni MI; Salas SP; Valdivieso A; Browne F; Roessler E
    Rev Med Chil; 2016 Jan; 144(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 26998978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. How experience makes a difference: practitioners' views on the use of deferred consent in paediatric and neonatal emergency care trials.
    Woolfall K; Frith L; Gamble C; Young B
    BMC Med Ethics; 2013 Nov; 14():45. PubMed ID: 24195717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Prioritising patient care: The different views of clinicians and managers.
    Skirbekk H; Hem MH; Nortvedt P
    Nurs Ethics; 2018 Sep; 25(6):746-759. PubMed ID: 28134008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Priority setting and the ethics of resource allocation within VA healthcare facilities: results of a survey.
    Foglia MB; Pearlman RA; Bottrell MM; Altemose JA; Fox E
    Organ Ethic; 2008; 4(2):83-96. PubMed ID: 18839751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Improving the Quality of Ethical Decision Making in Oncology.
    Mattes MD
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2020 Oct; 68(10):2413-2414. PubMed ID: 32570282
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. How doctors and patients discuss routine clinical decisions. Informed decision making in the outpatient setting.
    Braddock CH; Fihn SD; Levinson W; Jonsen AR; Pearlman RA
    J Gen Intern Med; 1997 Jun; 12(6):339-45. PubMed ID: 9192250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. 'Just so you know, the patient is staff': healthcare professionals' perceptions of caring for healthcare professional-patients.
    Svantesson M; Carlsson E; Prenkert M; Anderzén-Carlsson A
    BMJ Open; 2016 Jan; 6(1):e008507. PubMed ID: 26787244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Children's active participation in decision-making processes during hospitalisation: An observational study.
    Quaye AA; Coyne I; Söderbäck M; Hallström IK
    J Clin Nurs; 2019 Dec; 28(23-24):4525-4537. PubMed ID: 31430412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Decision-making on therapeutic futility in Mexican adolescents with cancer: a qualitative study.
    Cicero-Oneto CE; Valdez-Martinez E; Bedolla M
    BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Dec; 18(1):74. PubMed ID: 29228962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Role of the Nutrition Support Clinician on a Hospital Bioethics Committee.
    Schwartz DB; Pavic-Zabinski K; Tull K
    Nutr Clin Pract; 2019 Dec; 34(6):869-880. PubMed ID: 31464002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.