111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33862601)
1. Dosimetric analysis of cervical cancer stage IIB patients treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy using plan uncertainty parameters module of Varian Eclipse treatment planning system.
Singh G; Tyagi A; Thaper D; Kamal R; Kumar V; Oinam AS; Srivastava R; Halder S; Hukku S
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2021 Apr; 7(3):. PubMed ID: 33862601
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy vs. c-IMRT in esophageal cancer: a treatment planning comparison.
Yin L; Wu H; Gong J; Geng JH; Jiang F; Shi AH; Yu R; Li YH; Han SK; Xu B; Zhu GY
World J Gastroenterol; 2012 Oct; 18(37):5266-75. PubMed ID: 23066322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dosimetric and radiobiological comparison of prostate VMAT plans optimized using the photon and progressive resolution algorithm.
Chow JCL; Jiang R; Xu L
Med Dosim; 2020 Spring; 45(1):14-18. PubMed ID: 31103251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A dosimetric comparison of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) and High Dose Rate (HDR) brachytherapy in localized cervical cancer radiotherapy.
Wali L; Helal A; Darwesh R; Attar M
J Xray Sci Technol; 2019; 27(3):473-483. PubMed ID: 30958322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dosimetric benefits of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy in the treatment of postoperative cervical cancer patients.
Deng X; Han C; Chen S; Xie C; Yi J; Zhou Y; Zheng X; Deng Z; Jin X
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 28291936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of plan robustness on the dosimetry of volumetric arc radiotherapy (VMAT) with set-up uncertainty in Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) radiotherapy.
Ding Z; Xiang X; Zeng Q; Ma J; Dai Z; Kang K; Bi S
Radiat Oncol; 2022 Jan; 17(1):1. PubMed ID: 34980178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative analysis of simultaneous integrated boost and sequential boost radiotherapy in node-positive cervical cancer: dosimetric and radiobiological considerations.
Mishra R; Singh S; Patel G; Mandal A; Mishra H; Pandey A; Bahadur B; Singh PK; Sachan S; Tewari M
Radiat Environ Biophys; 2024 May; 63(2):297-306. PubMed ID: 38722389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetric study of uniform scanning proton therapy planning for prostate cancer patients with a metal hip prosthesis, and comparison with volumetric-modulated arc therapy.
Rana S; Cheng C; Zheng Y; Hsi W; Zeidan O; Schreuder N; Vargas C; Larson G
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 May; 15(3):4611. PubMed ID: 24892333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An integrated strategy of biological and physical constraints in biological optimization for cervical carcinoma.
Feng Z; Tao C; Zhu J; Chen J; Yu G; Qin S; Yin Y; Li D
Radiat Oncol; 2017 Apr; 12(1):64. PubMed ID: 28376900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dose-volume and radiobiological dependence on the calculation grid size in prostate VMAT planning.
Chow JCL; Jiang R
Med Dosim; 2018 Winter; 43(4):383-389. PubMed ID: 29373184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robust optimization in lung treatment plans accounting for geometric uncertainty.
Zhang X; Rong Y; Morrill S; Fang J; Narayanasamy G; Galhardo E; Maraboyina S; Croft C; Xia F; Penagaricano J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 May; 19(3):19-26. PubMed ID: 29524301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy for the treatment of a large planning target volume in thoracic esophageal cancer.
Abbas AS; Moseley D; Kassam Z; Kim SM; Cho C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 May; 14(3):4269. PubMed ID: 23652258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of setup and range uncertainties on TCP and NTCP following VMAT or IMPT of oropharyngeal cancer patients.
Hamming-Vrieze O; Depauw N; Craft DL; Chan AW; Rasch CRN; Verheij M; Sonke JJ; Kooy HM
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Apr; 64(9):095001. PubMed ID: 30921775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dosimetric study of a hybrid plan technique for external beam radiotherapy in patients with cervical cancer.
Martín-Tovar EA; Badillo-Alvarado AH; Cocom-Poot LE
Radiat Environ Biophys; 2021 Nov; 60(4):653-662. PubMed ID: 34363120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modeling the target dose fall-off in IMRT and VMAT planning techniques for cervical SBRT.
Brito Delgado A; Cohen D; Eng TY; Stanley DN; Shi Z; Charlton M; Gutiérrez AN
Med Dosim; 2018 Spring; 43(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 29223302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dosimetric comparison of MR-linac-based IMRT and conventional VMAT treatment plans for prostate cancer.
Da Silva Mendes V; Nierer L; Li M; Corradini S; Reiner M; Kamp F; Niyazi M; Kurz C; Landry G; Belka C
Radiat Oncol; 2021 Jul; 16(1):133. PubMed ID: 34289868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy planning using multicriteria optimization for localized prostate cancer.
Ghandour S; Matzinger O; Pachoud M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 May; 16(3):5410. PubMed ID: 26103500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Left breast irradiation with tangential intensity modulated radiotherapy (t-IMRT) versus tangential volumetric modulated arc therapy (t-VMAT): trade-offs between secondary cancer induction risk and optimal target coverage.
Karpf D; Sakka M; Metzger M; Grabenbauer GG
Radiat Oncol; 2019 Sep; 14(1):156. PubMed ID: 31477165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A treatment planning study comparing Elekta VMAT and fixed field IMRT using the varian treatment planning system eclipse.
Peters S; Schiefer H; Plasswilm L
Radiat Oncol; 2014 Jul; 9():153. PubMed ID: 25011529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dosimetric and radiobiological characterizations of prostate intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy: A single-institution review of ninety cases.
Khan MI; Jiang R; Kiciak A; Ur Rehman J; Afzal M; Chow JC
J Med Phys; 2016; 41(3):162-8. PubMed ID: 27651562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
