288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33864182)
41. Prostate cancer: Comparison of 3D T2-weighted with conventional 2D T2-weighted imaging for image quality and tumor detection.
Rosenkrantz AB; Neil J; Kong X; Melamed J; Babb JS; Taneja SS; Taouli B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Feb; 194(2):446-52. PubMed ID: 20093608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Three-dimensional T1-weighted gradient echo is a suitable alternative to two-dimensional T1-weighted spin echo for imaging the canine brain.
Fleming KL; Maddox TW; Warren-Smith CMR
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2019 Sep; 60(5):543-551. PubMed ID: 31146303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Knee derangements: comparison of isotropic 3D fast spin-echo, isotropic 3D balanced fast field-echo, and conventional 2D fast spin-echo MR imaging.
Jung JY; Yoon YC; Kim HR; Choe BK; Wang JH; Jung JY
Radiology; 2013 Sep; 268(3):802-13. PubMed ID: 23533289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Qualitative and quantitative assessment of isotropic ankle magnetic resonance imaging: three-dimensional isotropic intermediate-weighted turbo spin echo versus three-dimensional isotropic fast field echo sequences.
Kim HS; Yoon YC; Kwon JW; Choe BK
Korean J Radiol; 2012; 13(4):443-9. PubMed ID: 22778566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score assessed with an isotropic three-dimensional true fast imaging with steady-state precession sequence at 3.0 Tesla.
Welsch GH; Zak L; Mamisch TC; Resinger C; Marlovits S; Trattnig S
Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):603-12. PubMed ID: 19692843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Evaluation of diagnostic value and T2-weighted three-dimensional isotropic turbo spin-echo (3D-SPACE) image quality in comparison with T2-weighted two-dimensional turbo spin-echo (2D-TSE) sequences in lumbar spine MR imaging.
Hossein J; Fariborz F; Mehrnaz R; Babak R
Eur J Radiol Open; 2019; 6():36-41. PubMed ID: 30619918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Evaluation of pituitary structures and lesions with turbo spin-echo diffusion-weighted imaging.
Khant ZA; Azuma M; Kadota Y; Hattori Y; Takeshima H; Yokogami K; Watanabe T; Enzaki M; Nakaura T; Hirai T
J Neurol Sci; 2019 Oct; 405():116390. PubMed ID: 31476623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Characterization of carotid atherosclerosis with black-blood carotid plaque imaging using variable flip-angle 3D turbo spin-echo: comparison with 2D turbo spin-echo sequences.
Takano K; Yamashita S; Takemoto K; Inoue T; Sakata N; Kuwabara Y; Yoshimitsu K
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Mar; 81(3):e304-9. PubMed ID: 22115798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Uterine tumors: comparison of 3D versus 2D T2-weighted turbo spin-echo MR imaging at 3.0 T--initial experience.
Hori M; Kim T; Onishi H; Ueguchi T; Tatsumi M; Nakamoto A; Tsuboyama T; Tomoda K; Tomiyama N
Radiology; 2011 Jan; 258(1):154-63. PubMed ID: 21045182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. The usefulness of the three-dimensional enhanced T1 high-resolution isotropic volume excitation MR in the evaluation of shoulder pathology: comparison with two-dimensional enhanced T1 fat saturation MR.
Park HJ; Lee SY; Rho MH; Kwon HJ; Kim MS; Chung EC
Br J Radiol; 2015 Oct; 88(1054):20140830. PubMed ID: 26242410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Detection of brain metastases by 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T: comparison between T1-weighted volume isotropic turbo spin echo acquisition and 3-dimensional T1-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging.
Yoshida A; Tha KK; Fujima N; Zaitsu Y; Yoshida D; Tsukahara A; Onodera S; Shirato H; Terae S
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(1):84-90. PubMed ID: 23321838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Evaluation of aqueductal patency in patients with hydrocephalus: three-dimensional high-sampling-efficiency technique (SPACE) versus two-dimensional turbo spin echo at 3 Tesla.
Ucar M; Guryildirim M; Tokgoz N; Kilic K; Borcek A; Oner Y; Akkan K; Tali T
Korean J Radiol; 2014; 15(6):827-35. PubMed ID: 25469096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Evaluation of the orbit using contrast-enhanced radial 3D fat-suppressed T1 weighted gradient echo (Radial-VIBE) sequence.
Bangiyev L; Raz E; Block TK; Hagiwara M; Wu X; Yu E; Fatterpekar GM
Br J Radiol; 2015 Oct; 88(1054):20140863. PubMed ID: 26194589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Free-Breathing Radial 3D Fat-Suppressed T1-Weighted Gradient-Echo Sequence for Contrast-Enhanced Pediatric Spinal Imaging: Comparison With T1-Weighted Turbo Spin-Echo Sequence.
Cho HH; Choi YH; Cheon JE; Lee SM; Kim WS; Kim IO; Paek M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jul; 207(1):177-82. PubMed ID: 27070492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Contrast-Enhanced High-Resolution Intracranial Vessel Wall MRI with Compressed Sensing: Comparison with Conventional T1 Volumetric Isotropic Turbo Spin Echo Acquisition Sequence.
Park CJ; Cha J; Ahn SS; Choi HS; Kim YD; Nam HS; Heo JH; Lee SK
Korean J Radiol; 2020 Dec; 21(12):1334-1344. PubMed ID: 32767865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Differentiation between grade 3 and grade 4 articular cartilage defects of the knee: fat-suppressed proton density-weighted versus fat-suppressed three-dimensional gradient-echo MRI.
Lee SY; Jee WH; Kim SK; Koh IJ; Kim JM
Acta Radiol; 2010 May; 51(4):455-61. PubMed ID: 20350249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Six-Fold Acceleration of High-Spatial Resolution 3D SPACE MRI of the Knee Through Incoherent k-Space Undersampling and Iterative Reconstruction-First Experience.
Fritz J; Raithel E; Thawait GK; Gilson W; Papp DF
Invest Radiol; 2016 Jun; 51(6):400-9. PubMed ID: 26685106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Evaluation of deep learning reconstructed high-resolution 3D lumbar spine MRI.
Sun S; Tan ET; Mintz DN; Sahr M; Endo Y; Nguyen J; Lebel RM; Carrino JA; Sneag DB
Eur Radiol; 2022 Sep; 32(9):6167-6177. PubMed ID: 35322280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Three-Dimensional Isotropic MRI of the Cervical Spine: A Diagnostic Comparison With Conventional MRI.
Fu MC; Buerba RA; Neway WE; Brown JE; Trivedi M; Lischuk AW; Haims AH; Grauer JN
Clin Spine Surg; 2016 Mar; 29(2):66-71. PubMed ID: 26889989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Comparison of different magnetic resonance cholangiography techniques in living liver donors including Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced T1-weighted sequences.
Kinner S; Steinweg V; Maderwald S; Radtke A; Sotiropoulos G; Forsting M; Schroeder T
PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e113882. PubMed ID: 25426932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
