BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33864193)

  • 1. Mass spectrometric analysis of digesta does not improve the allergenicity assessment of GM crops.
    Herman RA; Bauman PA; Goodwin L; Islamovic E; Ma EH; Serrano H; Silvanovich A; Simmons AR; Song P; Tetteh AO; Wang R
    Transgenic Res; 2021 Jun; 30(3):283-288. PubMed ID: 33864193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of the potential allergenicity of genetically-engineered food crops.
    Ladics GS
    J Immunotoxicol; 2019 Dec; 16(1):43-53. PubMed ID: 30409058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The allergenicity of genetically modified foods from genetically engineered crops: A narrative and systematic review.
    Dunn SE; Vicini JL; Glenn KC; Fleischer DM; Greenhawt MJ
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2017 Sep; 119(3):214-222.e3. PubMed ID: 28890018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Challenges in testing genetically modified crops for potential increases in endogenous allergen expression for safety.
    Panda R; Ariyarathna H; Amnuaycheewa P; Tetteh A; Pramod SN; Taylor SL; Ballmer-Weber BK; Goodman RE
    Allergy; 2013 Feb; 68(2):142-51. PubMed ID: 23205714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Safety evaluation of genetically modified mustard (V4) seeds in terms of allergenicity: comparison with native crop.
    Misra A; Kumar S; Verma AK; Chanana NP; Das M; Dhawan V; Dwivedi PD
    GM Crops Food; 2012; 3(4):273-82. PubMed ID: 22743705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rapid simulated gastric fluid digestion of in-seed/grain proteins expressed in genetically engineered crops.
    Schafer BW; Embrey SK; Herman RA
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Nov; 81():106-112. PubMed ID: 27497625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Assessment of allergenicity of genetically modified food crops].
    Schauzu M; Pöting A; Rubin D; Lampen A
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2012 Mar; 55(3):402-7. PubMed ID: 22373855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Presence of small resistant peptides from new in vitro digestion assays detected by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry: An implication of allergenicity prediction of novel proteins?
    Wang R; Wang Y; Edrington TC; Liu Z; Lee TC; Silvanovich A; Moon HS; Liu ZL; Li B
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0233745. PubMed ID: 32542029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of possible allergenicity of hypothetical ORFs in common food crops using current bioinformatic guidelines and its implications for the safety assessment of GM crops.
    Young GJ; Zhang S; Mirsky HP; Cressman RF; Cong B; Ladics GS; Zhong CX
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2012 Oct; 50(10):3741-51. PubMed ID: 22867756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Allergenicity assessment strategy for novel food proteins and protein sources.
    Verhoeckx K; Broekman H; Knulst A; Houben G
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Aug; 79():118-124. PubMed ID: 27012375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Will genetically modified foods be allergenic?
    Taylor SL; Hefle SL
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2001 May; 107(5):765-71. PubMed ID: 11344340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transgenesis affects endogenous soybean allergen levels less than traditional breeding.
    Hill RC; Fast BJ; Herman RA
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Oct; 89():70-73. PubMed ID: 28720347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computational allergenicity prediction of transgenic proteins expressed in genetically modified crops.
    Verma AK; Misra A; Subash S; Das M; Dwivedi PD
    Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol; 2011 Sep; 33(3):410-22. PubMed ID: 20964517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Current codex guidelines for assessment of potential protein allergenicity.
    Ladics GS
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Oct; 46 Suppl 10():S20-3. PubMed ID: 18708115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Identifying food proteins with allergenic potential: evolution of approaches to safety assessment and research to provide additional tools.
    Ladics GS; Selgrade MK
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Aug; 54(3 Suppl):S2-6. PubMed ID: 19028539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Allergenicity assessment of genetically modified crops--what makes sense?
    Goodman RE; Vieths S; Sampson HA; Hill D; Ebisawa M; Taylor SL; van Ree R
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Jan; 26(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 18183024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Simulated gastric fluid assay for estimating the digestibility of newly expressed proteins in GE crops: Missteps in development and interpretation.
    Herman RA; Zhang JXQ
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2022 Nov; 169():113436. PubMed ID: 36165819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing genetically modified crops to minimize the risk of increased food allergy: a review.
    Goodman RE; Hefle SL; Taylor SL; van Ree R
    Int Arch Allergy Immunol; 2005 Jun; 137(2):153-66. PubMed ID: 15947471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of endogenous allergens for the safety evaluation of genetically engineered food crops: review of potential risks, test methods, examples and relevance.
    Goodman RE; Panda R; Ariyarathna H
    J Agric Food Chem; 2013 Sep; 61(35):8317-32. PubMed ID: 23848840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.