119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33864647)
1. A randomized controlled trial of three-dimensional versus two-dimensional imaging system on duration of surgery and mental workload for laparoscopic gastropexies in dogs.
Balsa IM; Giuffrida MA; Mayhew PD
Vet Surg; 2021 Jul; 50(5):944-953. PubMed ID: 33864647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of two novel self-anchoring barbed sutures in a prophylactic laparoscopic gastropexy compared with intracorporeal tied knots.
Spah CE; Elkins AD; Wehrenberg A; Jaffe MH; Baird DK; Naughton JF; Payton ME
Vet Surg; 2013 Nov; 42(8):932-42. PubMed ID: 24111750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of laparoscopic gastropexy performed via intracorporeal suturing with knotless unidirectional barbed suture using a needle driver versus a roticulated endoscopic suturing device: 30 cases.
Coleman KA; Monnet E
Vet Surg; 2017 Oct; 46(7):1002-1007. PubMed ID: 28921666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laparoscopic Gastropexy Using Knotless Unidirectional Suture and an Articulated Endoscopic Suturing Device: Seven Cases.
Coleman KA; Adams S; Smeak DD; Monnet E
Vet Surg; 2016 Nov; 45(S1):O95-O101. PubMed ID: 27731517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Total laparoscopic gastropexy using 1 simple continuous barbed suture line in 63 dogs.
Takacs JD; Singh A; Case JB; Mayhew PD; Giuffrida MA; Caceres AV; Fox-Alvarez WA; Runge JJ
Vet Surg; 2017 Feb; 46(2):233-241. PubMed ID: 27990648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Elective gastropexy with a reusable single-incision laparoscopic surgery port in dogs: 14 cases (2012-2013).
Stiles M; Case JB; Coisman J
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2016 Aug; 249(3):299-303. PubMed ID: 27439347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Simplified Minimally Invasive Surgical Approach for Prophylactic Laparoscopic Gastropexy in 21 Cases.
Deroy C; Hahn H; Bismuth C; Ragetly G; Gomes E; Poncet C
J Am Anim Hosp Assoc; 2019; 55(3):152-159. PubMed ID: 30870607
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Single Port Access Versus Multiple Port Access Systems in Elective Laparoscopy: 98 Dogs (2005-2014).
Gonzalez-Gasch E; Monnet E
Vet Surg; 2015 Oct; 44(7):895-9. PubMed ID: 26361366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of total laparoscopic gastropexy with the Ethicon Securestrap fixation device versus knotless barbed suture in dogs.
Lacitignola L; Crovace AM; Fracassi L; Di Bella C; Madaro L; Staffieri F
Vet Rec; 2021 Apr; 188(7):e113. PubMed ID: 33835588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laparoscopic single-port ovariectomy and gastropexy in dogs.
Gandini M; Giusto G
Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd; 2016 Nov; 158(11):755-758. PubMed ID: 27821379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Paramedian incisional complications after prophylactic laparoscopy-assisted gastropexy in 411 dogs.
Baron JK; Casale SA; Monnet E; Mayhew PD; Runge JJ; Follette CM; Phipps K; Powell ME; Reczynska AI; Squire NT; Barton BA; Berg J
Vet Surg; 2020 Jun; 49 Suppl 1():O148-O155. PubMed ID: 31814138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 2D vs. 3D imaging in laparoscopic surgery-results of a prospective randomized trial.
Buia A; Stockhausen F; Filmann N; Hanisch E
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2017 Dec; 402(8):1241-1253. PubMed ID: 28986719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical Analysis of Laparoscopic Incisional Gastropexy With Intracorporeal Suturing Using Knotless Polyglyconate.
Imhoff DJ; Cohen A; Monnet E
Vet Surg; 2015 Jul; 44 Suppl 1():39-43. PubMed ID: 24617501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective evaluation of two intracorporeally sutured prophylactic laparoscopic gastropexy techniques compared with laparoscopic-assisted gastropexy in dogs.
Mayhew PD; Brown DC
Vet Surg; 2009 Aug; 38(6):738-46. PubMed ID: 19674417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Combined laparoscopic ovariectomy and laparoscopic-assisted gastropexy versus combined laparoscopic ovariectomy and total laparoscopic gastropexy: A comparison of surgical time, complications and postoperative pain in dogs.
Leonardi F; Properzi R; Rosa J; Boschi P; Paviolo S; Costa GL; Bendinelli C
Vet Med Sci; 2020 Aug; 6(3):321-329. PubMed ID: 32017474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is a robotic system really better than the three-dimensional laparoscopic system in terms of suturing performance?: comparison among operators with different levels of experience.
Park YS; Oo AM; Son SY; Shin DJ; Jung DH; Ahn SH; Park DJ; Kim HH
Surg Endosc; 2016 Apr; 30(4):1485-90. PubMed ID: 26139502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of crosstalk on three-dimensional laparoscopic performance and workload.
Sakata S; Grove PM; Watson MO; Stevenson ARL
Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4044-4050. PubMed ID: 28281125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cognitive load in 3d and 2d minimally invasive colorectal surgery.
Inama M; Spolverato G; Impellizzeri H; Bacchion M; Creciun M; Casaril A; Moretto G
Surg Endosc; 2020 Jul; 34(7):3262-3269. PubMed ID: 32239306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of 2D 4K vs. 3D HD laparoscopic imaging systems in bariatric surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled prospective trial.
Zwimpfer TA; Stiegeler N; Müller PC; Schötzau A; Fellmann-Fischer B; Heinzelmann-Schwarz V; Peterli R; Kraljević M
Trials; 2024 Feb; 25(1):140. PubMed ID: 38389113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of length of incision and number of suture lines on the biomechanical properties of incisional gastropexy.
Webb RJ; Monnet E
Vet Surg; 2019 Aug; 48(6):933-937. PubMed ID: 31187882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
