These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33865206)

  • 1. Pedestrian assessment: Is displaying automated driving mode in self-driving vehicles as relevant as emitting an engine sound in electric vehicles?
    Faas SM; Baumann M
    Appl Ergon; 2021 Jul; 94():103425. PubMed ID: 33865206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigating Implicit and Explicit Communication of Highly Automated Vehicles in Japan: How do Light-band eHMIs affect Pedestrians' Willingness to Cross, Trust and Perceived Safety?
    Lau M; Lee J; Kitazaki S; Daimon T; Oehl M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Nov; 207():107719. PubMed ID: 39096539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. One Solution Fits All? Evaluating Different Communication Strategies of a Light-based External Human-Machine Interface for Differently Sized Automated Vehicles from a Pedestrian's Perspective.
    Lau M; Jipp M; Oehl M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Jun; 171():106641. PubMed ID: 35390700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. External Human-Machine Interfaces on Automated Vehicles: Effects on Pedestrian Crossing Decisions.
    de Clercq K; Dietrich A; Núñez Velasco JP; de Winter J; Happee R
    Hum Factors; 2019 Dec; 61(8):1353-1370. PubMed ID: 30912985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the hazard of quiet vehicles to pedestrians and drivers.
    Wogalter MS; Lim RW; Nyeste PG
    Appl Ergon; 2014 Sep; 45(5):1306-12. PubMed ID: 24035347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Deciding when to cross in front of an autonomous vehicle: How child and adult pedestrians respond to eHMI timing and vehicle kinematics.
    Devi Subramanian L; O'Neal EE; Kim NY; Noonan M; Plumert JM; Kearney JK
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Jul; 202():107567. PubMed ID: 38669901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Driver perceptions of the safety implications of quiet electric vehicles.
    Cocron P; Krems JF
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Sep; 58():122-31. PubMed ID: 23727553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pedestrians' road-crossing behavior towards eHMI-equipped autonomous vehicles driving in segregated and mixed traffic conditions.
    Song Y; Jiang Q; Chen W; Zhuang X; Ma G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Aug; 188():107115. PubMed ID: 37209555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Learning to interpret novel eHMI: The effect of vehicle kinematics and eHMI familiarity on pedestrian' crossing behavior.
    Lee YM; Madigan R; Uzondu C; Garcia J; Romano R; Markkula G; Merat N
    J Safety Res; 2022 Feb; 80():270-280. PubMed ID: 35249607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving the experience in the pedestrian's interaction with an autonomous vehicle: An ergonomic comparison of external HMI.
    Métayer N; Coeugnet S
    Appl Ergon; 2021 Oct; 96():103478. PubMed ID: 34116413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of artificial vehicle sounds for pedestrians on driver stress.
    Cottrell ND; Barton BK
    Ergonomics; 2012; 55(12):1476-86. PubMed ID: 23039324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditory perception of motor vehicle travel paths.
    Ashmead DH; Grantham DW; Maloff ES; Hornsby B; Nakamura T; Davis TJ; Pampel F; Rushing EG
    Hum Factors; 2012 Jun; 54(3):437-53. PubMed ID: 22768645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. External Human-Machine Interfaces Can Be Misleading: An Examination of Trust Development and Misuse in a CAVE-Based Pedestrian Simulation Environment.
    Kaleefathullah AA; Merat N; Lee YM; Eisma YB; Madigan R; Garcia J; Winter J
    Hum Factors; 2022 Sep; 64(6):1070-1085. PubMed ID: 33242999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Communicating Intent of Automated Vehicles to Pedestrians.
    Habibovic A; Lundgren VM; Andersson J; Klingegård M; Lagström T; Sirkka A; Fagerlönn J; Edgren C; Fredriksson R; Krupenia S; Saluäär D; Larsson P
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1336. PubMed ID: 30131737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Overestimated time-to-collision for quiet vehicles: Evidence from a study using a novel audiovisual virtual-reality system for traffic scenarios.
    Oberfeld D; Wessels M; Büttner D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 175():106778. PubMed ID: 35878469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The 'invisible gorilla' during pedestrian-AV interaction: Effects of secondary tasks on pedestrians' reaction to eHMIs.
    Zhao X; Li X; Rakotonirainy A; Bourgeois-Bougrine S; Gruyer D; Delhomme P
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Nov; 192():107246. PubMed ID: 37597379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How Do Human-Driven Vehicles Avoid Pedestrians in Interactive Environments? A Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Sun S; Zhang Z; Zhang Z; Deng P; Tian K; Wei C
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Oct; 22(20):. PubMed ID: 36298210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automated Vehicles and Pedestrian Safety: Exploring the Promise and Limits of Pedestrian Detection.
    Combs TS; Sandt LS; Clamann MP; McDonald NC
    Am J Prev Med; 2019 Jan; 56(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 30337236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pedestrian's risk-based negotiation model for self-driving vehicles to get the right of way.
    Gupta S; Vasardani M; Lohani B; Winter S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Mar; 124():163-173. PubMed ID: 30660067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. New Risk Situations Related to Low Noise from Electric Vehicles: Perception of Workers as Pedestrians and Other Vehicle Drivers.
    Pardo-Ferreira MC; Torrecilla-García JA; Heras-Rosas CL; Rubio-Romero JC
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Sep; 17(18):. PubMed ID: 32938012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.