675 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33865400)
1. Validity and responsiveness of EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D in patients with health complaints attributed to their amalgam fillings: a prospective cohort study of patients undergoing amalgam removal.
Lamu AN; Björkman L; Hamre HJ; Alræk T; Musial F; Robberstad B
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2021 Apr; 19(1):125. PubMed ID: 33865400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A head-to-head comparison of EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D in Dutch patients with fractures visiting a Fracture Liaison Service.
Li N; Boonen A; van den Bergh JP; van Kuijk SMJ; Wyers CE; van Oostwaard M; Vranken L; Bours SPG; Hiligsmann M
J Med Econ; 2022; 25(1):829-839. PubMed ID: 35674412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Responsiveness and minimally important difference of SF-6D and EQ-5D utility scores for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
Harvie HS; Honeycutt AA; Neuwahl SJ; Barber MD; Richter HE; Visco AG; Sung VW; Shepherd JP; Rogers RG; Jakus-Waldman S; Mazloomdoost D;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 220(3):265.e1-265.e11. PubMed ID: 30471259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of EQ-5D-5L, VAS, and SF-6D in Thai Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis.
Thaweethamcharoen T; Noparatayaporn P; Sritippayawan S; Aiyasanon N
Value Health Reg Issues; 2019 May; 18():59-64. PubMed ID: 30502661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. EQ-5D-5L is More Responsive than EQ-5D-3L to Treatment Benefit of Cataract Surgery.
Gandhi M; Ang M; Teo K; Wong CW; Wei YC; Tan RL; Janssen MF; Luo N
Patient; 2019 Aug; 12(4):383-392. PubMed ID: 30607809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D Utility Measures in Symptomatic benign Thyroid Nodules: Acceptability and Psychometric Evaluation.
Wong CKH; Lang BHH; Yu HMS; Lam CLK
Patient; 2017 Aug; 10(4):447-454. PubMed ID: 28224296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differential Psychometric Properties of EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level and Short-Form 6-Dimension Utility Measures in Low Back Pain.
Cheung PWH; Wong CKH; Cheung JPY
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Jun; 44(11):E679-E686. PubMed ID: 30475342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A vision 'bolt-on' increases the responsiveness of EQ-5D: preliminary evidence from a study of cataract surgery.
Gandhi M; Ang M; Teo K; Wong CW; Wei YC; Tan RL; Janssen MF; Luo N
Eur J Health Econ; 2020 Jun; 21(4):501-511. PubMed ID: 31902023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of measurement properties between UK SF-6D and English EQ-5D-5L and Thai EQ-5D-5L value sets in general Thai population.
Kangwanrattanakul K
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2021 Aug; 21(4):765-774. PubMed ID: 32981380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the EQ-5D-5L, EQ-VAS stand-alone component and Oxford knee score in the Australian knee arthroplasty population utilising minimally important difference, concurrent validity, predictive validity and responsiveness.
Lin DY; Cheok TS; Kaambwa B; Samson AJ; Morrison C; Chan T; Kroon HM; Jaarsma RL
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2023 May; 21(1):41. PubMed ID: 37165364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative performance of the EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D index scores in adults with type 2 diabetes.
Sayah FA; Qiu W; Xie F; Johnson JA
Qual Life Res; 2017 Aug; 26(8):2057-2066. PubMed ID: 28364183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Head-to-Head Comparison of UK SF-6D and Thai and UK EQ-5D-5L Value Sets in Thai Patients with Chronic Diseases.
Sakthong P; Munpan W
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2017 Oct; 15(5):669-679. PubMed ID: 28290106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Comparison of the Validity and Responsiveness of the EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D for Measuring Health Spillovers: A Study of the Family Impact of Meningitis.
Bhadhuri A; Jowett S; Jolly K; Al-Janabi H
Med Decis Making; 2017 Nov; 37(8):882-893. PubMed ID: 28525725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D.
Walters SJ; Brazier JE
Qual Life Res; 2005 Aug; 14(6):1523-32. PubMed ID: 16110932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of utility measurement using EQ-5D and SF-6D preference-based generic instruments in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Salaffi F; Carotti M; Ciapetti A; Gasparini S; Grassi W
Clin Exp Rheumatol; 2011; 29(4):661-71. PubMed ID: 21813061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the measurement properties of SF-6Dv2 and EQ-5D-5L in a Chinese population health survey.
Xie S; Wang D; Wu J; Liu C; Jiang W
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2022 Jun; 20(1):96. PubMed ID: 35710429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Psychometric properties of the five-level EuroQoL-5 dimension and Short Form-6 dimension measures of health-related quality of life in a population of pregnant women with depression.
Heslin M; Chua KC; Trevillion K; Nath S; Howard LM; Byford S
BJPsych Open; 2019 Oct; 5(6):e88. PubMed ID: 31588885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Which approach is better in eliciting health state utilities from breast cancer patients? Evidence from mainland China.
Li S; Wang M; Liu L; Chen G
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2019 Mar; 28(2):e12965. PubMed ID: 30499193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validity and responsiveness of EuroQol-5 dimension (EQ-5D) versus Short Form-6 dimension (SF-6D) questionnaire in chronic pain.
Obradovic M; Lal A; Liedgens H
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2013 Jul; 11():110. PubMed ID: 23815777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of the validity of two indirect utility instruments as measures of postoperative recovery.
Lee L; Mata J; Augustin BR; Carli F; Morin N; Latimer E; Feldman LS
J Surg Res; 2014 Jul; 190(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 24629417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
