These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3386583)

  • 1. Measurement of the spatial Wiener spectrum of nonstorage imaging devices.
    Drangova M; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 1988; 15(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 3386583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Wiener noise power spectra of radiological television systems using a digital oscilloscope.
    Rowlands JA; DeCrescenzo G
    Med Phys; 1990; 17(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 2308547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A spatio-temporal detective quantum efficiency and its application to fluoroscopic systems.
    Friedman SN; Cunningham IA
    Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):6061-9. PubMed ID: 21158318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optical image processing with liquid-crystal display for image intensifier/television systems.
    Lam KL; Chan HP; Doi K
    Med Phys; 1988; 15(6):838-45. PubMed ID: 3237140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Technical Note: Impact on detective quantum efficiency of edge angle determination method by International Electrotechnical Commission methodology for cardiac x-ray image detectors.
    Gislason-Lee AJ; Tunstall CM; Kengyelics SK; Cowen AR; Davies AG
    Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4423-7. PubMed ID: 26233172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 7. Noise Wiener spectra of II-TV digital imaging systems.
    Giger ML; Doi K; Fujita H
    Med Phys; 1986; 13(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 3517612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detective quantum efficiency of x-ray image intensifiers: comparison of scintillation spectrum and rms methods.
    Rowlands JA; Taylor KW
    Med Phys; 1984; 11(5):597-601. PubMed ID: 6503873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of the spatial-frequency-dependent DQE of optically coupled digital mammography detectors.
    Maidment AD; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 1994 Jun; 21(6):721-9. PubMed ID: 7935207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Physical imaging performance of a compact computed radiography acquisition device.
    Kengyelics SM; Launders JH; Cowen AR
    Med Phys; 1998 Mar; 25(3):354-60. PubMed ID: 9547503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Signal, noise power spectrum, and detective quantum efficiency of indirect-detection flat-panel imagers for diagnostic radiology.
    Siewerdsen JH; Antonuk LE; el-Mohri Y; Yorkston J; Huang W; Cunningham IA
    Med Phys; 1998 May; 25(5):614-28. PubMed ID: 9608470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Segmented phosphors: MEMS-based high quantum efficiency detectors for megavoltage x-ray imaging.
    Sawant A; Antonuk LE; El-Mohri Y; Li Y; Su Z; Wang Y; Yamamoto J; Zhao Q; Du H; Daniel J; Street R
    Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):553-65. PubMed ID: 15789602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of the kinestatic charge detection system as a high detective quantum efficiency electronic portal imaging device.
    Samant SS; Gopal A
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3557-67. PubMed ID: 17022252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Experimental and theoretical x-ray imaging performance comparison of iodine and lanthanide contrast agents.
    Cardinal HN; Holdsworth DW; Drangova M; Hobbs BB; Fenster A
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(1):15-31. PubMed ID: 8455493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A modified x-ray image intensifier with continuously variable field of view: resolution considerations.
    Drangova M; Holdsworth DW; Picot PA; Schulenburg K; Fenster A
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(6):1653-60. PubMed ID: 8309437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Image quality evaluation of a desktop computed radiography system.
    Fetterly KA; Hangiandreou NJ
    Med Phys; 2000 Dec; 27(12):2669-79. PubMed ID: 11190949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Empirical and theoretical investigation of the noise performance of indirect detection, active matrix flat-panel imagers (AMFPIs) for diagnostic radiology.
    Siewerdsen JH; Antonuk LE; el-Mohri Y; Yorkston J; Huang W; Boudry JM; Cunningham IA
    Med Phys; 1997 Jan; 24(1):71-89. PubMed ID: 9029542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Noise power spectra of images from digital mammography detectors.
    Williams MB; Mangiafico PA; Simoni PU
    Med Phys; 1999 Jul; 26(7):1279-93. PubMed ID: 10435530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Signal and noise transfer in spatiotemporal quantum-based imaging systems.
    Akbarpour R; Friedman SN; Siewerdsen JH; Neary JD; Cunningham IA
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2007 Dec; 24(12):B151-64. PubMed ID: 18059907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Segmented crystalline scintillators: empirical and theoretical investigation of a high quantum efficiency EPID based on an initial engineering prototype CsI(TI) detector.
    Sawant A; Antonuk LE; El-Mohri Y; Zhao Q; Wang Y; Li Y; Du H; Perna L
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1053-66. PubMed ID: 16696482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A moving slanted-edge method to measure the temporal modulation transfer function of fluoroscopic systems.
    Friedman SN; Cunningham IA
    Med Phys; 2008 Jun; 35(6):2473-84. PubMed ID: 18649480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.