130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33866159)
1. Estimating gaseous pollutants from bus emissions: A hybrid model based on GRU and XGBoost.
Hu L; Wang C; Ye Z; Wang S
Sci Total Environ; 2021 Aug; 783():146870. PubMed ID: 33866159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimation of real-driving emissions for buses fueled with liquefied natural gas based on gradient boosted regression trees.
Pan Y; Chen S; Qiao F; Ukkusuri SV; Tang K
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Apr; 660():741-750. PubMed ID: 30743960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Estimation of bus emission models for different fuel types of buses under real conditions.
Wang C; Ye Z; Yu Y; Gong W
Sci Total Environ; 2018 Nov; 640-641():965-972. PubMed ID: 30021329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Unraveling nonlinear and interaction effects of various determinants on bus gaseous emissions.
Hu L; Bi H; Wang C; Ye Z; Cheng J; Wu H
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Mar; 812():151427. PubMed ID: 34742955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Emissions of toxic pollutants from compressed natural gas and low sulfur diesel-fueled heavy-duty transit buses tested over multiple driving cycles.
Kado NY; Okamoto RA; Kuzmicky PA; Kobayashi R; Ayala A; Gebel ME; Rieger PL; Maddox C; Zafonte L
Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Oct; 39(19):7638-49. PubMed ID: 16245838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On-road pollutant emission and fuel consumption characteristics of buses in Beijing.
Wang A; Ge Y; Tan J; Fu M; Shah AN; Ding Y; Zhao H; Liang B
J Environ Sci (China); 2011; 23(3):419-26. PubMed ID: 21520811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating real-world CO
Yang L; Zhang S; Wu Y; Chen Q; Niu T; Huang X; Zhang S; Zhang L; Zhou Y; Hao J
Environ Pollut; 2016 Nov; 218():453-462. PubMed ID: 27443949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Understanding and estimating the carbon dioxide emissions for urban buses at different road locations: A comparison between new-energy buses and conventional diesel buses.
Pan Y; Qiao F; Tang K; Chen S; Ukkusuri SV
Sci Total Environ; 2020 Feb; 703():135533. PubMed ID: 31767339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ultrafine PM emissions from natural gas, oxidation-catalyst diesel, and particle-trap diesel heavy-duty transit buses.
Holmén BA; Ayala A
Environ Sci Technol; 2002 Dec; 36(23):5041-50. PubMed ID: 12523418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Exposure to BTEX in buses: The influence of vehicle fuel type.
Fontes T; Manso MC; Prata JC; Carvalho M; Silva C; Barros N
Environ Pollut; 2019 Dec; 255(Pt 1):113100. PubMed ID: 31542674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Real-world operation conditions and on-road emissions of Beijing diesel buses measured by using portable emission measurement system and electric low-pressure impactor.
Liu Z; Ge Y; Johnson KC; Shah AN; Tan J; Wang C; Yu L
Sci Total Environ; 2011 Mar; 409(8):1476-80. PubMed ID: 21295821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of the congestion charging scheme on air quality in London. Part 1. Emissions modeling and analysis of air pollution measurements.
Kelly F; Anderson HR; Armstrong B; Atkinson R; Barratt B; Beevers S; Derwent D; Green D; Mudway I; Wilkinson P;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Apr; (155):5-71. PubMed ID: 21830496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Pollutant Emissions from Diesel Buses Fueled with Waste Cooking Oil Based Biodiesel].
Hu ZY; Lin BQ; Huang C; Wang HL; Jing SA; Lou DM
Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2018 Feb; 39(2):626-632. PubMed ID: 29964824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of emissions from vehicles fueled with diesel or compressed natural gas.
Hesterberg TW; Lapin CA; Bunn WB
Environ Sci Technol; 2008 Sep; 42(17):6437-45. PubMed ID: 18800512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Unregulated emissions from compressed natural gas (CNG) transit buses configured with and without oxidation catalyst.
Okamoto RA; Kado NY; Kuzmicky PA; Ayala A; Kobayashi R
Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Jan; 40(1):332-41. PubMed ID: 16433369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Exploring the influence of contributing factors and impact degree on bus emissions in real-world conditions.
Wang C; Ye Z; Bi H
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Jul; 28(27):36092-36101. PubMed ID: 33682059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing on-road emissions from urban buses in different traffic congestion scenarios by integrating real-world driving, traffic, and emissions data.
Rosero F; Fonseca N; Mera Z; López JM
Sci Total Environ; 2023 Mar; 863():161002. PubMed ID: 36535483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Health Benefits from Upgrading Public Buses for Cleaner Air: A Case Study of Clark County, Nevada and the United States.
Olawepo JO; Chen LA
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Feb; 16(5):. PubMed ID: 30823388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Emission inventory estimation of an intercity bus terminal.
Qiu Z; Li X; Hao Y; Deng S; Gao HO
Environ Monit Assess; 2016 Jun; 188(6):367. PubMed ID: 27220506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of on-road emissions for hybrid and regular transit buses.
Hallmark SL; Wang B; Sperry R
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2013 Oct; 63(10):1212-20. PubMed ID: 24282974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
