186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33866602)
1. Comprehensive peri-implant tissue evaluation with ultrasonography and cone-beam computed tomography: A pilot study.
Siqueira R; Sinjab K; Pan YC; Soki F; Chan HL; Kripfgans O
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Jul; 32(7):777-785. PubMed ID: 33866602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Zirconia implants interfere with the evaluation of peri-implant bone defects in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images even with artifact reduction, a pilot study.
Kuusisto N; Abushahba F; Syrjänen S; Huumonen S; Vallittu P; Närhi T
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2023 Nov; 52(8):20230252. PubMed ID: 37641961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ultrasonography for noninvasive and real-time evaluation of peri-implant tissue dimensions.
Chan HL; Sinjab K; Li J; Chen Z; Wang HL; Kripfgans OD
J Clin Periodontol; 2018 Aug; 45(8):986-995. PubMed ID: 29757464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Non-invasive evaluation of facial crestal bone with ultrasonography.
Chan HL; Sinjab K; Chung MP; Chiang YC; Wang HL; Giannobile WV; Kripfgans OD
PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0171237. PubMed ID: 28178323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy evaluation of cone beam computed tomography applied to measure peri-implant bone thickness in living patients: an ex vivo and in vivo experiment.
Lan Y; Huang X; Fan M; Yu H; Xie Z; Zhou Y
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Oct; 26(10):6347-6359. PubMed ID: 35802190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of peri-implant bone evaluation using cone beam CT, digital intra-oral radiographs and histology.
Ritter L; Elger MC; Rothamel D; Fienitz T; Zinser M; Schwarz F; Zöller JE
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(6):20130088. PubMed ID: 24786136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of peri-implant defects at titanium and zirconium dioxide implants by means of periapical radiographs and cone beam computed tomography: An in-vitro examination.
Steiger-Ronay V; Krcmaric Z; Schmidlin PR; Sahrmann P; Wiedemeier DB; Benic GI
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Dec; 29(12):1195-1201. PubMed ID: 30387207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of Pre- and Post-loading Peri-implant Crestal Bone Levels Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography: An
Trivedi A; Trivedi S; Narang H; Sarkar P; Sehdev B; Pendyala G; Gill P
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Jan; 23(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 35656662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ultrasonography for chairside evaluation of periodontal structures: A pilot study.
Tattan M; Sinjab K; Lee E; Arnett M; Oh TJ; Wang HL; Chan HL; Kripfgans OD
J Periodontol; 2020 Jul; 91(7):890-899. PubMed ID: 31837020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. CBCT analysis of crestal soft tissue thickness before implant placement and its relationship with cortical bone thickness.
Cui X; Reason T; Pardi V; Wu Q; Martinez Luna AA
BMC Oral Health; 2022 Dec; 22(1):593. PubMed ID: 36496410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography, dental magnetic resonance imaging, and intraoral radiography for detecting peri-implant bone defects at single zirconia implants-An in vitro study.
Hilgenfeld T; Juerchott A; Deisenhofer UK; Krisam J; Rammelsberg P; Heiland S; Bendszus M; Schwindling FS
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Sep; 29(9):922-930. PubMed ID: 30112833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of peri-implant bone defects by using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT): an integrative review.
Costa JA; Mendes JM; Salazar F; Pacheco JJ; Rompante P; Câmara MI
Oral Radiol; 2023 Jul; 39(3):455-466. PubMed ID: 37058184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Feasibility of a combination of intraoral UHFUS and CBCT in the study of peri-implantitis.
Izzetti R; Vitali S; Gabriele M; Caramella D
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2019 Mar; 127(3):e89-e94. PubMed ID: 30249536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy of low-dose cone beam computed tomography and metal artifact reduction tool for assessment of peri-implant bone defects: an in vitro study.
Nomier AS; Gaweesh YSE; Taalab MR; El Sadat SA
BMC Oral Health; 2022 Dec; 22(1):615. PubMed ID: 36528573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measurement of Crestal Cortical Bone Thickness at Implant Site: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study.
Gupta A; Rathee S; Agarwal J; Pachar RB
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Sep; 18(9):785-789. PubMed ID: 28874642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Effect of Implant-Induced Artifacts on Interpreting Adjacent Bone Structures on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scans.
Sheridan RA; Chiang YC; Decker AM; Sutthiboonyapan P; Chan HL; Wang HL
Implant Dent; 2018 Feb; 27(1):10-14. PubMed ID: 29095787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of High-Frequency Ultrasound Scanner in Detecting Peri-implant Bone Defects.
Bohner L; Habor D; Gremse F; Tortamano P; Wolfart S; Marotti J
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Mar; 45(3):650-659. PubMed ID: 30593434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Higher Resolution in Cone Beam Computed Tomography Is Accompanied by Improved Bone Detection in Peri-implant Bone Despite Metal Artifact Presence.
Kerkfeld V; Meyer U
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(6):1331-1338. PubMed ID: 30427964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cone beam computed tomography artefacts around dental implants with different materials influencing the detection of peri-implant bone defects.
Schriber M; Yeung AWK; Suter VGA; Buser D; Leung YY; Bornstein MM
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Jul; 31(7):595-606. PubMed ID: 32147872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of peri-implant bone thickness and validity of assessing bone augmentation material using cone beam computed tomography.
Wang D; Künzel A; Golubovic V; Mihatovic I; John G; Chen Z; Becker J; Schwarz F
Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jul; 17(6):1601-9. PubMed ID: 23064974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
