BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33866947)

  • 21. A retrospective review of the real-world experience of the Pegfilgrastim biosimilar (Lapelga®) to the reference biologic (Neulasta®).
    Wong G; Zhang L; Majeed H; Razvi Y; DeAngelis C; Lam E; McKenzie E; Wang K; Pasetka M
    J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2022 Jan; 28(1):5-16. PubMed ID: 33215563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparative effectiveness of pegfilgrastim biosimilars vs originator for prevention of febrile neutropenia: A retrospective cohort study.
    Wang CY; Vouri SM; Park H; Heldermon CD; Brown JD
    J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2023 Feb; 29(2):119-127. PubMed ID: 36705287
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus six days of filgrastim for preventing febrile neutropenia in breast cancer patients.
    Danova M; Chiroli S; Rosti G; Doan QV
    Tumori; 2009; 95(2):219-26. PubMed ID: 19579869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Efficacy and safety of two pegfilgrastim biosimilars: Tripegfilgrastim and pegteograstim.
    Kang KW; Lee BH; Jeon MJ; Yu ES; Kim DS; Lee SR; Sung HJ; Choi CW; Park Y; Kim BS
    Cancer Med; 2020 Sep; 9(17):6102-6110. PubMed ID: 32633471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus filgrastim for prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in patients with lymphoma: a systematic review.
    Gebremariam GT; Fentie AM; Beyene K; Sander B; Gebretekle GB
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2022 Dec; 22(1):1600. PubMed ID: 36585648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Incidence and risk factors for febrile neutropenia in Japanese patients with non-Hodgkin B cell lymphoma receiving R-CHOP: 2-year experience in a single center (STOP FN in NHL 2).
    Yokoyama M; Kusano Y; Nishihara A; Inoue N; Nishimura N; Mishima Y; Terui Y; Nukada T; Nomura T; Hatake K
    Support Care Cancer; 2020 Feb; 28(2):571-579. PubMed ID: 31093770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of effectiveness of biosimilar filgrastim (Nivestim™), reference Amgen filgrastim and pegfilgrastim in febrile neutropenia primary prevention in breast cancer patients treated with neo(adjuvant) TAC: a non-interventional cohort study.
    Brito M; Esteves S; André R; Isidoro M; Moreira A
    Support Care Cancer; 2016 Feb; 24(2):597-603. PubMed ID: 26111956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Pegfilgrastim Prophylaxis Is Effective in the Prevention of Febrile Neutropenia and Reduces Mortality in Patients Aged ≥ 75 Years with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Treated with R-CHOP: A Prospective Cohort Study.
    Jeong SH; Kim SJ; Yoon DH; Park Y; Kang HJ; Koh Y; Lee GW; Lee WS; Yang DH; Do YR; Kim MK; Yoo KH; Choi YS; Yun HJ; Yi JH; Jo JC; Eom HS; Kwak JY; Shin HJ; Park BB; Hyun SY; Yi SY; Kwon JH; Oh SY; Kim HJ; Sohn BS; Won JH; Kim SH; Lee HS; Suh C; Kim WS
    Cancer Res Treat; 2022 Oct; 54(4):1268-1277. PubMed ID: 34990525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Comparison of Pegfilgrastim and Filgrastim for the Primary Prophylactic Effect for Preventing Febrile Neutropenia in Patients Undergoing Rituximab with Dose-adjusted EPOCH Chemotherapy].
    Kataoka T; Sakurashita H; Taogoshi T; Nishigakiuchi R; Murase T; Izumitani S; Saeki Y; Matsuo H
    Yakugaku Zasshi; 2019; 139(4):629-633. PubMed ID: 30930398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Use of pegfilgrastim primary prophylaxis and risk of infection, by chemotherapy cycle and regimen, among patients with breast cancer or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
    Langeberg WJ; Siozon CC; Page JH; Morrow PK; Chia VM
    Support Care Cancer; 2014 Aug; 22(8):2167-75. PubMed ID: 24652049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparative cost-efficiency across the European G5 countries of various regimens of filgrastim, biosimilar filgrastim, and pegfilgrastim to reduce the incidence of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia.
    Aapro M; Cornes P; Abraham I
    J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2012 Jun; 18(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 21610020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cost-effectiveness of filgrastim and pegfilgrastim as primary prophylaxis against febrile neutropenia in lymphoma patients.
    Lathia N; Isogai PK; De Angelis C; Smith TJ; Cheung M; Mittmann N; Hoch JS; Walker S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Aug; 105(15):1078-85. PubMed ID: 23873405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Patient, nurse, and physician preferences: final results of the CONVENIENCE study evaluating pegfilgrastim prophylaxis via pre-filled syringe or on-body injector in cancer patients.
    Metz M; Semsek D; Rogmans G; Hutzschenreuter U; Fietz T; Harde J; Zacharias S; Hielscher C; Lorenz A; Zahn MO; Guth D; Liebers S; Berghorn M; Grebhardt S; Matillon CD; Egerer G; Potthoff K
    Support Care Cancer; 2021 Nov; 29(11):6633-6643. PubMed ID: 33956213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparative effectiveness of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors to prevent febrile neutropenia and related complications in cancer patients in clinical practice: A systematic review.
    Mitchell S; Li X; Woods M; Garcia J; Hebard-Massey K; Barron R; Samuel M
    J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2016 Oct; 22(5):702-16. PubMed ID: 26769697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Pegfilgrastim for the prevention of febrile neutropenia in patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma--a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Numnum TM; Kimball KJ; Rocconi RP; Kilgore LC; Straughn JM
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2007; 17(5):1019-24. PubMed ID: 17386043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Outcomes Associated With the Use of Pegfilgrastim On-body Injector in Patients Receiving Chemotherapy Requiring Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Support.
    Patel J; Rainess RA; Benfield MJ; Rogers KML; Moore DC; Larck C; Arnall JR
    Hosp Pharm; 2021 Apr; 56(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 33790481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of filgrastim versus pegfilgrastim on outcomes of DA-R-EPOCH for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
    Roder L; Konrardy K; Grauer D; Hoffmann M
    Support Care Cancer; 2021 Sep; 29(9):5075-5082. PubMed ID: 33594515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Pegfilgrastim-jmdb/MYL-1401H: A Pegfilgrastim Biosimilar.
    Hoy SM
    BioDrugs; 2019 Feb; 33(1):117-120. PubMed ID: 30701419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Primary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim during the first cycle of R-CHOP to avoid reduction of dose intensity in elderly patients.
    Ise M; Matsuda K; Shimura A; Masamoto Y; Kurokawa M
    Int J Hematol; 2021 Jun; 113(6):823-831. PubMed ID: 33738702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparative effectiveness of colony-stimulating factors for febrile neutropenia: a retrospective study.
    Tan H; Tomic K; Hurley D; Daniel G; Barron R; Malin J
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2011 Jan; 27(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 21091127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.