123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33867239)
1. Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal approaches of pyeloplasty in management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: A meta-analysis.
Song P; Shu M; Peng Z; Yang L; Zhou M; Wang Z; Lu N; Pei C; Dong Q
Asian J Surg; 2022 Jan; 45(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 33867239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative efficacy and safety of different minimal invasive pyeloplasty in treating patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a network meta-analysis.
Li P; Ma Y; Jin X; Xiang L; Li H; Wang K
World J Urol; 2023 Oct; 41(10):2659-2669. PubMed ID: 37566142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Advance in re-do pyeloplasty for the management of recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction after surgery].
Xiong SW; Wang J; Zhu WJ; Cheng SD; Zhang L; Li XS; Zhou LQ
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Aug; 52(4):794-798. PubMed ID: 32773819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Meta-analysis of retroperitoneal vs transperitoneal laparoscopic and robot-assisted pyeloplasty for the management of pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction.
Chua ME; Ming JM; Kim JK; Milford KL; Silangcruz JM; Ren L; Rickard M; Lorenzo AJ
BJU Int; 2021 Jun; 127(6):687-702. PubMed ID: 33030262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Meta-analysis of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal approaches of laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Wu Y; Dong Q; Han P; Liu L; Wang L; Wei Q
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2012 Sep; 22(7):658-62. PubMed ID: 22731801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Our experience with retroperitoneal and transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction.
Davenport K; Minervini A; Timoney AG; Keeley FX
Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):973-7. PubMed ID: 16171940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus open pyeloplasty for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children.
Abdel-Karim AM; Fahmy A; Moussa A; Rashad H; Elbadry M; Badawy H; Hammady A
J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Dec; 12(6):401.e1-401.e6. PubMed ID: 27614698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective randomized comparison between transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty and retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Singh V; Sinha RJ; Gupta DK; Kumar V; Pandey M; Akhtar A
JSLS; 2014; 18(3):. PubMed ID: 25392671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children: Randomized clinical trial.
Badawy H; Zoaier A; Ghoneim T; Hanno A
J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Jun; 11(3):122.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25979219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of open and laparoscopic pyeloplasty in ureteropelvic junction obstruction surgery: report of 49 cases.
Umari P; Lissiani A; Trombetta C; Belgrano E
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2011 Dec; 83(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 22670313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of DJ stented, external stented and stent-less procedures for pediatric pyeloplasty: A network meta-analysis.
Liu X; Huang C; Guo Y; Yue Y; Hong J
Int J Surg; 2019 Aug; 68():126-133. PubMed ID: 31279854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction via Retroperitoneal and Transperitoneal Approaches.
Ji F; Chen L; Wu C; Li J; Hang Y; Yan B
Front Pediatr; 2021; 9():707266. PubMed ID: 34395345
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Sundaram CP; Grubb RL; Rehman J; Yan Y; Chen C; Landman J; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2037-40. PubMed ID: 12771713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A prospective randomised comparison between the transperitoneal and retroperitoneoscopic approaches for robotic-assisted pyeloplasty in a single surgeon, single centre study.
Khoder WY; Waidelich R; Ghamdi AMA; Schulz T; Becker A; Stief CG
J Robot Surg; 2018 Mar; 12(1):131-137. PubMed ID: 28534190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Secondary and Primary Minimally Invasive Pyeloplasty in the Treatment of Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Du T; Qi P; He L; Yang S; Zhang B; Shang P
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2022 Aug; 32(8):871-883. PubMed ID: 35319279
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Feasibility analysis of laparoscopic transperitoneal and transmesenteric pyeloplasty in recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction].
Zhou LQ; Zhang ZY; Li XS; He ZS
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2011 Aug; 43(4):540-3. PubMed ID: 21844962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laparoscopic treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in five pediatric cases of pelvic kidneys.
Muller CO; Blanc T; Peycelon M; El Ghoneimi A
J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Dec; 11(6):353.e1-5. PubMed ID: 26233554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transperitoneal Versus Retroperitoneal Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Children. A Multicentre, Prospective Study.
Blanc T; Abbo O; Vatta F; Grosman J; Marquant F; Elie C; Juricic M; Laraqui S; Broch A; Arnaud A
Eur Urol Open Sci; 2022 Jul; 41():134-140. PubMed ID: 35813254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Missed anterior crossing vessels during open retroperitoneal pyeloplasty: laparoscopic transperitoneal discovery and repair.
Rehman J; Landman J; Sundaram C; Clayman RV
J Urol; 2001 Aug; 166(2):593-6. PubMed ID: 11458074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laparoscopic management of recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction following pyeloplasty: a single surgical team experience with 38 cases.
Chiancone F; Fedelini M; Pucci L; Meccariello C; Fedelini P
Int Braz J Urol; 2017; 43(3):512-517. PubMed ID: 28191792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
