150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33867247)
1. How does a prebiopsy mri approach for prostate cancer diagnosis affect prostatectomy upgrade rates?
Sussman J; Haj-Hamed M; Talarek J; Verma S; Sidana A
Urol Oncol; 2021 Nov; 39(11):784.e11-784.e16. PubMed ID: 33867247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. PI-RADS Version 2.0 Versus Version 2.1: Comparison of Prostate Cancer Gleason Grade Upgrade and Downgrade Rates From MRI-Targeted Biopsy to Radical Prostatectomy.
Yilmaz EC; Lin Y; Belue MJ; Harmon SA; Phelps TE; Merriman KM; Hazen LA; Garcia C; Johnson L; Lay NS; Toubaji A; Merino MJ; Patel KR; Parnes HL; Law YM; Wood BJ; Gurram S; Choyke PL; Pinto PA; Turkbey B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2024 Jan; 222(1):e2329964. PubMed ID: 37729551
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Cancer-specific outcomes for prostate cancer patients who had prebiopsy prostate MRI.
Li J; Patil D; Sanda MG; Filson CP
Urol Oncol; 2022 Feb; 40(2):58.e9-58.e15. PubMed ID: 34353711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cribriform morphology predicts upstaging after radical prostatectomy in patients with Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer at transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided needle biopsy.
Keefe DT; Schieda N; El Hallani S; Breau RH; Morash C; Robertson SJ; Mai KT; Belanger EC; Flood TA
Virchows Arch; 2015 Oct; 467(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 26229020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gleason Grade Group Concordance between Systematic Template Combining Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Targeted Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Specimens: A Comparison of Transperineal and Transrectal Approaches.
Wu S; Feldman AS; Kim MM; Lin SX; Cornejo KM; Harisinghani MG; Dahl DM; Wu CL
Urology; 2023 May; 175():151-156. PubMed ID: 36828261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Suitability of conventional systematic vs. MRI-guided targeted biopsy approaches to assess surgical treatment delay for radical prostatectomy.
Kachanov M; Budäus L; Witt JH; Wagner C; Zinke J; Fangmeyer B; Schütte A; Spieker T; Beyersdorff D; Graefen M; Rachubinski P; Leyh-Bannurah SR
World J Urol; 2022 Dec; 40(12):2955-2961. PubMed ID: 36357604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging on biopsy and radical prostatectomy grade concordance.
Shoag JE; Cai PY; Gross MD; Gaffney C; Li D; Mao J; Nowels M; Scherr DS; Sedrakyan A; Hu JC
Cancer; 2020 Jul; 126(13):2986-2990. PubMed ID: 32320063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relationship Between Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Biopsy Indication, and MRI-ultrasound Fusion-targeted Prostate Biopsy Outcomes.
Meng X; Rosenkrantz AB; Mendhiratta N; Fenstermaker M; Huang R; Wysock JS; Bjurlin MA; Marshall S; Deng FM; Zhou M; Melamed J; Huang WC; Lepor H; Taneja SS
Eur Urol; 2016 Mar; 69(3):512-7. PubMed ID: 26112001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cancer detection rate of prebiopsy MRI with subsequent systematic and targeted biopsy are superior to non-targeting systematic biopsy without MRI in biopsy naïve patients: a retrospective cohort study.
Washino S; Kobayashi S; Okochi T; Kameda T; Konoshi T; Miyagawa T; Takayama T; Morita T
BMC Urol; 2018 May; 18(1):51. PubMed ID: 29843694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate on cancer detection and treatment patterns.
Liu W; Patil D; Howard DH; Moore RH; Wang H; Sanda MG; Filson CP
Urol Oncol; 2019 Mar; 37(3):181.e15-181.e21. PubMed ID: 30514604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical impact of prostate biopsy undergrading in an academic and community setting.
Mortezavi A; Keller EX; Poyet C; Hermanns T; Saba K; Randazzo M; Fankhauser CD; Wild PJ; Moch H; Sulser T; Eberli D
World J Urol; 2016 Oct; 34(10):1481-90. PubMed ID: 26931560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in Biopsy-naive Men with Suspected Prostate Cancer Based on Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen Values: Results from a Randomized Prospective Blinded Controlled Trial.
Tonttila PP; Lantto J; Pääkkö E; Piippo U; Kauppila S; Lammentausta E; Ohtonen P; Vaarala MH
Eur Urol; 2016 Mar; 69(3):419-25. PubMed ID: 26033153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.
Boesen L
Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prostate cancer management choices in patients undergoing multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion biopsy compared to systematic biopsy.
Gordetsky JB; Saylor B; Bae S; Nix JW; Rais-Bahrami S
Urol Oncol; 2018 May; 36(5):241.e7-241.e13. PubMed ID: 29526599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Gleason Grade Group Concordance between Preoperative Targeted Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Histopathologic Analysis: A Comparison Between In-Bore MRI-guided and MRI-Transrectal US Fusion Prostate Biopsies.
Costa DN; Cai Q; Xi Y; Recchimuzzi DZ; Subramanian N; Bagrodia A; Rofsky NM; Roehrborn CG; Hornberger B; Shah RB; Goldberg K; Diaz de Leon A; Pedrosa I
Radiol Imaging Cancer; 2021 Mar; 3(2):e200123. PubMed ID: 33817652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pathological findings at radical prostatectomy of biopsy naïve men diagnosed with MRI targeted biopsy alone without concomitant standard systematic sampling.
Luzzago S; Petralia G; Maresca D; Sabatini I; Cordima G; Brescia A; Verweij F; Garelli G; Mistretta FA; Cioffi A; Pricolo P; Alessi S; Ferro M; Matei DV; Renne G; de Cobelli O; Musi G
Urol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 38(12):929.e11-929.e19. PubMed ID: 32600928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fusion prostate biopsy outperforms 12-core systematic prostate biopsy in patients with prior negative systematic biopsy: A multi-institutional analysis.
Sidana A; Watson MJ; George AK; Rastinehad AR; Vourganti S; Rais-Bahrami S; Muthigi A; Maruf M; Gordetsky JB; Nix JW; Merino MJ; Turkbey B; Choyke PL; Wood BJ; Pinto PA
Urol Oncol; 2018 Jul; 36(7):341.e1-341.e7. PubMed ID: 29753548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of Sampling PI-RADS 4-5 Index Lesions Alone by MRI-guided In-bore Biopsy in Biopsy-naive Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy.
Kilic M; Vural M; Coskun B; Acar Ö; Saglican Y; Akpek S; Esen T
Eur Urol Focus; 2020 Mar; 6(2):249-254. PubMed ID: 31054811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Direct comparison between Grade Group assessed on systematic and MRI/ultrasound fusion targeted biopsies correlated to the radical prostatectomy specimens in patients with prostate cancer.
Payrard-Starck C; Fourcade A; An Nguyen T; Tissot V; Doucet L; Marolleau J; Lucas C; Fournier G; Valeri A
Prog Urol; 2023 Apr; 33(5):265-271. PubMed ID: 36740508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The added value of systematic biopsy in men with suspicion of prostate cancer undergoing multiparametric MRI-targeted biopsy.
Mannaerts CK; Kajtazovic A; Lodeizen OAP; Gayet M; Engelbrecht MRW; Jager GJ; Wijkstra H; de Reijke TM; Beerlage HP
Urol Oncol; 2019 May; 37(5):298.e1-298.e9. PubMed ID: 30660493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
