195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33867295)
1. Comparison between postoperative TRUS-CT fusion with MRI-CT fusion for postimplant quality assurance in prostate LDR permanent seed brachytherapy.
Tisseverasinghe S; Marbán M; Crook J; Petrik D; Araujo C
Brachytherapy; 2021; 20(4):849-856. PubMed ID: 33867295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of interobserver variability on transrectal ultrasonography-based postimplant dosimetry.
Xue J; Waterman F; Handler J; Gressen E
Brachytherapy; 2006; 5(3):174-82. PubMed ID: 16864069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interobserver variation in postimplant computed tomography contouring affects quality assessment of prostate brachytherapy.
Crook J; Milosevic M; Catton P; Yeung I; Haycocks T; Tran T; Catton C; McLean M; Panzarella T; Haider MA
Brachytherapy; 2002; 1(2):66-73. PubMed ID: 15062173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ultrasound-CT fusion compared with MR-CT fusion for postimplant dosimetry in permanent prostate brachytherapy.
Bowes D; Crook JM; Araujo C; Batchelar D
Brachytherapy; 2013; 12(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 22727473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of transrectal ultrasound- and computed tomography-based seed localization on postimplant dosimetry in prostate brachytherapy.
Chew MS; Xue J; Houser C; Misic V; Cao J; Cornwell T; Handler J; Yu Y; Gressen E
Brachytherapy; 2009; 8(2):255-264. PubMed ID: 19213606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Live implant dosimetry may be an effective replacement for postimplant computed tomography in localized prostate cancer patients receiving low dose rate brachytherapy.
Roshan D; Joyce K; Woulfe P; Gorakati PR; Stock R; Sullivan FJ
Brachytherapy; 2021; 20(4):873-882. PubMed ID: 33840634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Poor predictive value of intraoperative real-time dosimetry for prostate seed brachytherapy.
Igidbashian L; Donath D; Carrier JF; Lassalle S; Hervieux Y; David S; Bahary JP; Taussky D
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Oct; 72(2):605-9. PubMed ID: 18793964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sensitivity of clinically relevant dosimetric parameters to contouring uncertainty in postimplant dosimetry of low-dose-rate prostate permanent seed brachytherapy.
Mashouf S; Safigholi H; Merino T; Soliman A; Ravi A; Morton G; Song WY
Brachytherapy; 2016; 15(6):774-779. PubMed ID: 27720310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interobserver variability of 3.0-tesla and 1.5-tesla magnetic resonance imaging/computed tomography fusion image-based post-implant dosimetry of prostate brachytherapy.
Watanabe K; Katayama N; Katsui K; Matsushita T; Takamoto A; Ihara H; Nasu Y; Takemoto M; Kuroda M; Kanazawa S
J Radiat Res; 2019 Jul; 60(4):483-489. PubMed ID: 31083713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of 3 different postimplant dosimetry methods following permanent 125I prostate seed brachytherapy.
Marcu LG; Gowda R
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):309-14. PubMed ID: 23611630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of post-plan dosimetry using TRUS and CT after transperineal prostate seed implant.
Helmick R; Tarver R; Chan R; Caldwell S
Med Dosim; 2002; 27(4):289-93. PubMed ID: 12521076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intraoperative Registered Ultrasound and Fluoroscopy (iRUF) for dose calculation during prostate brachytherapy: Improved accuracy compared to standard ultrasound-based dosimetry.
Lee J; Mian OY; Le Y; Bae HJ; Burdette EC; DeWeese TL; Prince JL; Song DY
Radiother Oncol; 2017 Jul; 124(1):61-67. PubMed ID: 28647400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prostate brachytherapy intraoperative dosimetry using a combination of radiographic seed localization with a C-arm and deformed ultrasound prostate contours.
Golshan M; Mahdavi SS; Samei G; Lobo J; Pickles T; James Morris W; Keyes M; Peacock M; Salcudean SE; Spadinger I
Brachytherapy; 2020; 19(5):589-598. PubMed ID: 32682777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of the feasibility of using transrectal ultrasound for postimplant dosimetry in low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.
Davies RS; Perrett T; Powell J; Barber J; Tanguay J; Button M; Cochlin D; Smith C; Lester JF
Med Dosim; 2016 Winter; 41(4):290-295. PubMed ID: 27623391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of selection of post-implant technique on dosimetry parameters for permanent prostate implants.
Haworth A; Ebert M; St Clair S; Carey BM; Flynn A; Bottomley DM; Duchesne GM; Joseph D; Ash D
Brachytherapy; 2005; 4(2):146-53. PubMed ID: 15893269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prostate post-implant dosimetry: interobserver variability in seed localisation, contouring and fusion.
De Brabandere M; Hoskin P; Haustermans K; Van den Heuvel F; Siebert FA
Radiother Oncol; 2012 Aug; 104(2):192-8. PubMed ID: 22857857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Importance of the CT/MRI fusion method as a learning tool for CT-based postimplant dosimetry in prostate brachytherapy.
Tanaka O; Hayashi S; Sakurai K; Matsuo M; Nakano M; Maeda S; Hoshi H; Deguchi T
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Dec; 81(3):303-8. PubMed ID: 17125859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of MRI-based and CT/MRI fusion-based postimplant dosimetric analysis of prostate brachytherapy.
Tanaka O; Hayashi S; Matsuo M; Sakurai K; Nakano M; Maeda S; Kajita K; Deguchi T; Hoshi H
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Oct; 66(2):597-602. PubMed ID: 16966002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Intraoperative and post-implant dosimetry in patients treated with permanent prostate implant brachytherapy].
Herein A; Ágoston P; Szabó Z; Jorgo K; Markgruber B; Pesznyák C; Polgár C; Major T
Magy Onkol; 2015 Jun; 59(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 26035163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MRI-based preplanning in low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.
Tanaka O; Hayashi S; Matsuo M; Nakano M; Kubota Y; Maeda S; Ohtakara K; Deguchi T; Hoshi H
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jul; 88(1):115-20. PubMed ID: 17933407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
