125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33867436)
1. Dosimetry in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Evaluated by Monte Carlo Technique.
Alves MS; Belinato W; Santos WS; Galeano DC; Neves LP; Perini AP; N Souza D
Health Phys; 2021 Jul; 121(1):18-29. PubMed ID: 33867436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dosimetric characterization and organ dose assessment in digital breast tomosynthesis: Measurements and Monte Carlo simulations using voxel phantoms.
Baptista M; Di Maria S; Barros S; Figueira C; Sarmento M; Orvalho L; Vaz P
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3788-800. PubMed ID: 26133581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of different exposure parameters on radiation dose in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: A phantom study.
Asbeutah AM; Brindhaban A; AlMajran AA; Asbeutah SA
Radiography (Lond); 2020 Aug; 26(3):e129-e133. PubMed ID: 32052759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of the uterine dose in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.
Cepeda Martins AR; Di Maria S; Afonso J; Pereira M; Pereira J; Vaz P
Radiography (Lond); 2022 May; 28(2):333-339. PubMed ID: 34565679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multiscale Monte Carlo simulations for dosimetry in x-ray breast imaging: Part I - Macroscopic scales.
Massera RT; Tomal A; Thomson RM
Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 51(2):1105-1116. PubMed ID: 38156766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparisons of glandular breast dose between digital mammography, tomosynthesis and breast CT based on anthropomorphic patient-derived breast phantoms.
Sarno A; Mettivier G; Bliznakova K; Hernandez AM; Boone JM; Russo P
Phys Med; 2022 May; 97():50-58. PubMed ID: 35395535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Normalized glandular dose coefficients for digital breast tomosynthesis systems with a homogeneous breast model.
Sarno A; Tucciariello RM; Mettivier G; Del Sarto D; Fantacci ME; Russo P
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Mar; 66(6):065024. PubMed ID: 33535193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dose coefficients for organ dosimetry in tomosynthesis imaging of adults and pediatrics across diverse protocols.
Sharma S; Kapadia A; Ria F; Segars WP; Samei E
Med Phys; 2022 Aug; 49(8):5439-5450. PubMed ID: 35690885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Monte Carlo study on optimal breast voxel resolution for dosimetry estimates in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Fedon C; Rabin C; Caballo M; Diaz O; García E; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; González-Sprinberg GA; Sechopoulos I
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Dec; 64(1):015003. PubMed ID: 30524034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Monte Carlo simulation for the estimation of the glandular breast dose for a digital breast tomosynthesis system.
Rodrigues L; Magalhaes LA; Braz D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Dec; 167(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 25480841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. DOSIMETRY IN DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS: COST-EFFICIENT APPROACH FOR THE SOUTH AMERICAN PERSPECTIVES.
Pirchio R; Pérez GN; Ratto SS; Stefanic AM
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2022 Jun; 198(7):393-404. PubMed ID: 35527472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. COMPARISON OF SPECTRA AND MEAN GLANDULAR DOSE WITH TUBE VOLTAGES USED IN DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS FROM SIMULATED, METROLOGICAL AND CLINICAL CASES.
da Silveira Gatto LB; Braz D; Pacifico L; Travassos P; Magalhaes LAG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Dec; 192(3):402-412. PubMed ID: 33320943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: Glandular dose estimation using a Monte Carlo code and voxel phantom.
Tzamicha E; Yakoumakis E; Tsalafoutas IA; Dimitriadis A; Georgiou E; Tsapaki V; Chalazonitis A
Phys Med; 2015 Nov; 31(7):785-91. PubMed ID: 25900891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CHARACTERISATION OF TLDS-200 AND OSLDS AT LOW X-RAY ENERGIES AND DETERMINATION OF EYE LENS DOSE, THYROID DOSE AND MEAN GLANDULAR DOSE DURING STANDARD MAMMOGRAPHY AND TOMOSYNTHESIS.
Pirchio R; Stefanic A; Rojas RR
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 186(4):469-478. PubMed ID: 31329992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimal photon energy comparison between digital breast tomosynthesis and mammography: a case study.
Di Maria S; Baptista M; Felix M; Oliveira N; Matela N; Janeiro L; Vaz P; Orvalho L; Silva A
Phys Med; 2014 Jun; 30(4):482-8. PubMed ID: 24613514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical digital breast tomosynthesis system: dosimetric characterization.
Feng SS; Sechopoulos I
Radiology; 2012 Apr; 263(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 22332070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dataset of patient-derived digital breast phantoms for in silico studies in breast computed tomography, digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography.
Sarno A; Mettivier G; di Franco F; Varallo A; Bliznakova K; Hernandez AM; Boone JM; Russo P
Med Phys; 2021 May; 48(5):2682-2693. PubMed ID: 33683711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multiscale Monte Carlo simulations for dosimetry in x-ray breast imaging: Part II - Microscopic scales.
Massera RT; Tomal A; Thomson RM
Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 51(2):1117-1126. PubMed ID: 38146824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cancer risk estimation in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis using GEANT4 Monte Carlo simulations and voxel phantoms.
Ferreira P; Baptista M; Di Maria S; Vaz P
Phys Med; 2016 May; 32(5):717-23. PubMed ID: 27133140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
