196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33868850)
1. Interspinous Process (ISP) Devices in Comparison to the Use of Traditional Posterior Spinal Instrumentation.
Faulkner JE; Khalifeh K; Hara J; Ozgur B
Cureus; 2021 Mar; 13(3):e13886. PubMed ID: 33868850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical evaluation of lateral lumbar interbody fusion with secondary augmentation.
Reis MT; Reyes PM; Bse ; Altun I; Newcomb AG; Singh V; Chang SW; Kelly BP; Crawford NR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):720-726. PubMed ID: 27391398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine.
Harris BM; Hilibrand AS; Savas PE; Pellegrino A; Vaccaro AR; Siegler S; Albert TJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Feb; 29(4):E65-70. PubMed ID: 15094547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Less invasive posterior fixation method following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a biomechanical analysis.
Slucky AV; Brodke DS; Bachus KN; Droge JA; Braun JT
Spine J; 2006; 6(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 16413452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Iliac screws may not be necessary in long-segment constructs with L5-S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion: cadaveric study of stability and instrumentation strain.
Hlubek RJ; Godzik J; Newcomb AGUS; Lehrman JN; de Andrada B; Bohl MA; Farber SH; Kelly BP; Turner JD
Spine J; 2019 May; 19(5):942-950. PubMed ID: 30419290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MI-TLIF): A Video Technique Guide.
Saela S; Pompliano M; Varghese J; Sinha K; Faloon M; Emami A
JBJS Essent Surg Tech; 2023; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 38380431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical analysis of an expandable lateral cage and a static transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage with posterior instrumentation in an in vitro spondylolisthesis model.
Mantell M; Cyriac M; Haines CM; Gudipally M; O'Brien JR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jan; 24(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 26384133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Finite Element Analysis of a New Pedicle Screw-Plate System for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
Li J; Shang J; Zhou Y; Li C; Liu H
PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0144637. PubMed ID: 26649749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bilateral pedicle screw fixation provides superior biomechanical stability in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element study.
Ambati DV; Wright EK; Lehman RA; Kang DG; Wagner SC; Dmitriev AE
Spine J; 2015 Aug; 15(8):1812-22. PubMed ID: 24983669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interspinous-Interbody Fusion via a Strictly Lateral Surgical Approach: A Biomechanical Stabilization Comparison to Constructs Requiring Both Lateral and Posterior Approaches.
Hedman TP; Ohnmeiss DD; Leasure J; Raji OR; Hochschuler SH
Cureus; 2023 Jul; 15(7):e41918. PubMed ID: 37583745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stability of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the setting of retained facets and posterior fixation using transfacet or standard pedicle screws.
Chin KR; Reis MT; Reyes PM; Newcomb AG; Neagoe A; Gabriel JP; Sung RD; Crawford NR
Spine J; 2015 May; 15(5):1077-82. PubMed ID: 24210638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical Analysis of Cortical Versus Pedicle Screw Fixation Stability in TLIF, PLIF, and XLIF Applications.
Nomoto EK; Fogel GR; Rasouli A; Bundy JV; Turner AW
Global Spine J; 2019 Apr; 9(2):162-168. PubMed ID: 30984495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic-Assisted Single-Position Prone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes.
Shafi K; Lovecchio F; Song J; Qureshi S
JBJS Essent Surg Tech; 2023; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 38357472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanics of posterior instrumentation in L1-L3 lateral interbody fusion: Pedicle screw rod construct vs. transfacet pedicle screws.
Chin KR; Newcomb AG; Reis MT; Reyes PM; Hickam GA; Gabriel J; Pencle FJ; Sung RD; Crawford NR
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2016 Jan; 31():59-64. PubMed ID: 26499776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Endoscopic transforaminal decompression, interbody fusion, and percutaneous pedicle screw implantation of the lumbar spine: A case series report.
Osman SG
Int J Spine Surg; 2012; 6():157-66. PubMed ID: 25694885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adjacent-segment effects of lumbar cortical screw-rod fixation versus pedicle screw-rod fixation with and without interbody support.
Wangsawatwong P; Sawa AGU; de Andrada Pereira B; Lehrman JN; O'Neill LK; Turner JD; Uribe JS; Kelly BP
J Neurosurg Spine; 2021 Jun; 35(3):263-269. PubMed ID: 34144524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical evaluation of interbody fixation with secondary augmentation: lateral lumbar interbody fusion versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Godzik J; Kalb S; Reis MT; Reyes PM; Singh V; Newcomb AGUS; Chang SW; Kelly BP; Crawford NR
J Spine Surg; 2018 Jun; 4(2):180-186. PubMed ID: 30069505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical analysis of lateral interbody fusion strategies for adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine.
Metzger MF; Robinson ST; Maldonado RC; Rawlinson J; Liu J; Acosta FL
Spine J; 2017 Jul; 17(7):1004-1011. PubMed ID: 28323239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical analysis of a novel posterior construct in a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion model an in vitro study.
Sethi A; Muzumdar AM; Ingalhalikar A; Vaidya R
Spine J; 2011 Sep; 11(9):863-9. PubMed ID: 21802998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical assessment of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anterior lumbosacral fixation screw-plate: comparison to stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and anterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in an unstable human cadaver model.
Gerber M; Crawford NR; Chamberlain RH; Fifield MS; LeHuec JC; Dickman CA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(7):762-8. PubMed ID: 16582849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
