These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33869351)

  • 1. STEM/Non-STEM Divide Structures Undergraduate Beliefs About Gender and Talent in Academia.
    Bailey KA; Horacek D; Worthington S; Nanthakumar A; Preston S; Ilie CC
    Front Sociol; 2019; 4():26. PubMed ID: 33869351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Women are underrepresented in fields where success is believed to require brilliance.
    Meyer M; Cimpian A; Leslie SJ
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():235. PubMed ID: 25814964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines.
    Leslie SJ; Cimpian A; Meyer M; Freeland E
    Science; 2015 Jan; 347(6219):262-5. PubMed ID: 25593183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Frequency of "Brilliant" and "Genius" in Teaching Evaluations Predicts the Representation of Women and African Americans across Fields.
    Storage D; Horne Z; Cimpian A; Leslie SJ
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0150194. PubMed ID: 26938242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. "You need to be super smart to do well in math!" Young children's field-specific ability beliefs.
    Jenifer JB; Jaxon J; Levine SC; Cimpian A
    Dev Sci; 2024 Jan; 27(1):e13429. PubMed ID: 37400969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Field-specific ability beliefs as an explanation for gender differences in academics' career trajectories: Evidence from public profiles on ORCID.Org.
    Hannak A; Joseph K; Larremore DB; Cimpian A
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2023 Oct; 125(4):681-698. PubMed ID: 37347899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Beliefs in "Brilliance" and Belonging Uncertainty in Male and Female STEM Students.
    Deiglmayr A; Stern E; Schubert R
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():1114. PubMed ID: 31191382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gender stereotypes and incremental beliefs in STEM and non-STEM students in three countries: relationships with performance in cognitive tasks.
    Moè A; Hausmann M; Hirnstein M
    Psychol Res; 2021 Mar; 85(2):554-567. PubMed ID: 31960121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Equal Representation Does Not Mean Equal Opportunity: Women Academics Perceive a Thicker Glass Ceiling in Social and Behavioral Fields Than in the Natural Sciences and Economics.
    van Veelen R; Derks B
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():790211. PubMed ID: 35369222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How harassment is depriving universities of talent: a national survey of STEM academics in the UK.
    Litzellachner LF; Barnett J; Yeomans L; Blackwood L
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1212545. PubMed ID: 38348111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Undergraduate Lay Theories of Abilities: Mindset, universality, and brilliance beliefs uniquely predict undergraduate educational outcomes.
    Limeri LB; Carter NT; Lyra F; Martin J; Mastronardo H; Patel J; Dolan EL
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2023 Dec; 22(4):ar40. PubMed ID: 37751502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Women in Academic Science: A Changing Landscape.
    Ceci SJ; Ginther DK; Kahn S; Williams WM
    Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2014 Dec; 15(3):75-141. PubMed ID: 26172066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rethinking Giftedness and Gifted Education: A Proposed Direction Forward Based on Psychological Science.
    Subotnik RF; Olszewski-Kubilius P; Worrell FC
    Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2011 Jan; 12(1):3-54. PubMed ID: 26168418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Academics as Agentic Superheroes: Female academics' lack of fit with the agentic stereotype of success limits their career advancement.
    Van Veelen R; Derks B
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2022 Jul; 61(3):748-767. PubMed ID: 34935167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The perceived role fit of women and men academics: evidence from the social sports sciences.
    Lesch L; Scharfenkamp K; Wicker P
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1239944. PubMed ID: 38054178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. U.S. Women Faculty in the Social Sciences Also Face Gender Inequalities.
    Casad BJ; Garasky CE; Jancetic TR; Brown AK; Franks JE; Bach CR
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():792756. PubMed ID: 35693519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. WOMEN IN SCIENCE. Response to Comment on "Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines".
    Cimpian A; Leslie SJ
    Science; 2015 Jul; 349(6246):391. PubMed ID: 26206927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The stereotype that girls lack talent: A worldwide investigation.
    Napp C; Breda T
    Sci Adv; 2022 Mar; 8(10):eabm3689. PubMed ID: 35263142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Envisaging the use of evidence-based practice (EBP): how nurse academics facilitate EBP use in theory and practice across Australian undergraduate programmes.
    Malik G; McKenna L; Griffiths D
    J Clin Nurs; 2017 Sep; 26(17-18):2669-2679. PubMed ID: 28029741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Professors Prioritize Increasing Female Retention in Academic Physics Over Advisee's Interests.
    Bailey K; Horacek D; Worthington S; Schmitz M
    Front Sociol; 2021; 6():751703. PubMed ID: 35187154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.