These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33870060)
1. The Limits of Conventional Justification: Inductive Risk and Industry Bias Beyond Conventionalism. Ohnesorge M Front Res Metr Anal; 2020; 5():599506. PubMed ID: 33870060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. From positivism to conventionalism: Comte, Renouvier, and Poincaré. Schmaus W Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2020 Apr; 80():102-109. PubMed ID: 32383667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Industry Bias in Randomized Controlled Trials in General and Abdominal Surgery: An Empirical Study. Probst P; Knebel P; Grummich K; Tenckhoff S; Ulrich A; Büchler MW; Diener MK Ann Surg; 2016 Jul; 264(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 26465782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Socialism Order of Worth and Analytical Adequacy Axiom. Schneijderberg C Hum Stud; 2022; 45(2):283-308. PubMed ID: 35729948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Public scientific testimony in the scientific image. Gerken M Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2020 Apr; 80():90-101. PubMed ID: 32383678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Why Reichenbach wasn't entirely wrong, and Poincaré was almost right, about geometric conventionalism. Duerr PM; Ben-Menahem Y Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2022 Dec; 96():154-173. PubMed ID: 36334437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Characterising bias in regulatory risk and decision analysis: An analysis of heuristics applied in health technology appraisal, chemicals regulation, and climate change governance. MacGillivray BH Environ Int; 2017 Aug; 105():20-33. PubMed ID: 28499120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Conventionalism about what? Where Duhem and Poincaré part ways. Ivanova M Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2015 Dec; 54():80-9. PubMed ID: 26568090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. From therapeutic trials to current practice. van Gijn J Rev Neurol (Paris); 1999; 155(9):708-12. PubMed ID: 10528354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The vitalism of Paul-Joseph Barthez (1734-1806)]. Han HJ Uisahak; 2010 Jun; 19(1):157-88. PubMed ID: 20671403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Empirical evaluation and justification of methodologies in psychological science. Proctor RW; Capaldi EJ Psychol Bull; 2001 Nov; 127(6):759-72. PubMed ID: 11726070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The relationship between study sponsorship, risks of bias, and research outcomes in atrazine exposure studies conducted in non-human animals: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Bero L; Anglemyer A; Vesterinen H; Krauth D Environ Int; 2016; 92-93():597-604. PubMed ID: 26694022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Problem-solving in science. Woodruff M Ciba Found Symp; 1976; (44):97-114. PubMed ID: 1052071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A reappraisal of economic evaluation of pharmaceuticals. Science or marketing? Drummond MF Pharmacoeconomics; 1998 Jul; 14(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 10182189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The importance of preservation of the ethical principle of equipoise in the design of clinical trials: relative impact of the methodological quality domains on the treatment effect in randomized controlled trials. Djulbegovic B; Cantor A; Clarke M Account Res; 2003; 10(4):301-15. PubMed ID: 14989285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is Scientific Medical Literature Related to Endometriosis Treatment Evidence-Based? A Systematic Review on Methodological Quality of Randomized Clinical Trials. Capraş RD; Urda-Cîmpean AE; Bolboacă SD Medicina (Kaunas); 2019 Jul; 55(7):. PubMed ID: 31311075 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Interpreting evidence in general practice: Bias and conflicts of interest. Parker L; Grundy Q; Bero L Aust J Gen Pract; 2018 Jun; 47(6):337-340. PubMed ID: 29966180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A threat rather than a resource: why voicing internal criticism is difficult in international organisations. Christian B J Int Relat Dev (Ljubl); 2022; 25(2):425-449. PubMed ID: 34629944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The commercialization of the biomedical sciences: (mis)understanding bias. de Melo-Martín I Hist Philos Life Sci; 2019 Sep; 41(3):34. PubMed ID: 31485872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]