These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33871836)

  • 1. Bias in Clinical Research.
    Stuckless S; Parfrey PS
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2249():17-34. PubMed ID: 33871836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bias in clinical studies of genetic diseases.
    Stuckless S; Parfrey PS
    Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 473():171-86. PubMed ID: 19160738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical genetic research 1: Bias.
    Stuckless S; Parfrey PS
    Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1281():333-48. PubMed ID: 25694320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Definitions of Bias in Clinical Research.
    Warden G
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2249():35-52. PubMed ID: 33871837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multiple-bias Sensitivity Analysis Using Bounds.
    Smith LH; Mathur MB; VanderWeele TJ
    Epidemiology; 2021 Sep; 32(5):625-634. PubMed ID: 34224471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving the evidence base in surgery: sources of bias in surgical studies.
    Young JM; Solomon MJ
    ANZ J Surg; 2003 Jul; 73(7):504-6. PubMed ID: 12864825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Distinguishing Selection Bias and Confounding Bias in Comparative Effectiveness Research.
    Haneuse S
    Med Care; 2016 Apr; 54(4):e23-9. PubMed ID: 24309675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Classification, direction, and prevention of bias in epidemiologic research.
    Choi BC; Noseworthy AL
    J Occup Med; 1992 Mar; 34(3):265-71. PubMed ID: 1545278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bounding formulas for selection bias.
    Huang TH; Lee WC
    Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Nov; 182(10):868-72. PubMed ID: 26519426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of Confounding and Selection Bias in Epidemiological Studies of Populations Exposed to Low-Dose, High-Energy Photon Radiation.
    Schubauer-Berigan MK; Berrington de Gonzalez A; Cardis E; Laurier D; Lubin JH; Hauptmann M; Richardson DB
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2020 Jul; 2020(56):133-153. PubMed ID: 32657349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sources of confounding in life course epidemiology.
    Santos S; Zugna D; Pizzi C; Richiardi L
    J Dev Orig Health Dis; 2019 Jun; 10(3):299-305. PubMed ID: 30111382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Where to look for the most frequent biases?
    Jager KJ; Tripepi G; Chesnaye NC; Dekker FW; Zoccali C; Stel VS
    Nephrology (Carlton); 2020 Jun; 25(6):435-441. PubMed ID: 32133725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bounding Bias Due to Selection.
    Smith LH; VanderWeele TJ
    Epidemiology; 2019 Jul; 30(4):509-516. PubMed ID: 31033690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Limits for the Magnitude of M-bias and Certain Other Types of Structural Selection Bias.
    Flanders WD; Ye D
    Epidemiology; 2019 Jul; 30(4):501-508. PubMed ID: 31033689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantitative bias analysis for study and grant planning.
    Fox MP; Lash TL
    Ann Epidemiol; 2020 Mar; 43():32-36. PubMed ID: 32113733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bias and causal associations in observational research.
    Grimes DA; Schulz KF
    Lancet; 2002 Jan; 359(9302):248-52. PubMed ID: 11812579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reflection on modern methods: causal inference considerations for heterogeneous disease etiology.
    Nevo D; Ogino S; Wang M
    Int J Epidemiol; 2021 Jul; 50(3):1030-1037. PubMed ID: 33484125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Threats to validity of nonrandomized studies of postdiagnosis exposures on cancer recurrence and survival.
    Chubak J; Boudreau DM; Wirtz HS; McKnight B; Weiss NS
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Oct; 105(19):1456-62. PubMed ID: 23940288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Epidemiologic studies: pitfalls in interpretation.
    Westhoff CL
    Dialogues Contracept; 1995; 4(5):5-6, 8. PubMed ID: 12288680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The collection and interpretation of epidemiological data about the cardiovascular risks associated with the use of steroid contraceptives.
    Hannaford P
    Contraception; 1998 Mar; 57(3):137-42. PubMed ID: 9617530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.