152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33872967)
1. CT-based structural analyses of vertebral fractures with polymeric augmentation: A study of cadaveric three-level spine segments.
Rezaei A; Giambini H; Miller Ii AL; Xu H; Xu H; Li Y; Yaszemski MJ; Lu L
Comput Biol Med; 2021 Jun; 133():104395. PubMed ID: 33872967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Specimen-specific nonlinear finite element modeling to predict vertebrae fracture loads after vertebroplasty.
Matsuura Y; Giambini H; Ogawa Y; Fang Z; Thoreson AR; Yaszemski MJ; Lu L; An KN
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Oct; 39(22):E1291-6. PubMed ID: 25077904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-dimensional surface strain analyses of simulated defect and augmented spine segments: A biomechanical cadaveric study.
Rezaei A; Tilton M; Giambini H; Li Y; Hooke A; Miller Ii AL; Yaszemski MJ; Lu L
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Jul; 119():104559. PubMed ID: 33915439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical evaluation of calcium phosphate-based nanocomposite versus polymethylmethacrylate cement for percutaneous kyphoplasty.
Lu Q; Liu C; Wang D; Liu H; Yang H; Yang L
Spine J; 2019 Nov; 19(11):1871-1884. PubMed ID: 31202837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical changes after the augmentation of experimental osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in the cadaveric thoracic spine.
Kayanja MM; Togawa D; Lieberman IH
Spine J; 2005; 5(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 15653085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical evaluation of an injectable and biodegradable copolymer P(PF-co-CL) in a cadaveric vertebral body defect model.
Fang Z; Giambini H; Zeng H; Camp JJ; Dadsetan M; Robb RA; An KN; Yaszemski MJ; Lu L
Tissue Eng Part A; 2014 Mar; 20(5-6):1096-102. PubMed ID: 24256208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prophylactic vertebroplasty may reduce the risk of adjacent intact vertebra from fatigue injury: an ex vivo biomechanical study.
Chiang CK; Wang YH; Yang CY; Yang BD; Wang JL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Feb; 34(4):356-64. PubMed ID: 19214094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A biomechanical investigation of vertebroplasty in osteoporotic compression fractures and in prophylactic vertebral reinforcement.
Furtado N; Oakland RJ; Wilcox RK; Hall RM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Aug; 32(17):E480-7. PubMed ID: 17762281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical evaluation of an injectable calcium phosphate cement for vertebroplasty.
Lim TH; Brebach GT; Renner SM; Kim WJ; Kim JG; Lee RE; Andersson GB; An HS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Jun; 27(12):1297-302. PubMed ID: 12065977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Preliminary biomechanical evaluation of prophylactic vertebral reinforcement adjacent to vertebroplasty under cyclic loading.
Oakland RJ; Furtado NR; Wilcox RK; Timothy J; Hall RM
Spine J; 2009 Feb; 9(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 18640876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Vertebroplasty plus short segment pedicle screw fixation in a burst fracture model in cadaveric spines.
Grossbach AJ; Viljoen SV; Hitchon PW; DeVries Watson NA; Grosland NM; Torner J
J Clin Neurosci; 2015 May; 22(5):883-8. PubMed ID: 25769251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How are adjacent spinal levels affected by vertebral fracture and by vertebroplasty? A biomechanical study on cadaveric spines.
Luo J; Annesley-Williams DJ; Adams MA; Dolan P
Spine J; 2017 Jun; 17(6):863-874. PubMed ID: 28167249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical comparison of vertebral augmentation with silicone and PMMA cement and two filling grades.
Schulte TL; Keiler A; Riechelmann F; Lange T; Schmoelz W
Eur Spine J; 2013 Dec; 22(12):2695-701. PubMed ID: 23880868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of vertebroplasty on the compressive strength of vertebral bodies.
Pneumaticos SG; Triantafyllopoulos GK; Evangelopoulos DS; Hipp JA; Heggeness MH
Spine J; 2013 Dec; 13(12):1921-7. PubMed ID: 23981817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adjacent vertebral failure after vertebroplasty: a biomechanical study of low-modulus PMMA cement.
Boger A; Heini P; Windolf M; Schneider E
Eur Spine J; 2007 Dec; 16(12):2118-25. PubMed ID: 17713795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Single-level subject-specific finite element model can predict fracture outcomes in three-level spine segments under different loading rates.
Rezaei A; Tilton M; Li Y; Yaszemski MJ; Lu L
Comput Biol Med; 2021 Oct; 137():104833. PubMed ID: 34534795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Experimental and computational approach investigating burst fracture augmentation using PMMA and calcium phosphate cements.
Tarsuslugil SM; O'Hara RM; Dunne NJ; Buchanan FJ; Orr JF; Barton DC; Wilcox RK
Ann Biomed Eng; 2014 Apr; 42(4):751-62. PubMed ID: 24395013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Vertebroplasty with high-viscosity polymethylmethacrylate cement facilitates vertebral body restoration in vitro.
Rüger M; Schmoelz W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov; 34(24):2619-25. PubMed ID: 19881400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Noninvasive Failure Load Prediction of Vertebrae with Simulated Lytic Defects and Biomaterial Augmentation.
Giambini H; Fang Z; Zeng H; Camp JJ; Yaszemski MJ; Lu L
Tissue Eng Part C Methods; 2016 Aug; 22(8):717-24. PubMed ID: 27260559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiofrequency-targeted vertebral augmentation versus traditional balloon kyphoplasty: radiographic and morphologic outcomes of an ex vivo biomechanical pilot study.
Dalton BE; Kohm AC; Miller LE; Block JE; Poser RD
Clin Interv Aging; 2012; 7():525-31. PubMed ID: 23204845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
