These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
317 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33873247)
1. Word Senses as Clusters of Meaning Modulations: A Computational Model of Polysemy. Li J; Joanisse MF Cogn Sci; 2021 Apr; 45(4):e12955. PubMed ID: 33873247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Probing Lexical Ambiguity: Word Vectors Encode Number and Relatedness of Senses. Beekhuizen B; Armstrong BC; Stevenson S Cogn Sci; 2021 May; 45(5):e12943. PubMed ID: 34018227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Opposing effects of semantic diversity in lexical and semantic relatedness decisions. Hoffman P; Woollams AM J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Apr; 41(2):385-402. PubMed ID: 25751041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Polysemy and the subjective lexicon: semantic relatedness and the salience of intraword senses. Durkin K; Manning J J Psycholinguist Res; 1989 Nov; 18(6):577-612. PubMed ID: 2632800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Brain representations of lexical ambiguity: Disentangling homonymy, polysemy, and their meanings. Liang X; Huang F; Liu D; Xu M Brain Lang; 2024 Jun; 253():105426. PubMed ID: 38815503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The truth about chickens and bats: ambiguity avoidance distinguishes types of polysemy. Rabagliati H; Snedeker J Psychol Sci; 2013 Jul; 24(7):1354-60. PubMed ID: 23722978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sustained meaning activation for polysemous but not homonymous words: evidence from EEG. MacGregor LJ; Bouwsema J; Klepousniotou E Neuropsychologia; 2015 Feb; 68():126-38. PubMed ID: 25576909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The representation of polysemy: MEG evidence. Pylkkänen L; Llinás R; Murphy GL J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Jan; 18(1):97-109. PubMed ID: 16417686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Children make use of relationships across meanings in word learning. Floyd S; Goldberg AE J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Jan; 47(1):29-44. PubMed ID: 32105145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Probing the Representational Structure of Regular Polysemy via Sense Analogy Questions: Insights from Contextual Word Vectors. Li J; Armstrong BC Cogn Sci; 2024 Mar; 48(3):e13416. PubMed ID: 38482721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Determining the Relativity of Word Meanings Through the Construction of Individualized Models of Semantic Memory. Johns BT Cogn Sci; 2024 Feb; 48(2):e13413. PubMed ID: 38402448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The influence of semantic richness on the visual recognition of emotional words]. Syssau A; Laxén J Can J Exp Psychol; 2012 Mar; 66(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 22390477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The complex interactions of context availability, polysemy, word frequency, and orthographic variables during lexical processing. Rice CA; Tokowicz N; Fraundorf SH; Liburd TL Mem Cognit; 2019 Oct; 47(7):1297-1313. PubMed ID: 31001796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Polysemy in Sentence Comprehension: Effects of Meaning Dominance. Foraker S; Murphy GL J Mem Lang; 2012 Nov; 67(4):407-425. PubMed ID: 23185103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Semantic diversity: a measure of semantic ambiguity based on variability in the contextual usage of words. Hoffman P; Lambon Ralph MA; Rogers TT Behav Res Methods; 2013 Sep; 45(3):718-30. PubMed ID: 23239067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Making sense of word senses: the comprehension of polysemy depends on sense overlap. Klepousniotou E; Titone D; Romero C J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1534-43. PubMed ID: 18980412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Settling Into Semantic Space: An Ambiguity-Focused Account of Word-Meaning Access. Rodd JM Perspect Psychol Sci; 2020 Mar; 15(2):411-427. PubMed ID: 31961780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diversity of narrative context disrupts the early stage of learning the meanings of novel words. Hulme RC; Begum A; Nation K; Rodd JM Psychon Bull Rev; 2023 Dec; 30(6):2338-2350. PubMed ID: 37369974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Polysemy Advantage with Abstract But Not Concrete Words. Jager B; Cleland AA J Psycholinguist Res; 2016 Feb; 45(1):143-56. PubMed ID: 25373555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]