These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3387541)
1. [Radiation protection in childhood. International recommendations on the question of radiation exposure in childhood and adolescence]. Stieve FE Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1988; 29(1):143-55. PubMed ID: 3387541 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Radiation exposure in childhood and adolescence from x-ray diagnosis procedures--experience and inferences]. Menzel B; Kraus W Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1988; 29(1):157-67. PubMed ID: 3387542 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Recommendations for minor updates to the IRPA 1985 guidelines on limits of exposure to laser radiation. International Non-Ionizing Radiation Committee of the International Radiation Protection Association. Health Phys; 1988 May; 54(5):573-4. PubMed ID: 3360615 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Proposed change to the IRPA 1985 guidelines on limits of exposure to ultraviolet radiation. International Non-ionizing Radiation Committee of the International Radiation Protection Association. Health Phys; 1989 Jun; 56(6):971-2. PubMed ID: 2722526 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Consequences of the new international radiation protection recommendations for national radiation protection regulations in medicine]. Kraus W Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1984; 25(4):461-74. PubMed ID: 6484157 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Estimation of organ doses during standardized x-ray examinations in childhood]. Tautz M; Brandt GA Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1988; 29(1):169-79. PubMed ID: 3387543 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. 21st century challenges in radiation protection and shielding: draft 2005 recommendations of ICRP. Clarke R; Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):10-5. PubMed ID: 16381676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Should ICRP have prescribed an averaging period for the occupational dose limit in its basic general recommendations? Fry RM; Carter MW Health Phys; 1993 Mar; 64(3):319-20. PubMed ID: 8432652 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. New ICRP recommendations. Wrixon AD J Radiol Prot; 2008 Jun; 28(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 18495983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On the recommendations of ICRP/90/G-01. Dennis JA Radiat Res; 1990 Sep; 123(3):349-50. PubMed ID: 2217732 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The evolution of the system of radiological protection: the justification for new ICRP recommendations. J Radiol Prot; 2003 Jun; 23(2):129-42. PubMed ID: 12875546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. For better ICRP recommendations on the radiological protection system. Fujimoto K J Radiol Prot; 2005 Sep; 25(3):331-2. PubMed ID: 16286697 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Consequences of the recommendations of the ICRP]. Jacobi W Strahlenschutz Forsch Prax; 1988; 30():121-35. PubMed ID: 3222795 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A commentary on some inconsistencies in the icrp 2005 recommendations: exclusion levels. Kramer GH Health Phys; 2006 Jul; 91(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 16775474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [International recommendations and guidelines--old and new facts]. Stieve FE Strahlenschutz Forsch Prax; 1985; 26():150-67. PubMed ID: 4089900 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of the draft 2005 recommendations of ICRP on secondary derived regulatory values being considered by the US Department of Energy. O'Connell P Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 118(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 16105895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]