These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33875672)

  • 1. Development and virtual validation of a novel digital workflow to rehabilitate palatal defects by using smartphone-integrated stereophotogrammetry (SPINS).
    Farook TH; Jamayet NB; Asif JA; Din AS; Mahyuddin MN; Alam MK
    Sci Rep; 2021 Apr; 11(1):8469. PubMed ID: 33875672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of accuracy of photogrammetry with 3D scanning and conventional impression method for craniomaxillofacial defects using a software analysis.
    Beri A; Pisulkar SK; Bagde AD; Bansod A; Dahihandekar C; Paikrao B
    Trials; 2022 Dec; 23(1):1048. PubMed ID: 36575547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A virtual analysis of the precision and accuracy of 3-dimensional ear casts generated from smartphone camera images.
    Farook TH; Rashid F; Jamayet NB; Abdullah JY; Dudley J; Khursheed Alam M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):830-836. PubMed ID: 33642077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the Differences Between Conventional and Digitally Developed Models Used for Prosthetic Rehabilitation in a Case of Untreated Palatal Cleft.
    Beh YH; Farook TH; Jamayet NB; Dudley J; Rashid F; Barman A; Alam MK
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2021 Mar; 58(3):386-390. PubMed ID: 32808548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Designing 3D prosthetic templates for maxillofacial defect rehabilitation: A comparative analysis of different virtual workflows.
    Farook TH; Jamayet NB; Abdullah JY; Asif JA; Rajion ZA; Alam MK
    Comput Biol Med; 2020 Mar; 118():103646. PubMed ID: 32174323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Generation and evaluation of 3D digital casts of maxillary defects based on multisource data registration: A pilot clinical study.
    Ye H; Ma Q; Hou Y; Li M; Zhou Y
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Dec; 118(6):790-795. PubMed ID: 28449864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital workflow and virtual validation of a 3D-printed definitive hollow obturator for a large palatal defect.
    Jamayet NB; Farook TH; Al-Oulabi A; Johari Y; Patil PG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 May; 129(5):798-804. PubMed ID: 34635339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A smartphone photogrammetry method for digitizing prosthetic socket interiors.
    Hernandez A; Lemaire E
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Apr; 41(2):210-214. PubMed ID: 27613588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-Dimensional Printing: A Novel Approach to the Creation of Obturator Prostheses Following Palatal Resection for Malignant Palate Tumors.
    Bartellas M; Tibbo J; Angel D; Rideout A; Gillis J
    J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Jan; 29(1):e12-e15. PubMed ID: 28968315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Technical note on introducing a digital workflow for newborns with craniofacial anomalies based on intraoral scans - part I: 3D printed and milled palatal stimulation plate for trisomy 21.
    Xepapadeas AB; Weise C; Frank K; Spintzyk S; Poets CF; Wiechers C; Arand J; Koos B
    BMC Oral Health; 2020 Jan; 20(1):20. PubMed ID: 31973720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A systematic review of the computerized tools and digital techniques applied to fabricate nasal, auricular, orbital and ocular prostheses for facial defect rehabilitation.
    Farook TH; Jamayet NB; Abdullah JY; Rajion ZA; Alam MK
    J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Jun; 121(3):268-277. PubMed ID: 31610244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An in vitro study of digital impressions and three-dimensional printed models of orbital defects using mobile devices and monoscopic photogrammetry.
    Tabira K; Kawaguchi R; Mine Y; Iwaguro S; Peng TY; Tsuchida Y; Takayama Y; Okazaki S; Taji T; Murayama T
    J Oral Sci; 2023; 65(2):127-130. PubMed ID: 36990757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validity and reliability of three-dimensional modeling of orthodontic dental casts using smartphone-based photogrammetric technology.
    Al-Rudainy D; Adel Al-Lami H; Yang L
    J World Fed Orthod; 2023 Feb; 12(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 36528481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy Evaluation of a Three-Dimensional Model Generated from Patient-Specific Monocular Video Data for Maxillofacial Prosthetic Rehabilitation: A Pilot Study.
    Matsuo M; Mine Y; Kawahara K; Murayama T
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Oct; 29(8):712-717. PubMed ID: 32583571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Monoscopic photogrammetry to obtain 3D models by a mobile device: a method for making facial prostheses.
    Salazar-Gamarra R; Seelaus R; da Silva JV; da Silva AM; Dib LL
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 May; 45(1):33. PubMed ID: 27225795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A novel digital workflow to manufacture personalized three-dimensional-printed hollow surgical obturators after maxillectomy.
    Kortes J; Dehnad H; Kotte ANT; Fennis WMM; Rosenberg AJWP
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Sep; 47(9):1214-1218. PubMed ID: 29636308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of Intraoral Digital Impressions for Whole Upper Jaws, Including Full Dentitions and Palatal Soft Tissues.
    Gan N; Xiong Y; Jiao T
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158800. PubMed ID: 27383409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Effect of Perioral Scan and Artificial Skin Markers on the Accuracy of Virtual Dentofacial Integration: Stereophotogrammetry Versus Smartphone Three-Dimensional Face-Scanning.
    Mai HN; Lee DH
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Dec; 18(1):. PubMed ID: 33396780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fabrication of obturator prosthesis by fusing CBCT and digital impression data.
    Murat S; Gürbüz A; Kamburoğlu K
    Int J Comput Dent; 2018; 21(4):335-344. PubMed ID: 30539176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Technical note on introducing a digital workflow for newborns with craniofacial anomalies based on intraoral scans - part II: 3D printed Tübingen palatal plate prototype for newborns with Robin sequence.
    Xepapadeas AB; Weise C; Frank K; Spintzyk S; Poets CF; Wiechers C; Arand J; Koos B
    BMC Oral Health; 2020 Jun; 20(1):171. PubMed ID: 32546229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.