141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33875730)
1. Usefulness of semi-automatic harmonization strategy of standardized uptake values for multicenter PET studies.
Daisaki H; Kitajima K; Nakajo M; Watabe T; Ito K; Sakamoto F; Nakahara T; Ishibashi M; Toriihara A
Sci Rep; 2021 Apr; 11(1):8517. PubMed ID: 33875730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multicentre analysis of PET SUV using vendor-neutral software: the Japanese Harmonization Technology (J-Hart) study.
Tsutsui Y; Daisaki H; Akamatsu G; Umeda T; Ogawa M; Kajiwara H; Kawase S; Sakurai M; Nishida H; Magota K; Mori K; Sasaki M;
EJNMMI Res; 2018 Aug; 8(1):83. PubMed ID: 30128776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of a digital phantom developed by QIBA for harmonizing SUVs obtained from the state-of-the-art SPECT/CT systems: a multicenter study.
Nakahara T; Daisaki H; Yamamoto Y; Iimori T; Miyagawa K; Okamoto T; Owaki Y; Yada N; Sawada K; Tokorodani R; Jinzaki M
EJNMMI Res; 2017 Dec; 7(1):53. PubMed ID: 28639254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Harmonization of standardized uptake values between two scanners, considering repeatability and magnitude of the values in clinical fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET settings: a phantom study.
Iizuka H; Daisaki H; Ogawa M; Yoshida K; Kaneta T
Nucl Med Commun; 2019 Aug; 40(8):857-864. PubMed ID: 31145204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Harmonization of PET image reconstruction parameters in simultaneous PET/MRI.
Laforest R; Khalighi M; Natsuaki Y; Rajagopal A; Chandramohan D; Byrd D; An H; Larson P; James SS; Sunderland JJ; Kinahan PE; Hope TA
EJNMMI Phys; 2021 Nov; 8(1):75. PubMed ID: 34739621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. New standards for phantom image quality and SUV harmonization range for multicenter oncology PET studies.
Akamatsu G; Shimada N; Matsumoto K; Daisaki H; Suzuki K; Watabe H; Oda K; Senda M; Terauchi T; Tateishi U
Ann Nucl Med; 2022 Feb; 36(2):144-161. PubMed ID: 35029817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Harmonization based on quantitative analysis of standardized uptake value variations across PET/CT scanners: a multicenter phantom study.
Monsef A; Ay MR; Sheikhzadeh P; Geramifar P; Rahmim A; Ghafarian P
Nucl Med Commun; 2022 Sep; 43(9):1004-1014. PubMed ID: 35836388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inter-scanner Aβ-PET harmonization using barrel phantom spatial resolution matching.
Ruwanpathirana GP; Williams RC; Masters CL; Rowe CC; Johnston LA; Davey CE
Alzheimers Dement (Amst); 2024; 16(1):e12561. PubMed ID: 38476638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multicenter quantitative
Vosoughi H; Momennezhad M; Emami F; Hajizadeh M; Rahmim A; Geramifar P
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2023 Apr; 13(4):2218-2233. PubMed ID: 37064407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of phantom-based harmonization for patient harmonization.
Panetta JV; Daube-Witherspoon ME; Karp JS
Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3534-3544. PubMed ID: 28464372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of scanner harmonization on PET-based treatment response assessment in metastatic melanoma.
Weisman AJ; Bradshaw TJ; Namias M; Jeraj R
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 65(22):225003. PubMed ID: 32906111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How to harmonize SUVs obtained by hybrid PET/CT scanners with and without point spread function correction.
Ferretti A; Chondrogiannis S; Rampin L; Bellan E; Marzola MC; Grassetto G; Gusella S; Maffione AM; Gava M; Rubello D
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Nov; 63(23):235010. PubMed ID: 30474620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of count-based image reconstruction to evaluate the variability and repeatability of measured standardised uptake values.
Kaneta T; Daisaki H; Ogawa M; Liu ET; Iizuka H; Arisawa T; Hino-Shishikura A; Yoshida K; Inoue T
PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0192549. PubMed ID: 29432459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Generating harmonized SUV within the EANM EARL accreditation program: software approach versus EARL-compliant reconstruction.
Lasnon C; Salomon T; Desmonts C; Dô P; Oulkhouir Y; Madelaine J; Aide N
Ann Nucl Med; 2017 Feb; 31(2):125-134. PubMed ID: 27812791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How Often Do We Fail to Classify the Treatment Response with [
Mattoli MV; Calcagni ML; Taralli S; Indovina L; Spottiswoode BS; Giordano A
Mol Imaging Biol; 2019 Dec; 21(6):1210-1219. PubMed ID: 30850971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. SUV Harmonization Between Different Hybrid PET/CT Systems.
Rubello D; Colletti PM
Clin Nucl Med; 2018 Nov; 43(11):811-814. PubMed ID: 30199381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of Statistical Fluctuation on Reproducibility and Accuracy of SUVmax and SUVpeak: A Phantom Study.
Akamatsu G; Ikari Y; Nishida H; Nishio T; Ohnishi A; Maebatake A; Sasaki M; Senda M
J Nucl Med Technol; 2015 Sep; 43(3):222-6. PubMed ID: 26271802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characteristics of Smoothing Filters to Achieve the Guideline Recommended Positron Emission Tomography Image without Harmonization.
Tsutsui Y; Awamoto S; Himuro K; Umezu Y; Baba S; Sasaki M
Asia Ocean J Nucl Med Biol; 2018; 6(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 29333463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimization of image reconstruction conditions with phantoms for brain FDG and amyloid PET imaging.
Akamatsu G; Ikari Y; Nishio T; Nishida H; Ohnishi A; Aita K; Sasaki M; Sasaki M; Senda M
Ann Nucl Med; 2016 Jan; 30(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 26337533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Variation and repeatability of measured standardized uptake values depending on actual values: a phantom study.
Kaneta T; Sun N; Ogawa M; Iizuka H; Arisawa T; Hino-Shishikura A; Yoshida K; Inoue T
Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017; 7(5):204-211. PubMed ID: 29181267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
