BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33875885)

  • 41. Disorder Prediction Methods, Their Applicability to Different Protein Targets and Their Usefulness for Guiding Experimental Studies.
    Atkins JD; Boateng SY; Sorensen T; McGuffin LJ
    Int J Mol Sci; 2015 Aug; 16(8):19040-54. PubMed ID: 26287166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Random, de novo, and conserved proteins: How structure and disorder predictors perform differently.
    Middendorf L; Eicholt LA
    Proteins; 2024 Jun; 92(6):757-767. PubMed ID: 38226524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. CAID prediction portal: a comprehensive service for predicting intrinsic disorder and binding regions in proteins.
    Del Conte A; Bouhraoua A; Mehdiabadi M; Clementel D; Monzon AM; ; Tosatto SCE; Piovesan D
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2023 Jul; 51(W1):W62-W69. PubMed ID: 37246642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Do sequence neighbours of intrinsically disordered regions promote structural flexibility in intrinsically disordered proteins?
    Basu S; Bahadur RP
    J Struct Biol; 2020 Feb; 209(2):107428. PubMed ID: 31756456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. CLIP: accurate prediction of disordered linear interacting peptides from protein sequences using co-evolutionary information.
    Peng Z; Li Z; Meng Q; Zhao B; Kurgan L
    Brief Bioinform; 2023 Jan; 24(1):. PubMed ID: 36458437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Resources for computational prediction of intrinsic disorder in proteins.
    Kurgan L
    Methods; 2022 Aug; 204():132-141. PubMed ID: 35367597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. An Overview of Practical Applications of Protein Disorder Prediction and Drive for Faster, More Accurate Predictions.
    Deng X; Gumm J; Karki S; Eickholt J; Cheng J
    Int J Mol Sci; 2015 Jul; 16(7):15384-404. PubMed ID: 26198229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Rapid prediction and analysis of protein intrinsic disorder.
    Dayhoff GW; Uversky VN
    Protein Sci; 2022 Dec; 31(12):e4496. PubMed ID: 36334049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The complexity of protein interactions unravelled from structural disorder.
    Seoane B; Carbone A
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 Jan; 17(1):e1008546. PubMed ID: 33417598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Accurate and Fast Prediction of Intrinsically Disordered Protein by Multiple Protein Language Models and Ensemble Learning.
    Xu S; Onoda A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2024 Apr; 64(7):2901-2911. PubMed ID: 37883249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Accurate Single-Sequence Prediction of Protein Intrinsic Disorder by an Ensemble of Deep Recurrent and Convolutional Architectures.
    Hanson J; Paliwal K; Zhou Y
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Nov; 58(11):2369-2376. PubMed ID: 30395465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Predicting Protein-Protein Interfaces that Bind Intrinsically Disordered Protein Regions.
    Wong ETC; Gsponer J
    J Mol Biol; 2019 Aug; 431(17):3157-3178. PubMed ID: 31207240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Prediction of Intrinsic Disorder with Quality Assessment Using QUARTER.
    Wu Z; Hu G; Oldfield CJ; Kurgan L
    Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2165():83-101. PubMed ID: 32621220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A critical evaluation of in silico methods for detection of membrane protein intrinsic disorder.
    Pryor EE; Wiener MC
    Biophys J; 2014 Apr; 106(8):1638-49. PubMed ID: 24739163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Where differences resemble: sequence-feature analysis in curated databases of intrinsically disordered proteins.
    Necci M; Piovesan D; Tosatto SCE
    Database (Oxford); 2018 Jan; 2018():. PubMed ID: 30576490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Sequence fingerprints distinguish erroneous from correct predictions of intrinsically disordered protein regions.
    Saravanan KM; Dunker AK; Krishnaswamy S
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2018 Dec; 36(16):4338-4351. PubMed ID: 29228892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. DisBind: A database of classified functional binding sites in disordered and structured regions of intrinsically disordered proteins.
    Yu JF; Dou XH; Sha YJ; Wang CL; Wang HB; Chen YT; Zhang F; Zhou Y; Wang JH
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Apr; 18(1):206. PubMed ID: 28381244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Quality and bias of protein disorder predictors.
    Nielsen JT; Mulder FAA
    Sci Rep; 2019 Mar; 9(1):5137. PubMed ID: 30914747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Chasing coevolutionary signals in intrinsically disordered proteins complexes.
    Iserte JA; Lazar T; Tosatto SCE; Tompa P; Marino-Buslje C
    Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):17962. PubMed ID: 33087759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The Origin of Discrepancies between Predictions and Annotations in Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.
    Pajkos M; Erdős G; Dosztányi Z
    Biomolecules; 2023 Sep; 13(10):. PubMed ID: 37892124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.