These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33876202)

  • 1. Model-Aided Design of a Rear-Impact Collision Testing System for In Vivo Investigations.
    Barrett JM; Fewster KM; Callaghan JP
    J Biomech Eng; 2021 Sep; 143(9):. PubMed ID: 33876202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do "whiplash injuries" occur in low-speed rear impacts?
    Castro WH; Schilgen M; Meyer S; Weber M; Peuker C; Wörtler K
    Eur Spine J; 1997; 6(6):366-75. PubMed ID: 9455663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of initial seated position in low speed rear-end impacts: a comparison with the TNO rear impact dummy (TRID) model.
    Venkataramana MP; Hans SA; Bawab SY; Keifer OP; Woodhouse ML; Layson PD
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2005 Mar; 6(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 15823879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Characterizing trunk muscle activations during simulated low-speed rear impact collisions.
    Fewster KM; Viggiani D; Gooyers CE; Parkinson RJ; Callaghan JP
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(3):314-319. PubMed ID: 31013170
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of Rear-End collisions on triaxial acceleration to occupant cervical and lumbar Spines: An analysis of IIHS data.
    McCleery CH; Limousis-Gayda M; Rubio E; Sie M; Hashish R
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106761. PubMed ID: 35772284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of LATCH versus Available Seatbelt Installation of Rear Facing Child Restraint Systems on Head Injury Criteria for 6 Month Old Infants in Rear End Collisions.
    Williams JR; O'Donel CA; Leiss PJ
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S16-23. PubMed ID: 26436226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is Acceleration a Valid Proxy for Injury Risk in Minimal Damage Traffic Crashes? A Comparative Review of Volunteer, ADL and Real-World Studies.
    Nolet PS; Nordhoff L; Kristman VL; Croft AC; Zeegers MP; Freeman MD
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Mar; 18(6):. PubMed ID: 33809101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A stochastic model validated with human test data causally associating target vehicle Delta V, occupant cervicocranial biomechanics, and injury during rear-impact crashes.
    Kohles SS; McClaren JW
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2022 Oct; 91():102431. PubMed ID: 36137410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Expected Crash and Injury Reduction from Production Forward Collision and Lane Departure Warning Systems.
    Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S109-14. PubMed ID: 26436219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact characteristics of a vehicle population in low speed front to rear collisions.
    Nishimura N; Simms CK; Wood DP
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Jun; 79():1-12. PubMed ID: 25795922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Internal loads in the cervical spine during motor vehicle rear-end impacts: the effect of acceleration and head-to-head restraint proximity.
    Tencer AF; Mirza S; Bensel K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Jan; 27(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 11805633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Load distribution structure of rear bumper beam to enhance vehicle body energy absorption in rear-end collisions.
    Hasegawa A; Fujii T; Matsuura N; Shimizu T
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(sup1):S75-S79. PubMed ID: 37267013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A novel method for the automated simulation of various vehicle collisions to estimate crash severity.
    Breitlauch P; Erbsmehl CT; van Ratingen M; Mallada JL; Sandner V; Ferson N; Urban M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(sup1):S116-S123. PubMed ID: 37267002
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Average male and female virtual dummy model (BioRID and EvaRID) simulations with two seat concepts in the Euro NCAP low severity rear impact test configuration.
    Linder A; Holmqvist K; Svensson MY
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 May; 114():62-70. PubMed ID: 28622848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of heterogeneity of car-following behavior on rear-end crash risk.
    Zhang J; Wang Y; Lu G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Apr; 125():275-289. PubMed ID: 30802778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modeling the influence of safety aid market penetration on traffic safety: Case of collision warning system for powered two-wheelers.
    Barbo M; Rodič B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Nov; 192():107240. PubMed ID: 37572423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reconstruction of Vehicle-pedestrian Collision Road Traffic Accidents Based on PC-Crash Software.
    Duan TL; He YW; Li Z; Yang F; Li L; Qu YQ
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Aug; 35(4):440-443. PubMed ID: 31532154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surrogate safety measure for evaluating rear-end collision risk related to kinematic waves near freeway recurrent bottlenecks.
    Li Z; Ahn S; Chung K; Ragland DR; Wang W; Yu JW
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Mar; 64():52-61. PubMed ID: 24316507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Waymo simulated driving behavior in reconstructed fatal crashes within an autonomous vehicle operating domain.
    Scanlon JM; Kusano KD; Daniel T; Alderson C; Ogle A; Victor T
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Dec; 163():106454. PubMed ID: 34700249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of collision pulse properties on seven proposed whiplash injury criteria.
    Siegmund GP; Heinrichs BE; Chimich DD; DeMarco AL; Brault JR
    Accid Anal Prev; 2005 Mar; 37(2):275-85. PubMed ID: 15667814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.