These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33876684)
1. Vascular access device securement for oncology patients and those with chronic diseases. Hawes ML Br J Nurs; 2021 Apr; 30(8):S20-S25. PubMed ID: 33876684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intravascular catheter migration: A cross-sectional and health-economic comparison of adhesive and subcutaneous engineered stabilisation devices for intravascular device securement. McParlan D; Edgar L; Gault M; Gillespie S; Menelly R; Reid M J Vasc Access; 2020 Jan; 21(1):33-38. PubMed ID: 31159638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An observational study of the securement of central venous access devices with a subcutaneous anchor device in a paediatric population at a tertiary level hospital. Fitzsimons KM; Speekman J; Senior T; Curtis K; Cochrane-Davis A; Barnes R J Vasc Access; 2020 Nov; 21(6):959-962. PubMed ID: 32370686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Central venous Access device SeCurement And Dressing Effectiveness for peripherally inserted central catheters in adult acute hospital patients (CASCADE): a pilot randomised controlled trial. Chan RJ; Northfield S; Larsen E; Mihala G; Ullman A; Hancock P; Marsh N; Gavin N; Wyld D; Allworth A; Russell E; Choudhury MA; Flynn J; Rickard CM Trials; 2017 Oct; 18(1):458. PubMed ID: 28978332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An innovative cyanoacrylate device developed to improve the current standard of care for intravascular catheter securement. Guido A; Zhang S; Yang C; Pook L J Vasc Access; 2020 May; 21(3):293-299. PubMed ID: 31495268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cyanoacrylate Securement in Neonatal PICC Use: A 4-Year Observational Study. van Rens M; Nimeri AMA; Spencer TR; Hugill K; Francia ALV; Olukade TO; Mahmah MA Adv Neonatal Care; 2022 Jun; 22(3):270-279. PubMed ID: 34743117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Catheter securement impact on PICC-related CLABSI: A university hospital perspective. Rowe MS; Arnold K; Spencer TR Am J Infect Control; 2020 Dec; 48(12):1497-1500. PubMed ID: 32562714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. GAVeCeLT-WoCoVA Consensus on subcutaneously anchored securement devices for the securement of venous catheters: Current evidence and recommendations for future research. Pinelli F; Pittiruti M; Van Boxtel T; Barone G; Biffi R; Capozzoli G; Crocoli A; Elli S; Elisei D; Fabiani A; Garrino C; Graziano U; Montagnani L; Prato AP; Scoppettuolo G; Zadra N; Zanaboni C; Zerla P; Konstantinou E; Jones M; Rosay H; Simcock L; Stas M; Pepe G J Vasc Access; 2021 Sep; 22(5):716-725. PubMed ID: 32613887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Revolutionary, Proven Solution to Vascular Access Concerns: A Review of the Advantageous Properties and Benefits of Catheter Securement Cyanoacrylate Adhesives. Zhang S; Lingle BS; Phelps S J Infus Nurs; 2022 May-Jun 01; 45(3):154-164. PubMed ID: 35537003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Catheter Securement Systems for Peripherally Inserted and Nontunneled Central Vascular Access Devices: Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Sutureless Device. Krenik KM; Smith GE; Bernatchez SF J Infus Nurs; 2016; 39(4):210-7. PubMed ID: 27379679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Innovation in Central Venous Access Device Security: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial in Pediatric Critical Care. Ullman AJ; Long D; Williams T; Pearson K; Mihala G; Mattke AC; Macfarlane F; Rickard CM Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2019 Oct; 20(10):e480-e488. PubMed ID: 31274778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical evaluation of a securement device used on midline catheters. Ventura R; O'Loughlin C; Vavrik B Br J Nurs; 2016 Jul; 25(14):S16-22. PubMed ID: 27467651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Central venous Access device SeCurement And Dressing Effectiveness (CASCADE) in paediatrics: protocol for pilot randomised controlled trials. Ullman AJ; Kleidon T; Gibson V; Long DA; Williams T; McBride CA; Hallahan A; Mihala G; Cooke M; Rickard CM BMJ Open; 2016 Jun; 6(6):e011197. PubMed ID: 27259529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Alternative exit sites for central venous access: Back tunneling to the scapular region and distal tunneling to the patellar region. Ostroff MD; Pittiruti M J Vasc Access; 2021 Nov; 22(6):992-996. PubMed ID: 32644003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical experience of a subcutaneously anchored sutureless system for securing central venous catheters. Pittiruti M; Scoppettuolo G; Dolcetti L; Celentano D; Emoli A; Marche B; Musarò A Br J Nurs; 2019 Jan; 28(2):S4-S14. PubMed ID: 30673323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ten years of clinical experience with cyanoacrylate glue for venous access in a 1300-bed university hospital. Pittiruti M; Annetta MG; Marche B; D'Andrea V; Scoppettuolo G Br J Nurs; 2022 Apr; 31(8):S4-S13. PubMed ID: 35439068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Why are we stuck on tape and suture? A review of catheter securement devices. Frey AM; Schears GJ J Infus Nurs; 2006; 29(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 16428999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tissue adhesive for vascular access devices: who, what, where and when? Corley A; Marsh N; Ullman AJ; Rickard CM Br J Nurs; 2017 Oct; 26(19):S4-S17. PubMed ID: 29068728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A retrospective study of subcutaneous anchor securement systems in oncology patients. Hawes ML; McCormick CA; Gilbert GE J Vasc Access; 2023 Aug; ():11297298231190416. PubMed ID: 37528691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]