These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33876780)
21. Polymerase chain reaction blood tests for the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis in immunocompromised people. Cruciani M; Mengoli C; Loeffler J; Donnelly P; Barnes R; Jones BL; Klingspor L; Morton O; Maertens J Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Sep; (9):CD009551. PubMed ID: 26343815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Polymerase chain reaction blood tests for the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis in immunocompromised people. Cruciani M; Mengoli C; Loeffler J; Donnelly P; Barnes R; Jones BL; Klingspor L; Morton O; Maertens J Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Oct; (10):CD009551. PubMed ID: 26424726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Mimics and chameleons of COVID-19: patient presentation and accuracy of triage during the first wave. Jauslin AS; Simon NR; Giudici NL; Rueegg M; Zimmermann T; Diebold M; Tschudin-Sutter S; Twerenbold R; Nickel CH; Bingisser R Swiss Med Wkly; 2021 Dec; 151():w30103. PubMed ID: 34874013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Bias in estimating accuracy of a binary screening test with differential disease verification. Alonzo TA; Brinton JT; Ringham BM; Glueck DH Stat Med; 2011 Jul; 30(15):1852-64. PubMed ID: 21495059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Accounting for nonignorable verification bias in assessment of diagnostic tests. Kosinski AS; Barnhart HX Biometrics; 2003 Mar; 59(1):163-71. PubMed ID: 12762453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy. Leeflang MM Clin Microbiol Infect; 2014 Feb; 20(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 24274632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A methodological review of how heterogeneity has been examined in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy. Dinnes J; Deeks J; Kirby J; Roderick P Health Technol Assess; 2005 Mar; 9(12):1-113, iii. PubMed ID: 15774235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Capsule endoscopy for the diagnosis of oesophageal varices in people with chronic liver disease or portal vein thrombosis. Colli A; Gana JC; Turner D; Yap J; Adams-Webber T; Ling SC; Casazza G Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Oct; 2014(10):CD008760. PubMed ID: 25271409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Faecal immunochemical tests to triage patients with lower abdominal symptoms for suspected colorectal cancer referrals in primary care: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis. Westwood M; Corro Ramos I; Lang S; Luyendijk M; Zaim R; Stirk L; Al M; Armstrong N; Kleijnen J Health Technol Assess; 2017 May; 21(33):1-234. PubMed ID: 28643629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Adjusting for differential-verification bias in diagnostic-accuracy studies: a Bayesian approach. de Groot JA; Dendukuri N; Janssen KJ; Reitsma JB; Bossuyt PM; Moons KG Epidemiology; 2011 Mar; 22(2):234-41. PubMed ID: 21228702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The effectiveness of diagnostic tests for the assessment of shoulder pain due to soft tissue disorders: a systematic review. Dinnes J; Loveman E; McIntyre L; Waugh N Health Technol Assess; 2003; 7(29):iii, 1-166. PubMed ID: 14567906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Dopamine transporter imaging for the diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies. McCleery J; Morgan S; Bradley KM; Noel-Storr AH; Ansorge O; Hyde C Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Jan; 1(1):CD010633. PubMed ID: 25632881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Forcing dichotomous disease classification from reference standards leads to bias in diagnostic accuracy estimates: A simulation study. Jenniskens K; Naaktgeboren CA; Reitsma JB; Hooft L; Moons KGM; van Smeden M J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Jul; 111():1-10. PubMed ID: 30904568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Shock index and modified shock index as triage screening tools for sepsis. Althunayyan SM; Alsofayan YM; Khan AA J Infect Public Health; 2019; 12(6):822-826. PubMed ID: 31113741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. An algorithm for the classification of study designs to assess diagnostic, prognostic and predictive test accuracy in systematic reviews. Mathes T; Pieper D Syst Rev; 2019 Sep; 8(1):226. PubMed ID: 31481098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Biases in diagnostic test studies: impact on estimating sensitivity and specificity]. Rendón-Macías ME; Valenzuela M; Villasís-Keever MÁ Rev Alerg Mex; 2020; 67(2):165-173. PubMed ID: 32892530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Diagnostic accuracy of the Triage D-dimer test for exclusion of venous thromboembolism in outpatients. Ghys T; Achtergael W; Verschraegen I; Leus B; Jochmans K Thromb Res; 2008; 121(6):735-41. PubMed ID: 17888501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Estimates of sensitivity and specificity can be biased when reporting the results of the second test in a screening trial conducted in series. Ringham BM; Alonzo TA; Grunwald GK; Glueck DH BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Jan; 10():3. PubMed ID: 20064254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Recognising bias in studies of diagnostic tests part 2: interpreting and verifying the index test. Kea B; Hall MK; Wang R Emerg Med J; 2019 Aug; 36(8):501-505. PubMed ID: 31221671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A new method to address verification bias in studies of clinical screening tests: cervical cancer screening assays as an example. Xue X; Kim MY; Castle PE; Strickler HD J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Mar; 67(3):343-53. PubMed ID: 24332397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]