BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33877047)

  • 1. Potential Candidates for Focal Therapy in Prostate Cancer in the Era of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy: A Large Multicenter Cohort Study.
    von Hardenberg J; Borkowetz A; Siegel F; Kornienko K; Westhoff N; Jordan TB; Hoffmann M; Drerup M; Lieb V; Taymoorian K; Schostak M; Ganzer R; Höfner T; Cash H; Bruendl J;
    Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Sep; 7(5):1002-1010. PubMed ID: 33877047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Novel Nomogram to Identify Candidates for Focal Therapy Among Patients with Localized Prostate Cancer Diagnosed via Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted and Systematic Biopsies: A European Multicenter Study.
    Mjaess G; Peltier A; Roche JB; Lievore E; Lacetera V; Chiacchio G; Beatrici V; Mastroianni R; Simone G; Windisch O; Benamran D; Fourcade A; Nguyen TA; Fournier G; Fiard G; Ploussard G; Roumeguère T; Albisinni S; Diamand R
    Eur Urol Focus; 2023 Nov; 9(6):992-999. PubMed ID: 37147167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combination of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and transperineal template-guided mapping prostate biopsy to determine potential candidates for focal therapy.
    Choi YH; Lee CU; Song W; Chang Jeong B; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Lee HM; Jeon HG; Lee SJ
    Prostate Int; 2023 Jun; 11(2):100-106. PubMed ID: 37409092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A novel nomogram to identify candidates for active surveillance amongst patients with International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade Group (GG) 1 or ISUP GG2 prostate cancer, according to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging findings.
    Luzzago S; de Cobelli O; Cozzi G; Peveri G; Bagnardi V; Catellani M; Di Trapani E; Mistretta FA; Pricolo P; Conti A; Alessi S; Marvaso G; Ferro M; Matei DV; Renne G; Jereczek-Fossa BA; Petralia G; Musi G
    BJU Int; 2020 Jul; 126(1):104-113. PubMed ID: 32150328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characteristics of Cancer Progression on Serial Biopsy in Men on Active Surveillance for Early-stage Prostate Cancer: Implications for Focal Therapy.
    Fasulo V; Cowan JE; Maggi M; Washington SL; Nguyen HG; Shinohara K; Lazzeri M; Casale P; Carroll PR
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Feb; 5(1):61-69. PubMed ID: 33069628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prevalence of Prostate Cancer in PI-RADS Version 2.1 Transition Zone Atypical Nodules Upgraded by Abnormal DWI: Correlation With MRI-Directed TRUS-Guided Targeted Biopsy.
    Lim CS; Abreu-Gomez J; Carrion I; Schieda N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Mar; 216(3):683-690. PubMed ID: 32755208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multifocality of Prostate Cancer and Candidacy for Focal Therapy Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Okabe Y; Patel HD; Rac G; Gupta GN
    Urology; 2022 Nov; 169():141-149. PubMed ID: 35914584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prospective PI-RADS v2.1 Atypical Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Nodules With Marked Restricted Diffusion: Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on Multiparametric MRI.
    Costa DN; Jia L; Subramanian N; Xi Y; Rofsky NM; Recchimuzzi DZ; de Leon AD; Arraj P; Pedrosa I
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Aug; 217(2):395-403. PubMed ID: 32876473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnostic Accuracy of Single-plane Biparametric and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial in Biopsy-naïve Men.
    Russo F; Mazzetti S; Regge D; Ambrosini I; Giannini V; Manfredi M; De Luca S; Bollito E; Porpiglia F
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Dec; 4(6):855-862. PubMed ID: 33893066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Focal therapy: patients, interventions, and outcomes--a report from a consensus meeting.
    Donaldson IA; Alonzi R; Barratt D; Barret E; Berge V; Bott S; Bottomley D; Eggener S; Ehdaie B; Emberton M; Hindley R; Leslie T; Miners A; McCartan N; Moore CM; Pinto P; Polascik TJ; Simmons L; van der Meulen J; Villers A; Willis S; Ahmed HU
    Eur Urol; 2015 Apr; 67(4):771-7. PubMed ID: 25281389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do contemporary imaging and biopsy techniques reliably identify unilateral prostate cancer? Implications for hemiablation patient selection.
    Johnson DC; Yang JJ; Kwan L; Barsa DE; Mirak SA; Pooli A; Sadun T; Jayadevan R; Zhou S; Priester AM; Natarajan S; Bajgiran AM; Shakeri S; Sisk A; Felker ER; Raman SS; Marks LS; Reiter RE
    Cancer; 2019 Sep; 125(17):2955-2964. PubMed ID: 31042322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Additive Diagnostic Value of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography to Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Triage in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer (PRIMARY): A Prospective Multicentre Study.
    Emmett L; Buteau J; Papa N; Moon D; Thompson J; Roberts MJ; Rasiah K; Pattison DA; Yaxley J; Thomas P; Hutton AC; Agrawal S; Amin A; Blazevski A; Chalasani V; Ho B; Nguyen A; Liu V; Lee J; Sheehan-Dare G; Kooner R; Coughlin G; Chan L; Cusick T; Namdarian B; Kapoor J; Alghazo O; Woo HH; Lawrentschuk N; Murphy D; Hofman MS; Stricker P
    Eur Urol; 2021 Dec; 80(6):682-689. PubMed ID: 34465492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prediction of High-grade Prostate Cancer Following Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators.
    Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Verbeek JFM; Schoots IG; Chiu PK; Osses DF; Tijsterman JD; Beerlage HP; Mannaerts CK; Schimmöller L; Albers P; Arsov C
    Eur Urol; 2019 Feb; 75(2):310-318. PubMed ID: 30082150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Triggers and oncologic outcome of salvage radical prostatectomy, salvage radiotherapy and active surveillance after focal therapy of prostate cancer.
    von Hardenberg J; Cash H; Koch D; Borkowetz A; Bruendl J; Leyh-Bannurah SR; Kuru TH; Kowalewski KF; Schindele D; Mala KS; Westhoff N; Blana A; Schostak M;
    World J Urol; 2021 Oct; 39(10):3747-3754. PubMed ID: 33881557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic yields in patients with suspected prostate cancer undergoing MRI as the first-line investigation in routine practice.
    Sokhi HK; Padhani AR; Patel S; Pope A
    Clin Radiol; 2020 Dec; 75(12):950-956. PubMed ID: 32919755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Combination of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies is not enough for identifying patients eligible for hemiablative focal therapy for prostate cancer.
    Choi YH; Yu JW; Kang MY; Sung HH; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Lee HM; Jeon HG
    World J Urol; 2019 Oct; 37(10):2129-2135. PubMed ID: 30603783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Medium-term Oncological Efficacy and Patient-reported Outcomes After Focal High-intensity Focused Ultrasound: The FOXPRO Trial.
    Westhoff N; Ernst R; Kowalewski KF; Derigs F; Neuberger M; Nörenberg D; Popovic ZV; Ritter M; Stephan Michel M; von Hardenberg J
    Eur Urol Focus; 2023 Mar; 9(2):283-290. PubMed ID: 36344395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The "Is mpMRI Enough" or IMRIE Study: A Multicentre Evaluation of Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compared with Biopsy.
    Stonier T; Simson N; Shah T; Lobo N; Amer T; Lee SM; Bass E; Chau E; Grey A; McCartan N; Acher P; Ahmad I; Arumainayagam N; Brown D; Chapman A; Elf D; Hartington T; Ibrahim I; Leung H; Liyanage S; Lovegrove C; Malthouse T; Mateen B; Mistry K; Morrison I; Nalagatla S; Persad R; Pope A; Sokhi H; Syed H; Tadtayev S; Tharmaratnam M; Qteishat A; Miah S; Emberton M; Moore C; Walton T; Eddy B; Ahmed HU
    Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Sep; 7(5):1027-1034. PubMed ID: 33046412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Combined Use of Prostate-specific Antigen Density and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Biopsy Decision Planning: A Retrospective Multi-institutional Study Using the Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Outcome Database (PROMOD).
    Falagario UG; Jambor I; Lantz A; Ettala O; Stabile A; Taimen P; Aronen HJ; Knaapila J; Perez IM; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Martini A; Cucchiara V; Picker W; Haug E; Ratnani P; Haines K; Lewis S; Sujit N; Selvaggio O; Sanguedolce F; Macarini L; Cormio L; Nordström T; Tewari A; Briganti A; Boström PJ; Carrieri G
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Dec; 4(6):971-979. PubMed ID: 32972896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance of Combined Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-guided and Systematic Biopsy of the Prostate in Biopsy-naïve Patients and Patients with Prior Biopsies.
    Preisser F; Theissen L; Wenzel M; Humke C; Bodelle B; Köllermann J; Kluth L; Banek S; Becker A; Roos F; Chun FK; Mandel P
    Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Jan; 7(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 31296485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.