These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33877407)
1. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: all-poly versus metal-backed tibial component-a long-term follow-up study. Sessa V; Celentano U Int Orthop; 2021 Dec; 45(12):3063-3068. PubMed ID: 33877407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Metal-backed or all-poly tibial components: which are better for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? A propensity-score-matching retrospective study at the 5-year follow-up. Piovan G; De Berardinis L; Screpis D; Senarighi M; Povegliano L; Natali S; Gigante AP; Zorzi C J Orthop Traumatol; 2024 May; 25(1):24. PubMed ID: 38704499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mid-term outcomes of medial metal backed and all-polyethylene unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in obese patients: a retrospective propensity-matched analysis. De Berardinis L; Piovan G; Screpis D; Senarighi M; Baldini M; Povegliano L; Gigante AP; Zorzi C J Orthop Surg Res; 2024 Oct; 19(1):651. PubMed ID: 39402592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. All-Polyethylene Tibial Component in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Offers Excellent Survivorship and Clinical Outcomes at Short-Term Follow-Up: A Multicenter Retrospective Clinical Study. Bonanzinga T; Adravanti FM; Vitale U; Anzillotti G; Iacono F; Marcacci M Medicina (Kaunas); 2024 Sep; 60(9):. PubMed ID: 39336492 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasties: does the type of tibial component selected influence implant survival? Montilla FJ; Payo-Ollero J; Serrano-Toledano D; Del Río-Arteaga M; Ribera J; Muela R Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2024 Jan; 144(1):347-355. PubMed ID: 37743356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Revision of Unicompartmental to Total Knee Arthroplasty: Does the Unicompartmental Implant (Metal-Backed vs All-Polyethylene) Impact the Total Knee Arthroplasty? Scott CEH; Powell-Bowns MFR; MacDonald DJ; Simpson PM; Wade FA J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jul; 33(7):2203-2209. PubMed ID: 29525342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Metal or Modularity: Why Do Metal-Backed Tibias Have Inferior Outcomes to All-Polyethylene Tibial Components in Patients With Osteoarthritis. Houdek MT; Watts CD; Wyles CC; Martin JR; Trousdale RT; Taunton MJ J Arthroplasty; 2017 Mar; 32(3):836-842. PubMed ID: 27816367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. No difference in functional outcomes, quality of life and survivorship between metal-backed and all-polyethylene tibial components in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a 10-year follow-up study. Lee M; Cheng D; Chen J; Liow L; Lo NN; Yeo SJ Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2021 Oct; 29(10):3368-3374. PubMed ID: 32816104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Good survivorship of all-polyethylene tibial component UKA at long-term follow-up. Bruni D; Gagliardi M; Akkawi I; Raspugli GF; Bignozzi S; Marko T; Bragonzoni L; Grassi A; Marcacci M Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Jan; 24(1):182-7. PubMed ID: 25297704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. All-polyethylene versus metal-backed tibial component in total knee arthroplasty. Longo UG; Ciuffreda M; D'Andrea V; Mannering N; Locher J; Denaro V Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2017 Nov; 25(11):3620-3636. PubMed ID: 27209191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. All-polyethylene vs. metal-backed tibial component in total knee arthroplasty-a randomized RSA study comparing early fixation of horizontally and completely cemented tibial components: part 2. Completely cemented components: MB not superior to AP components. Hyldahl H; Regnér L; Carlsson L; Kärrholm J; Weidenhielm L Acta Orthop; 2005 Dec; 76(6):778-84. PubMed ID: 16470429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of implant position and joint awareness between fixed- and mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a minimum of five year follow-up study. Kim MS; Koh IJ; Kim CK; Choi KY; Baek JW; In Y Int Orthop; 2020 Nov; 44(11):2329-2336. PubMed ID: 32577875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bearing thickness of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is a reliable predictor of tibial bone loss during revision to total knee arthroplasty. Lo Presti M; Costa GG; Grassi A; Agrò G; Cialdella S; Vasco C; Neri MP; Cucurnia I; Zaffagnini S Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2020 May; 106(3):429-434. PubMed ID: 32253136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimum thickness of all-poly tibial component unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients younger than 60 years does not increase revision rate for aseptic loosening. Bruni D; Akkawi I; Iacono F; Raspugli GF; Gagliardi M; Nitri M; Grassi A; Zaffagnini S; Bignozzi S; Marcacci M Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2013 Nov; 21(11):2462-7. PubMed ID: 23812439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. All-polyethylene tibial components in young patients have stable fixation; a comparison RSA study. Campbell D; Callary S; Field J; Nilsson KG Knee; 2019 Mar; 26(2):392-399. PubMed ID: 30638681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Navigated versus conventional medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Minimum 18 years clinical outcomes and survivorship of the original Cartier design. Andriollo L; Montagna A; Mazzella GG; Sangaletti R; Benazzo F; Rossi SMP Knee; 2024 Aug; 49():183-191. PubMed ID: 39043013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A flat all-polyethylene tibial component in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a long-term study. Manzotti A; Cerveri P; Pullen C; Confalonieri N Knee; 2014; 21 Suppl 1():S20-5. PubMed ID: 25382363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. All-polyethylene unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is associated with increased risks of poorer knee society knee score and lower satisfaction in obese patients. Foo WYX; Liow MHL; Chen JY; Tay DKJ; Lo NN; Yeo SJ Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2022 Dec; 142(12):3977-3985. PubMed ID: 35094135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Do bone loss and reconstruction procedures differ at revision of cemented unicompartmental knee prostheses according to the use of metal-back or all-polyethylene tibial component? Rouanet T; Combes A; Migaud H; Pasquier G Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2013 Oct; 99(6):687-92. PubMed ID: 23810395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. All-polyethylene vs. metal-backed tibial component in total knee arthroplasty-a randomized RSA study comparing early fixation of horizontally and completely cemented tibial components: part 1. Horizontally cemented components: AP better fixated than MB. Hyldahl H; Regnér L; Carlsson L; Kärrholm J; Weidenhielm L Acta Orthop; 2005 Dec; 76(6):769-77. PubMed ID: 16470428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]