These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33878065)

  • 1. The Effects of a Senofilcon A Contact Lens With and Without a Photochromic Additive on Positive Dysphotopsia Across Age.
    Hammond BR; Buch J; Sonoda L; Renzi-Hammond L
    Eye Contact Lens; 2021 May; 47(5):265-270. PubMed ID: 33878065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of light scatter when using a photochromic vs. non-photochromic contact lens.
    Hammond BR; Buch J; Hacker L; Cannon J; Toubouti Y; Renzi-Hammond LM
    J Optom; 2020; 13(4):227-234. PubMed ID: 32331922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Influence of HEV-Filtering Contact Lenses on Behavioral Indices of Glare.
    Renzi-Hammond LM; Buch J; Xu J; Hammond BR
    Eye Contact Lens; 2022 Dec; 48(12):509-515. PubMed ID: 36201639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Effect of a Photochromic Contact Lens on Visual Function Indoors: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.
    Renzi-Hammond LM; Buch JR; Hacker L; Cannon J; Hammond BR
    Optom Vis Sci; 2020 Jul; 97(7):526-530. PubMed ID: 32697560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Randomized Crossover Trial Evaluating the Impact of Senofilcon A Photochromic Lens on Driving Performance.
    Buch JR; Toubouti Y; Cannon J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2020 Jan; 97(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 31895273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A contra-lateral comparison of the visual effects of a photochromic vs. non-photochromic contact lens.
    Renzi-Hammond L; Buch JR; Cannon J; Hacker L; Toubouti Y; Hammond BR
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2020 Jun; 43(3):250-255. PubMed ID: 31734088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lens fitting and subjective acceptance of senofilcon A with photochromic additive on a neophyte population.
    Buch JR; Sonoda L; Cannon JL
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2021 Aug; 44(4):101369. PubMed ID: 33067116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of senofilcon A contact lenses compared to habitual contact lenses on ocular discomfort during exposure to a controlled adverse environment.
    Ousler GW; Anderson RT; Osborn KE
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2008 Feb; 24(2):335-41. PubMed ID: 18073007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Effects of Blue-Light Filtering Intraocular Implants on Glare Geometry.
    Hammond BR; Gardner CR; Renzi-Hammond L
    Curr Eye Res; 2023 Jul; 48(7):639-644. PubMed ID: 37074213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sunglasses- and photochromic lens-wearing patterns in spectacle and/or contact lens-wearing individuals.
    Glavas IP; Patel S; Donsoff I; Stenson S
    Eye Contact Lens; 2004 Apr; 30(2):81-4. PubMed ID: 15260353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Unexpected vision performance with photochromic contact lenses in normal and low light conditions: An analysis of two randomized trials.
    Buch J; Sonoda L; Cannon J
    J Optom; 2023; 16(2):135-142. PubMed ID: 35953430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recent developments in pseudophakic dysphotopsia.
    Schwiegerling J
    Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2006 Feb; 17(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 16436921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Class I UV-blocking (senofilcon A) soft contact lens prevents UVA-induced yellow fluorescence and NADH loss in the rabbit lens nucleus in vivo.
    Giblin FJ; Lin LR; Simpanya MF; Leverenz VR; Fick CE
    Exp Eye Res; 2012 Sep; 102():17-27. PubMed ID: 22766154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prevention of UV-induced damage to the anterior segment using class I UV-absorbing hydrogel contact lenses.
    Chandler HL; Reuter KS; Sinnott LT; Nichols JJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Jan; 51(1):172-8. PubMed ID: 19710408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Impact of Cosmetics on the Physical Dimension and Optical Performance of Contemporary Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses.
    Luensmann D; van Doorn K; May C; Srinivasan S; Jones L
    Eye Contact Lens; 2020 May; 46(3):166-173. PubMed ID: 31232789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of photochromic lenses on visual performance.
    Renzi-Hammond LM; Hammond BR
    Clin Exp Optom; 2016 Nov; 99(6):568-574. PubMed ID: 27346784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical investigation of asmofilcon a silicone hydrogel lenses.
    Lakkis C; Vincent S
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Apr; 86(4):350-6. PubMed ID: 19258913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative evaluation of Comfilcon A and Senofilcon A bandage contact lenses after transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy.
    Mukherjee A; Ioannides A; Aslanides I
    J Optom; 2015; 8(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 25649638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Determining the spectral transmittance of photochromic contact lenses.
    Alabi EB; Simpson TL; Harris T; Whitten K
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2021 Oct; 44(5):101406. PubMed ID: 33461876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of daily disposable senofilcon A contact lenses in a symptomatic population.
    Bishop MJ; Sun CK; Coles-Brennan C; Gallois-Bernos A
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2022 Oct; 45(5):101574. PubMed ID: 35101386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.