159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33878467)
1. Single-Position Surgery versus Lateral-Then-Prone-Position Circumferential Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Literature Review.
Guiroy A; Carazzo C; Camino-Willhuber G; Gagliardi M; Fernandes-Joaquim A; Cabrera JP; Menezes C; Asghar J
World Neurosurg; 2021 Jul; 151():e379-e386. PubMed ID: 33878467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perioperative and Radiographic Outcomes Between Single-Position Surgery (Lateral Decubitus) and Dual-Position Surgery for Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation: Meta-Analysis.
Keorochana G; Muljadi JA; Kongtharvonskul J
World Neurosurg; 2022 Sep; 165():e282-e291. PubMed ID: 35710097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Single position lumbar fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Mills ES; Treloar J; Idowu O; Shelby T; Alluri RK; Hah RJ
Spine J; 2022 Mar; 22(3):429-443. PubMed ID: 34699998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Single position circumferential fusion improves operative efficiency, reduces complications and length of stay compared with traditional circumferential fusion.
Buckland AJ; Ashayeri K; Leon C; Manning J; Eisen L; Medley M; Protopsaltis TS; Thomas JA
Spine J; 2021 May; 21(5):810-820. PubMed ID: 33197616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of radiological changes after single- position versus dual- position for lateral interbody fusion and pedicle screw fixation.
Hiyama A; Katoh H; Sakai D; Sato M; Tanaka M; Watanabe M
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Dec; 20(1):601. PubMed ID: 31830959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of complication rates of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review of the literature.
Joseph JR; Smith BW; La Marca F; Park P
Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Oct; 39(4):E4. PubMed ID: 26424344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technical Aspects, Operative Outcomes, and Complications.
Li JX; Phan K; Mobbs R
World Neurosurg; 2017 Feb; 98():113-123. PubMed ID: 27777161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differences in radiographic and clinical outcomes of oblique lateral interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disease: a meta-analysis.
Li HM; Zhang RJ; Shen CL
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Dec; 20(1):582. PubMed ID: 31801508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A systematic review of clinical outcomes in surgical treatment of adult isthmic spondylolisthesis.
Noorian S; Sorensen K; Cho W
Spine J; 2018 Aug; 18(8):1441-1454. PubMed ID: 29746966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rate of failure of indirect decompression in lateral single-position surgery: clinical results.
Thomas JA; Thomason CIM; Braly BA; Menezes CM
Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E5. PubMed ID: 32871563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The analysis of percutaneous pedicle screw technique with guide wire-less in lateral decubitus position following extreme lateral interbody fusion.
Hiyama A; Sakai D; Sato M; Watanabe M
J Orthop Surg Res; 2019 Sep; 14(1):304. PubMed ID: 31488181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Single-position prone lateral approach: cadaveric feasibility study and early clinical experience.
Godzik J; Ohiorhenuan IE; Xu DS; de Andrada Pereira B; Walker CT; Whiting AC; Turner JD; Uribe JS
Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E15. PubMed ID: 32871564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion in the elderly: a 10-year experience.
Agarwal N; Faramand A; Alan N; Tempel ZJ; Hamilton DK; Okonkwo DO; Kanter AS
J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Nov; 29(5):525-529. PubMed ID: 30052150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Single-position circumferential lumbar spinal fusion: an overview of terminology, concepts, rationale and the current evidence base.
Thomas JA; Menezes C; Buckland AJ; Khajavi K; Ashayeri K; Braly BA; Kwon B; Cheng I; Berjano P
Eur Spine J; 2022 Sep; 31(9):2167-2174. PubMed ID: 35913621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Stand-alone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Open Laminectomy and Posterolateral Instrumented Fusion in the Treatment of Adjacent Segment Disease Following Previous Lumbar Fusion Surgery.
Louie PK; Haws BE; Khan JM; Markowitz J; Movassaghi K; Ferguson J; Lopez GD; An HS; Phillips FM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Dec; 44(24):E1461-E1469. PubMed ID: 31415471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Single position versus lateral-then-prone positioning for lateral interbody fusion and pedicle screw fixation.
Ziino C; Konopka JA; Ajiboye RM; Ledesma JB; Koltsov JCB; Cheng I
J Spine Surg; 2018 Dec; 4(4):717-724. PubMed ID: 30714003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar fusion: meta-analysis and systematic review.
Goldstein CL; Macwan K; Sundararajan K; Rampersaud YR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Mar; 24(3):416-27. PubMed ID: 26565767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Single-Position Prone Lateral Interbody Fusion Improves Segmental Lordosis in Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.
Walker CT; Farber SH; Gandhi S; Godzik J; Turner JD; Uribe JS
World Neurosurg; 2021 Jul; 151():e786-e792. PubMed ID: 33964495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is the use of minimally invasive fusion technologies associated with improved outcomes after elective interbody lumbar fusion? Analysis of a nationwide prospective patient-reported outcomes registry.
McGirt MJ; Parker SL; Mummaneni P; Knightly J; Pfortmiller D; Foley K; Asher AL
Spine J; 2017 Jul; 17(7):922-932. PubMed ID: 28254672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Correction of severe spinopelvic mismatch: decreased blood loss with lateral hyperlordotic interbody grafts as compared with pedicle subtraction osteotomy.
Leveque JC; Yanamadala V; Buchlak QD; Sethi RK
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E15. PubMed ID: 28760028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
