These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

445 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33878836)

  • 21. [Comparison of initial results with robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy].
    Otsuki H; Kuwahara Y; Nakamura K; Tsukamoto T
    Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi; 2013 Sep; 104(5):635-43. PubMed ID: 24187850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Retzius Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Conveys Early Regain of Continence over Conventional Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of 1,863 Patients.
    Lee J; Kim HY; Goh HJ; Heo JE; Almujalhem A; Alqahtani AA; Chung DY; Chang K; Choi YD; Rha KH
    J Urol; 2020 Jan; 203(1):137-144. PubMed ID: 31347951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy helps improve postoperative urinary continence recovery in patients with prostate cancer].
    Xue MP; Wang CY; Hu WT; Zhao JX; Chen M
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2022 Jun; 28(6):501-505. PubMed ID: 37477466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of Retzius-sparing versus standard robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
    Tahra A; Sen UT; Sobay R; İnkaya A; Kucuk EV; Boylu U
    Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2022 Jun; 46(5):293-300. PubMed ID: 35221232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Retzius-Sparing
    Turkolmez K; Akpinar C; Kubilay E; Suer E
    J Endourol; 2022 Sep; 36(9):1214-1222. PubMed ID: 35546454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Postoperative functional and cancer control evaluation of conventional and Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Comparison of selected cases by propensity score matching.
    Kadono Y; Nohara T; Kawaguchi S; Kadomoto S; Iwamoto H; Yaegashi H; Iijima M; Shigehara K; Izumi K; Mizokami A
    Prostate; 2023 Jun; 83(8):773-780. PubMed ID: 36879364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Single-Port Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Feasibility and Early Outcomes.
    Bassett JC; Salibian S; Crivellaro S
    J Endourol; 2022 May; 36(5):620-625. PubMed ID: 34931527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of Early Urinary Continence, Oncological Outcomes, and Postoperative Complications in Retzius-Sparing and Standard Approach Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
    Yılmaz K; Ölçücü MT; Özsoy Ç; Aksaray EE; Kılıç Ş; Ateş M
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2023 Feb; 33(2):150-154. PubMed ID: 36257651
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Functional Recovery, Oncologic Outcomes and Postoperative Complications after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: An Evidence-Based Analysis Comparing the Retzius Sparing and Standard Approaches.
    Menon M; Dalela D; Jamil M; Diaz M; Tallman C; Abdollah F; Sood A; Lehtola L; Miller D; Jeong W
    J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1210-1217. PubMed ID: 29225060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Influence of modified posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter on early recovery of continence and anastomotic leakage rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Coelho RF; Chauhan S; Orvieto MA; Sivaraman A; Palmer KJ; Coughlin G; Patel VR
    Eur Urol; 2011 Jan; 59(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 20801579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Improved urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with lateral pelvic fascia preservation.
    Shiota M; Tsukahara S; Ueda S; Mutaguchi J; Goto S; Kobayashi S; Matsumoto T; Blas L; Monji K; Inokuchi J; Eto M
    J Robot Surg; 2023 Dec; 17(6):2721-2728. PubMed ID: 37634216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy vs the standard approach: a systematic review and analysis of comparative outcomes.
    Checcucci E; Veccia A; Fiori C; Amparore D; Manfredi M; Di Dio M; Morra I; Galfano A; Autorino R; Bocciardi AM; Dasgupta P; Porpiglia F
    BJU Int; 2020 Jan; 125(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 31373142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Transition from standard robotic prostatectomy to Retzius-sparing prostatectomy: feasibility and early outcomes.
    Elliott N; Pahouja G; Felice M; Capoccia E; Patel PM; Blanco Martinez E; Aiwerioghene E; Gorbonos A
    J Robot Surg; 2023 Oct; 17(5):2035-2040. PubMed ID: 37142888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Retzius-sparing Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Associated with Less Bladder Neck Descent and Better Early Continence Outcome.
    Chang LW; Hung SC; Hu JC; Chiu KY
    Anticancer Res; 2018 Jan; 38(1):345-351. PubMed ID: 29277793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Bilateral nerve sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is associated with faster continence recovery but not with erectile function recovery compared with retropubic open prostatectomy: the need for accurate selection of patients.
    Ludovico GM; Dachille G; Pagliarulo G; D'Elia C; Mondaini N; Gacci M; Detti B; Malossini G; Bartoletti R; Cai T
    Oncol Rep; 2013 Jun; 29(6):2445-50. PubMed ID: 23545628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Surgical and functional outcomes of Retzius-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus conventional robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with biopsy-confirmed prostate cancer. Are outcomes worth it? Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    O'Connor-Cordova MA; Macías AGO; Sancen-Herrera JP; Altamirano-Lamarque F; Vargas Del Toro A; Peddinani BK; Canal-Zarate P; O'Connor-Juarez MA
    Prostate; 2023 Nov; 83(15):1395-1414. PubMed ID: 37555617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Comparison of single incision robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with and without extraperitoneal special channel device].
    Ren SQ; Wei Y; Wang YQ; Ou Y; Wang Q; Feng HL; Luo C; Nie Y; Lyu Q; Fan SD; Zhou F; Chen ZJ; Zhong S; Tian JZ; Wang D
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Nov; 101(40):3345-3350. PubMed ID: 34758536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using the Revo-i robotic surgical system: surgical technique and results of the first human trial.
    Chang KD; Abdel Raheem A; Choi YD; Chung BH; Rha KH
    BJU Int; 2018 Sep; 122(3):441-448. PubMed ID: 29645348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: combining the best of retropubic and perineal approaches.
    Lim SK; Kim KH; Shin TY; Han WK; Chung BH; Hong SJ; Choi YD; Rha KH
    BJU Int; 2014 Aug; 114(2):236-44. PubMed ID: 24612011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparative Outcomes of Salvage Retzius-Sparing versus Standard Robotic Prostatectomy: An International, Multi-Surgeon Series.
    Kowalczyk KJ; Madi RH; Eden CG; Sooriakumaran P; Fransis K; Raskin Y; Joniau S; Johnson S; Jacobsohn K; Galfano A; Bocciardi AM; Hwang J; Kim IY; Hu JC
    J Urol; 2021 Nov; 206(5):1184-1191. PubMed ID: 34181471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.