476 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33878887)
1. Deep Learning Improves Speed and Accuracy of Prostate Gland Segmentations on Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Targeted Biopsy.
Soerensen SJC; Fan RE; Seetharaman A; Chen L; Shao W; Bhattacharya I; Kim YH; Sood R; Borre M; Chung BI; To'o KJ; Rusu M; Sonn GA
J Urol; 2021 Sep; 206(3):604-612. PubMed ID: 33878887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Institutional Learning Curve of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy: Temporal Improvements in Cancer Detection in 4 Years.
Meng X; Rosenkrantz AB; Huang R; Deng FM; Wysock JS; Bjurlin MA; Huang WC; Lepor H; Taneja SS
J Urol; 2018 Nov; 200(5):1022-1029. PubMed ID: 29886090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer in magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography-fusion transperineal targeted biopsy for lesions with a prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 score of 3-5.
Hakozaki Y; Matsushima H; Murata T; Masuda T; Hirai Y; Oda M; Kawauchi N; Yokoyama M; Kume H
Int J Urol; 2019 Feb; 26(2):217-222. PubMed ID: 30461076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Machine Segmentation of Pelvic Anatomy in MRI-Assisted Radiosurgery (MARS) for Prostate Cancer Brachytherapy.
Sanders JW; Lewis GD; Thames HD; Kudchadker RJ; Venkatesan AM; Bruno TL; Ma J; Pagel MD; Frank SJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2020 Dec; 108(5):1292-1303. PubMed ID: 32634543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy Improves but Does Not Replace Standard Template Biopsy for the Detection of Prostate Cancer.
Hanna N; Wszolek MF; Mojtahed A; Nicaise E; Wu B; Gelpi-Hammerschmidt FJ; Salari K; Dahl DM; Blute ML; Harisinghani M; Feldman AS
J Urol; 2019 Nov; 202(5):944-951. PubMed ID: 31144593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A prospective, blinded comparison of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-ultrasound fusion and visual estimation in the performance of MR-targeted prostate biopsy: the PROFUS trial.
Wysock JS; Rosenkrantz AB; Huang WC; Stifelman MD; Lepor H; Deng FM; Melamed J; Taneja SS
Eur Urol; 2014 Aug; 66(2):343-51. PubMed ID: 24262102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic Accuracy of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Fusion Guided Targeted Biopsy Evaluated by Transperineal Template Saturation Prostate Biopsy for the Detection and Characterization of Prostate Cancer.
Mortezavi A; Märzendorfer O; Donati OF; Rizzi G; Rupp NJ; Wettstein MS; Gross O; Sulser T; Hermanns T; Eberli D
J Urol; 2018 Aug; 200(2):309-318. PubMed ID: 29474846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of elastic fusion biopsy in daily practice: Results of a multicenter study of 2115 patients.
Oderda M; Marra G; Albisinni S; Altobelli E; Baco E; Beatrici V; Cantiani A; Carbone A; Ciccariello M; Descotes JL; Dubreuil-Chambardel M; Eldred-Evans D; Fasolis G; Ferriero M; Fiard G; Forte V; Giacobbe A; Kumar P; Lacetera V; Mozer P; Muto G; Papalia R; Pastore A; Peltier A; Piechaud T; Simone G; Roche JB; Roupret M; Rouviere O; Van Velthoven R; Gontero P
Int J Urol; 2018 Dec; 25(12):990-997. PubMed ID: 30187529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A 3D-2D Hybrid U-Net Convolutional Neural Network Approach to Prostate Organ Segmentation of Multiparametric MRI.
Ushinsky A; Bardis M; Glavis-Bloom J; Uchio E; Chantaduly C; Nguyentat M; Chow D; Chang PD; Houshyar R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Jan; 216(1):111-116. PubMed ID: 32812797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anterior Localization of Prostate Cancer Suspicious Lesions in 1,161 Patients Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Guided Targeted Biopsies.
Leyh-Bannurah SR; Kachanov M; Beyersdorff D; Preisser F; Tilki D; Fisch M; Graefen M; Budäus L
J Urol; 2018 Nov; 200(5):1035-1040. PubMed ID: 29935274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative Effectiveness of Targeted Prostate Biopsy Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging Ultrasound Fusion Software and Visual Targeting: a Prospective Study.
Lee DJ; Recabal P; Sjoberg DD; Thong A; Lee JK; Eastham JA; Scardino PT; Vargas HA; Coleman J; Ehdaie B
J Urol; 2016 Sep; 196(3):697-702. PubMed ID: 27038768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimizing Spatial Biopsy Sampling for the Detection of Prostate Cancer.
Raman AG; Sarma KV; Raman SS; Priester AM; Mirak SA; Riskin-Jones HH; Dhinagar N; Speier W; Felker E; Sisk AE; Lu D; Kinnaird A; Reiter RE; Marks LS; Arnold CW
J Urol; 2021 Sep; 206(3):595-603. PubMed ID: 33908801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Single Center Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging against Transperineal Prostate Mapping Biopsy: An Analysis of Men with Benign Histology and Insignificant Cancer following Transrectal Ultrasound Biopsy.
Pal RP; Ahmad R; Trecartan S; Voss J; Ahmed S; Bazo A; Lloyd J; Walton TJ
J Urol; 2018 Aug; 200(2):302-308. PubMed ID: 29477717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of complications rates between multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) fusion and systematic TRUS prostatic biopsies.
Queiroz MRG; Falsarella PM; Mariotti GC; Lemos GC; Baroni RH; Mussi TC; Garcia RG
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Feb; 44(2):732-738. PubMed ID: 30255444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Added Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Clinical Nomograms for Predicting Adverse Pathology in Prostate Cancer.
Rayn KN; Bloom JB; Gold SA; Hale GR; Baiocco JA; Mehralivand S; Czarniecki M; Sabarwal VK; Valera V; Wood BJ; Merino MJ; Choyke P; Turkbey B; Pinto PA
J Urol; 2018 Nov; 200(5):1041-1047. PubMed ID: 29852182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Deep Learning for Real-time, Automatic, and Scanner-adapted Prostate (Zone) Segmentation of Transrectal Ultrasound, for Example, Magnetic Resonance Imaging-transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Prostate Biopsy.
van Sloun RJG; Wildeboer RR; Mannaerts CK; Postema AW; Gayet M; Beerlage HP; Salomon G; Wijkstra H; Mischi M
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Jan; 7(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 31028016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prostate Mapping for Cancer Diagnosis: The Madrid Protocol. Transperineal Prostate Biopsies Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion and Micro-Ultrasound Guided Biopsies.
Rodríguez Socarrás ME; Gomez Rivas J; Cuadros Rivera V; Reinoso Elbers J; Llanes González L; Michel Mercado I; Fernandez Del Alamo J; Juarez Del Dago P; Sancha FG
J Urol; 2020 Oct; 204(4):726-733. PubMed ID: 32314932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Prostate MRI Lesion Segmentation Agreement Between Multiple Radiologists and a Fully Automatic Deep Learning System.
Schelb P; Tavakoli AA; Tubtawee T; Hielscher T; Radtke JP; Görtz M; Schütz V; Kuder TA; Schimmöller L; Stenzinger A; Hohenfellner M; Schlemmer HP; Bonekamp D
Rofo; 2021 May; 193(5):559-573. PubMed ID: 33212541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multiparametric MRI-ultrasonography software fusion prostate biopsy: initial results using a stereotactic robotic-assisted transperineal prostate biopsy platform comparing systematic vs targeted biopsy.
Lee AYM; Yang XY; Lee HJ; Law YM; Huang HH; Lau WKO; Lee LS; Ho HSS; Tay KJ; Cheng CWS; Yuen JSP; Chen K
BJU Int; 2020 Nov; 126(5):568-576. PubMed ID: 32438463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Learning curve for fusion magnetic resonance imaging targeted prostate biopsy and three-dimensional transrectal ultrasonography segmentation.
Lenfant L; Beitone C; Troccaz J; Rouprêt M; Seisen T; Voros S; Mozer PC
BJU Int; 2024 Jun; 133(6):709-716. PubMed ID: 38294145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
