These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3387903)

  • 1. Identical 24-hour gastric pH profiles when using intragastric antimony or glass electrodes or aspirated gastric juice.
    Andersen J; Naesdal J; Ström M
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 1988 Apr; 23(3):375-9. PubMed ID: 3387903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Simultaneous comparison of 24-hour intragastric pH recording using glass and antimony electrodes in man.
    Angerer M; Koelzow H; Londong W
    Dig Dis; 1990; 8 Suppl 1():38-45. PubMed ID: 2225518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A single intragastric pH electrode does not accurately measure intragastric acidity.
    Fisher RS; Sher DJ; Donahue D; Senior J; Krevsky B
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1996 Jun; 91(6):1167-72. PubMed ID: 8651165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Glass and antimony electrodes for long-term pH monitoring: a dynamic in vitro comparison.
    Geus WP; Smout AJ; Kooiman JC; Lamers CB; Gues JW
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 1995 Jan; 7(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 7866807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Antimony and glass pH electrodes can be used interchangeably in 24-hour studies of gastric acidity.
    Mela GS; Savarino V; Moretti M; Sumberaz A; Bonifacino G; Zentilin P; Caputo E; Villa G; Celle G
    Dig Dis Sci; 1990 Dec; 35(12):1473-81. PubMed ID: 2253532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gastric aspiration versus antimony and glass pH electrodes. A simultaneous comparative in vivo study.
    Savarino V; Mela GS; Zentilin P; Magnolia MR; Scalabrini P; Valle F; Moretti M; Bonifacino G; Celle G
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 1989 May; 24(4):434-9. PubMed ID: 2781238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Antimony electrodes. Mucosal potential differences and buffer composition adversely affect pH measurements in the stomach.
    Opekun AR; Smith JL; Graham DY
    Dig Dis Sci; 1990 Aug; 35(8):950-5. PubMed ID: 2384040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A technique for screening of achlorhydria and hypochlorhydria during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
    Andersen J; Ström M
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 1990 Oct; 25(10):1084-8. PubMed ID: 2263881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Intragastric pH probe functioning in studies of solutions with nonuniform pH].
    Nevskiĭ DI; Rakitin AB; Rakitin BV
    Med Tekh; 2007; (2):17-9. PubMed ID: 17650642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 24-H comparison between pH values of continuous intraluminal recording and simultaneous gastric aspiration.
    Savarino V; Mela GS; Scalabrini P; Magnolia MR; Percario G; Di Timoteo E; Celle G
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 1987 Mar; 22(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 3576125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electrochemical aspects of pH electrodes.
    Emde C
    Dig Dis; 1990; 8 Suppl 1():18-22. PubMed ID: 2225514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Gastric aspiration technique for pH recording: a critical evaluation of this method.
    Dammann HG; Dreyer M; Kangah R; Wolf N
    Dig Dis; 1990; 8 Suppl 1():3-9. PubMed ID: 2225516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of gastric acidity in intensive care patients: intermittent pH registration cannot replace continuous pH monitoring.
    Bonten MJ; Gaillard CA; Stockbrügger RW; van Tiel FH; van der Geest S; Stobberingh EE
    Intensive Care Med; 1996 Mar; 22(3):220-5. PubMed ID: 8727435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The estimation of gastric secretory capacity by the telemetering method of pH-sensitive radiocapsule.
    Misaki F; Kawai K
    Gastroenterol Jpn; 1976; 11(2):100-4. PubMed ID: 10221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diurnal variation in intragastric pH in children with and without peptic ulcers.
    Nagita A; Amemoto K; Yoden A; Aoki S; Sakaguchi M; Ashida K; Mino M
    Pediatr Res; 1996 Oct; 40(4):528-32. PubMed ID: 8888278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Standardization of electrode positioning and composition of meals for long-term intragastric pH metry in man.
    Londong W; Angerer M; Bosch R; Koelzow H
    Dig Dis; 1990; 8 Suppl 1():46-53. PubMed ID: 2225519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Regional differences in gastric acidity and antacid distribution: is a single pH electrode sufficient?
    Fisher RS; Sher DJ; Donahue D; Knight LC; Maurer A; Urbain JL; Krevsky B
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1997 Feb; 92(2):263-70. PubMed ID: 9040203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Stomach probe for simultaneous double-electrode intragastric pH measurement and the aspiration of the stomach contents].
    Bershadenko DD; Korzh NI; Novoselets SA
    Lab Delo; 1982; (2):77-9. PubMed ID: 6174816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is a fluoroscopic verification of the electrode position necessary in ambulatory intragastric pH monitoring?
    Wilder-Smith CH; Gennoni MA; Triller J; Scheurer U; Merki HS
    Digestion; 1992; 52(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 1426691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ambulatory oesophageal pH monitoring: a comparison between antimony, ISFET, and glass pH electrodes.
    Hemmink GJ; Weusten BL; Oors J; Bredenoord AJ; Timmer R; Smout AJ
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2010 May; 22(5):572-7. PubMed ID: 20009939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.