BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33879141)

  • 1. Clinicians' knowledge and attitudes towards patient reported outcomes in colorectal cancer care - insights from qualitative interviews.
    Sibert NT; Kowalski C; Pfaff H; Wesselmann S; Breidenbach C
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2021 Apr; 21(1):366. PubMed ID: 33879141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Could existing infrastructure for using patient-reported outcomes as quality measures also be used for individual care in patients with colorectal cancer?
    Breidenbach C; Kowalski C; Wesselmann S; Sibert NT
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2021 May; 21(1):448. PubMed ID: 33975586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implementation analysis of patient reported outcomes (PROs) in oncological routine care: an observational study protocol.
    Görlach MG; Schrage T; Bokemeyer C; Kröger N; Müller V; Petersen C; Betz CS; Krüll A; Schulz H; Bleich C
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2020 Jan; 18(1):3. PubMed ID: 31898544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinicians' perspectives on the integration of electronic patient-reported outcomes into dermatology clinics: a qualitative study.
    Taliercio VL; Snyder AM; Biggs AM; Kean J; Hess R; Duffin KC; Cizik AM; Secrest AM
    Qual Life Res; 2022 Jun; 31(6):1719-1725. PubMed ID: 34727299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in routine head and neck cancer care: What do health professionals perceive as barriers and facilitators?
    Nguyen H; Butow P; Dhillon H; Morris L; Brown A; West K; Sundaresan P
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2020 Oct; 64(5):704-710. PubMed ID: 32394587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Primary care physician's (PCP) perceived value of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical practice: a mixed methods study.
    Mou D; Horn DM; Heng M; Castillo-Angeles M; Ladin K; Frendl D; Kaur M; Del Carmen M; Sequist TD; Sisodia RC
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2022 Mar; 31(3):221-229. PubMed ID: 34016689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Developing an e-learning course on the use of PRO measures in oncological practice: health care professionals' preferences for learning content and methods.
    Sztankay M; Wintner LM; Roggendorf S; Nordhausen T; Dirven L; Taphoorn MJB; Verdonck-de Leeuw IM; Velikova G; Bottomley A; Kulis D; Kachel T; Schmidt H;
    Support Care Cancer; 2022 Mar; 30(3):2555-2567. PubMed ID: 34797424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using Stakeholder Engagement to Overcome Barriers to Implementing Patient-reported Outcomes (PROs) in Cancer Care Delivery: Approaches From 3 Prospective Studies.
    Stover AM; Tompkins Stricker C; Hammelef K; Henson S; Carr P; Jansen J; Deal AM; Bennett AV; Basch EM
    Med Care; 2019 May; 57 Suppl 5 Suppl 1():S92-S99. PubMed ID: 30985602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patient and Clinician Perspectives on Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in the Management of Advanced CKD: A Qualitative Study.
    Aiyegbusi OL; Kyte D; Cockwell P; Marshall T; Dutton M; Walmsley-Allen N; Slade A; McMullan C; Calvert M
    Am J Kidney Dis; 2019 Aug; 74(2):167-178. PubMed ID: 31003865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Understanding why cancer patients accept or turn down psycho-oncological support: a prospective observational study including patients' and clinicians' perspectives on communication about distress.
    Zwahlen D; Tondorf T; Rothschild S; Koller MT; Rochlitz C; Kiss A
    BMC Cancer; 2017 May; 17(1):385. PubMed ID: 28558713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exploring organisational mechanisms in PRO-based follow-up in routine outpatient care - an interpretive description of the clinician perspective.
    Mejdahl CT; Schougaard LMV; Hjollund NH; Riiskjær E; Lomborg K
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Jul; 18(1):546. PubMed ID: 30001729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attitudes, experiences, and preferences of ophthalmic professionals regarding routine use of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice.
    Robertson AO; Tadić V; Rahi JS
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0243563. PubMed ID: 33275625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exploring clinicians' attitudes about using aspirin for risk reduction in people with Lynch Syndrome with no personal diagnosis of colorectal cancer.
    Chen Y; Peate M; Kaur R; Meiser B; Wong T; Kirk J; Ward RL; Goodwin A; Macrae F; Hiller J; Trainer AH; Mitchell G
    Fam Cancer; 2017 Jan; 16(1):99-109. PubMed ID: 27677266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A qualitative study of patients' perceptions of the utility of patient-reported outcome measures of symptoms in primary care clinics.
    Talib TL; DeChant P; Kean J; Monahan PO; Haggstrom DA; Stout ME; Kroenke K
    Qual Life Res; 2018 Dec; 27(12):3157-3166. PubMed ID: 30109471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Views of psycho-oncologists, physicians, and nurses on cancer care-A qualitative study.
    Steven B; Lange L; Schulz H; Bleich C
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210325. PubMed ID: 30650112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating the implementation and use of patient-reported outcome measures in a mental health hospital in Denmark: a qualitative study.
    Kristensen S; Holmskov J; Baandrup L; Videbech P; Bonde M; Mainz J
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2022 Mar; 34(Supplement_1):ii49-ii58. PubMed ID: 35357442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Training clinicians in how to use patient-reported outcome measures in routine clinical practice.
    Santana MJ; Haverman L; Absolom K; Takeuchi E; Feeny D; Grootenhuis M; Velikova G
    Qual Life Res; 2015 Jul; 24(7):1707-18. PubMed ID: 25589231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Heidelberg Milestones Communication Approach (MCA) for patients with prognosis <12 months: protocol for a mixed-methods study including a randomized controlled trial.
    Siegle A; Villalobos M; Bossert J; Krug K; Hagelskamp L; Krisam J; Handtke V; Deis N; Jünger J; Wensing M; Thomas M
    Trials; 2018 Aug; 19(1):438. PubMed ID: 30107809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. PRO-ONKO-selection of patient-reported outcome assessments for the clinical use in cancer patients-a mixed-method multicenter cross-sectional exploratory study.
    Schmidt H; Merkel D; Koehler M; Flechtner HH; Sigle J; Klinge B; Jordan K; Vordermark D; Landenberger M; Jahn P
    Support Care Cancer; 2016 Jun; 24(6):2503-12. PubMed ID: 26676238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relevant content for a patient-reported outcomes questionnaire for use in oncology clinical practice: Putting doctors and patients on the same page.
    Snyder CF; Jensen RE; Geller G; Carducci MA; Wu AW
    Qual Life Res; 2010 Sep; 19(7):1045-55. PubMed ID: 20424920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.