129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33879743)
1. Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using ultrasound pachymetry, noncontact tonopachy, Pentacam HR, and Fourier-domain OCT.
Kim JS; Rho CR; Cho YW; Shin J
Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Apr; 100(16):e25638. PubMed ID: 33879743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measured by Standard Ultrasound Pachymetry, Corneal Topography, Tono-Pachymetry and Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography.
González-Pérez J; Queiruga Piñeiro J; Sánchez García Á; González Méijome JM
Curr Eye Res; 2018 Jul; 43(7):866-872. PubMed ID: 29634372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of corneal biomechanics, tonometry and pachymetry with the Corvis ST in myopia.
Wang X; McAlinden C; Zhang H; Yan J; Wang D; Wei W; Mi S
Sci Rep; 2021 Feb; 11(1):3041. PubMed ID: 33542296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of central corneal thickness in healthy eyes using ultrasound pachymetry, non-contact specular microscopy and a high-resolution Scheimpflug camera.
Soulantzou K; Plakitsi A; Chalkiadaki E; Anastasopoulou M; Karmiris E
Int Ophthalmol; 2023 Feb; 43(2):363-370. PubMed ID: 35864284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comprehensive comparison of central corneal thickness measurement.
Huang J; Pesudovs K; Yu A; Wright T; Wen D; Li M; Yu Y; Wang Q
Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Aug; 88(8):940-9. PubMed ID: 21602731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Measurement of central corneal thickness by high-resolution Scheimpflug imaging, Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography and ultrasound pachymetry.
Chen S; Huang J; Wen D; Chen W; Huang D; Wang Q
Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Aug; 90(5):449-55. PubMed ID: 20560892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Canine central corneal thickness measurements via Pentacam-HR
Wolfel AE; Pederson SL; Cleymaet AM; Hess AM; Freeman KS
Vet Ophthalmol; 2018 Jul; 21(4):362-370. PubMed ID: 29034562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Corneal thickness in keratoconus: comparing optical, ultrasound, and optical coherence tomography pachymetry.
Dutta D; Rao HL; Addepalli UK; Vaddavalli PK
Ophthalmology; 2013 Mar; 120(3):457-463. PubMed ID: 23177363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements with Four Different New Devices and Ultrasound Pachymetry.
Şimşek C; Kaya C; Karalezli A
Turk J Ophthalmol; 2022 Oct; 52(5):318-323. PubMed ID: 36317802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Corneal thickness measurements with the RTVue, Casia-2, and Pentacam devices in patients with mild-to-moderate keratoconus: a comparative study.
Sun B; Zhang X; Sun L; Huang Y; Tian M; Shen Y; Ding L; Zhou X
BMC Ophthalmol; 2023 Jan; 23(1):36. PubMed ID: 36703165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison between Tonopachy and other tonometric and pachymetric devices.
Lee YG; Kim JH; Kim NR; Kim CY; Lee ES
Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Jul; 88(7):843-9. PubMed ID: 21499167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Corneal Thickness Measurements After Customized Corneal Crosslinking Using High-Resolution Optical Coherence Tomography and Scheimpflug Tomography.
Mendes Baiao T; Wendelstein J; Seiler TG
Cornea; 2023 Sep; 42(9):1104-1109. PubMed ID: 36853600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness with Ultrasound Pachymetry, Noncontact Specular Microscopy and Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography.
Erdur SK; Demirci G; Dikkaya F; Kocabora MS; Ozsutcu M
Semin Ophthalmol; 2018; 33(6):782-787. PubMed ID: 29509052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of topcon optical coherence tomography and ultrasound pachymetry.
Northey LC; Gifford P; Boneham GC
Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Dec; 89(12):1708-14. PubMed ID: 23190715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of RTVue optical coherence tomography, Pentacam, and ultrasonic pachymetry for the measurement of central corneal thickness.
Nam SM; Im CY; Lee HK; Kim EK; Kim TI; Seo KY
Ophthalmology; 2010 Nov; 117(11):2096-103. PubMed ID: 20557940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Meta-analysis of Pentacam vs. ultrasound pachymetry in central corneal thickness measurement in normal, post-LASIK or PRK, and keratoconic or keratoconus-suspect eyes.
Wu W; Wang Y; Xu L
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2014 Jan; 252(1):91-9. PubMed ID: 24218039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison between Pentacam-HR and optical coherence tomographycentral corneal thickness measurements in healthy feline eyes.
Cleymaet AM; Hess AM; Freeman KS
Vet Ophthalmol; 2016 Jul; 19 Suppl 1():105-14. PubMed ID: 27370363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparability and repeatability of pachymetry in keratoconus using four noncontact techniques.
Kumar M; Shetty R; Jayadev C; Dutta D
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2015 Sep; 63(9):722-7. PubMed ID: 26632128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using Galilei, HR Pentacam, and ultrasound.
Jahadi Hosseini HR; Katbab A; Khalili MR; Abtahi MB
Cornea; 2010 Oct; 29(10):1091-5. PubMed ID: 20628301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Repeatability and agreement of corneal thickness measurement with Pentacam Scheimpflug photography and Visante optical coherence tomography].
Huang JH; Ge LN; Wen DZ; Chen SH; Yu Y; Wang QM
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Mar; 49(3):250-6. PubMed ID: 23866707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
