134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33880686)
1. Tumor volume-adapted SUV
Mosleh-Shirazi MA; Nasiri-Feshani Z; Ghafarian P; Alavi M; Haddadi G; Ketabi A
Jpn J Radiol; 2021 Aug; 39(8):811-823. PubMed ID: 33880686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of time of flight and point spread function on quantitative parameters of lung lesions in
Huang K; Feng Y; Liang W; Li L
BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Nov; 21(1):169. PubMed ID: 34773998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The value of Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction for improving lesion conspicuity of malignant lung tumors on
Kurita Y; Ichikawa Y; Nakanishi T; Tomita Y; Hasegawa D; Murashima S; Hirano T; Sakuma H
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Apr; 34(4):272-279. PubMed ID: 32060780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Changes of [
Liu Y; Gao MJ; Zhou J; Du F; Chen L; Huang ZK; Hu JB; Lou C
BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Sep; 21(1):133. PubMed ID: 34530768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimization of PET/CT image quality using the GE 'Sharp IR' point-spread function reconstruction algorithm.
Vennart NJ; Bird N; Buscombe J; Cheow HK; Nowosinska E; Heard S
Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Jun; 38(6):471-479. PubMed ID: 28394818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6.
Lasnon C; Majdoub M; Lavigne B; Do P; Madelaine J; Visvikis D; Hatt M; Aide N
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Dec; 43(13):2324-2335. PubMed ID: 27325312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of point spread function modelling and time of flight on FDG uptake measurements in lung lesions using alternative filtering strategies.
Armstrong IS; Kelly MD; Williams HA; Matthews JC
EJNMMI Phys; 2014 Dec; 1(1):99. PubMed ID: 26501457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The association of tumor-to-background ratios and SUVmax deviations related to point spread function and time-of-flight F18-FDG-PET/CT reconstruction in colorectal liver metastases.
Rogasch JM; Steffen IG; Hofheinz F; Großer OS; Furth C; Mohnike K; Hass P; Walke M; Apostolova I; Amthauer H
EJNMMI Res; 2015; 5():31. PubMed ID: 25992306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Verification of the tumor volume delineation method using a fixed threshold of peak standardized uptake value.
Koyama K; Mitsumoto T; Shiraishi T; Tsuda K; Nishiyama A; Inoue K; Yoshikawa K; Hatano K; Kubota K; Fukushi M
Radiol Phys Technol; 2017 Sep; 10(3):311-320. PubMed ID: 28676945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical evaluation of whole-body oncologic PET with time-of-flight and point-spread function for the hybrid PET/MR system.
Shang K; Cui B; Ma J; Shuai D; Liang Z; Jansen F; Zhou Y; Lu J; Zhao G
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Aug; 93():70-75. PubMed ID: 28668434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection of sub-centimeter lesions using digital TOF-PET/CT system combined with Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm.
Miwa K; Wagatsuma K; Nemoto R; Masubuchi M; Kamitaka Y; Yamao T; Hiratsuka S; Yamaguchi M; Yoshii T; Kobayashi R; Miyaji N; Ishii K
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Oct; 34(10):762-771. PubMed ID: 32623569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of different signal-to-background ratios on spatial resolution and F18-FDG-PET quantification using point spread function and time-of-flight reconstruction.
Rogasch JM; Hofheinz F; Lougovski A; Furth C; Ruf J; Großer OS; Mohnike K; Hass P; Walke M; Amthauer H; Steffen IG
EJNMMI Phys; 2014 Dec; 1(1):12. PubMed ID: 26501454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is the standard uptake value (SUV) appropriate for quantification in clinical PET imaging? - Variability induced by different SUV measurements and varying reconstruction methods.
Brendle C; Kupferschläger J; Nikolaou K; la Fougère C; Gatidis S; Pfannenberg C
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jan; 84(1):158-162. PubMed ID: 25467224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Harmonizing FDG PET quantification while maintaining optimal lesion detection: prospective multicentre validation in 517 oncology patients.
Quak E; Le Roux PY; Hofman MS; Robin P; Bourhis D; Callahan J; Binns D; Desmonts C; Salaun PY; Hicks RJ; Aide N
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Dec; 42(13):2072-82. PubMed ID: 26219870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improvement in PET/CT image quality with a combination of point-spread function and time-of-flight in relation to reconstruction parameters.
Akamatsu G; Ishikawa K; Mitsumoto K; Taniguchi T; Ohya N; Baba S; Abe K; Sasaki M
J Nucl Med; 2012 Nov; 53(11):1716-22. PubMed ID: 22952340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Brain PET imaging optimization with time of flight and point spread function modelling.
Prieto E; Martí-Climent JM; Morán V; Sancho L; Barbés B; Arbizu J; Richter JA
Phys Med; 2015 Dec; 31(8):948-955. PubMed ID: 26249138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using EQ·PET to reduce reconstruction-dependent variations in [
Vanhoutte M; Semah F; Lopes R; Jaillard A; Petyt G; Aziz AL; Lahousse H; Declerck J; Pasquier F; Spottiswoode B; Fahmi R
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Aug; 64(17):175002. PubMed ID: 31344691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical Application of a High Sensitivity BGO PET/CT Scanner: Effects of Acquisition Protocols and Reconstruction Parameters on Lesions Quantification.
De Ponti E; Crivellaro C; Morzenti S; Monaco L; Todde S; Landoni C; Elisei F; Musarra M; Guerra L
Curr Radiopharm; 2022; 15(3):218-227. PubMed ID: 34994322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reduction of emission time for [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT using the digital biograph vision: a phantom study.
Fragoso Costa P; Jentzen W; SÜßELBECK F; Fendler WP; Rischpler C; Herrmann K; Conti M; Kersting D; Weber M
Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Mar; 67(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 34309334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of Statistical Fluctuation on Reproducibility and Accuracy of SUVmax and SUVpeak: A Phantom Study.
Akamatsu G; Ikari Y; Nishida H; Nishio T; Ohnishi A; Maebatake A; Sasaki M; Senda M
J Nucl Med Technol; 2015 Sep; 43(3):222-6. PubMed ID: 26271802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
