133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33880686)
41. Diagnostic performance of
Hotta M; Minamimoto R; Yano H; Gohda Y; Shuno Y
Cancer Imaging; 2018 Jan; 18(1):4. PubMed ID: 29378659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Clinical evaluation of a block sequential regularized expectation maximization reconstruction algorithm in 18F-FDG PET/CT studies.
Sah BR; Stolzmann P; Delso G; Wollenweber SD; Hüllner M; Hakami YA; Queiroz MA; Barbosa FG; von Schulthess GK; Pietsch C; Veit-Haibach P
Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Jan; 38(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 27755394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Applications of both time of flight and point spread function in brain PET image reconstruction.
Shao X; Shao X; Wang X; Wang Y
Nucl Med Commun; 2016 Apr; 37(4):422-7. PubMed ID: 26637071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Time-of-Flight Information Improved the Detectability of Subcentimeter Spheres Using a Clinical PET/CT Scanner.
Hashimoto N; Morita K; Tsutsui Y; Himuro K; Baba S; Sasaki M
J Nucl Med Technol; 2018 Sep; 46(3):268-273. PubMed ID: 29599404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Improvement in PET/CT image quality in overweight patients with PSF and TOF.
Taniguchi T; Akamatsu G; Kasahara Y; Mitsumoto K; Baba S; Tsutsui Y; Himuro K; Mikasa S; Kidera D; Sasaki M
Ann Nucl Med; 2015 Jan; 29(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 25258046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. A quantitative clinical evaluation of simultaneous reconstruction of attenuation and activity in time-of-flight PET.
Zhang H; Wang J; Li N; Zhang Y; Cui J; Huo L; Zhang H
BMC Med Imaging; 2023 Feb; 23(1):35. PubMed ID: 36849906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Reproducibility of F18-FDG PET radiomic features for different cervical tumor segmentation methods, gray-level discretization, and reconstruction algorithms.
Altazi BA; Zhang GG; Fernandez DC; Montejo ME; Hunt D; Werner J; Biagioli MC; Moros EG
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 18(6):32-48. PubMed ID: 28891217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Variability of average SUV from several hottest voxels is lower than that of SUVmax and SUVpeak.
Laffon E; Lamare F; de Clermont H; Burger IA; Marthan R
Eur Radiol; 2014 Aug; 24(8):1964-70. PubMed ID: 24895030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Influence of cold walls on PET image quantification and volume segmentation: a phantom study.
Berthon B; Marshall C; Edwards A; Evans M; Spezi E
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):082505. PubMed ID: 23927350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Ratio of Lymph Node to Primary Tumor SUV on PET/CT Accurately Predicts Nodal Malignancy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.
Mattes MD; Moshchinsky AB; Ahsanuddin S; Rizk NP; Foster A; Wu AJ; Ashamalla H; Weber WA; Rimner A
Clin Lung Cancer; 2015 Nov; 16(6):e253-8. PubMed ID: 26163919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Multicenter quantitative
Vosoughi H; Momennezhad M; Emami F; Hajizadeh M; Rahmim A; Geramifar P
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2023 Apr; 13(4):2218-2233. PubMed ID: 37064407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Reconstructed spatial resolution and contrast recovery with Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction (Q.Clear) for FDG-PET compared to time-of-flight (TOF) with point spread function (PSF).
Rogasch JM; Suleiman S; Hofheinz F; Bluemel S; Lukas M; Amthauer H; Furth C
EJNMMI Phys; 2020 Jan; 7(1):2. PubMed ID: 31925574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. A NIM PET/CT phantom for evaluating the PET image quality of micro-lesions and the performance parameters of CT.
Lu S; Zhang P; Li C; Sun J; Liu W; Zhang P
BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Nov; 21(1):165. PubMed ID: 34749660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The SRT reconstruction algorithm for semiquantification in PET imaging.
Kastis GA; Gaitanis A; Samartzis AP; Fokas AS
Med Phys; 2015 Oct; 42(10):5970-82. PubMed ID: 26429272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Impact of PET/CT system, reconstruction protocol, data analysis method, and repositioning on PET/CT precision: An experimental evaluation using an oncology and brain phantom.
Mansor S; Pfaehler E; Heijtel D; Lodge MA; Boellaard R; Yaqub M
Med Phys; 2017 Dec; 44(12):6413-6424. PubMed ID: 28994465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Optimization of PET reconstruction algorithm, SUV thresholding algorithm and PET acquisition time in clinical 11C-acetate PET/CT.
Strandberg S; Hashemi A; Axelsson J; Riklund K
PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0209169. PubMed ID: 30543705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Generating harmonized SUV within the EANM EARL accreditation program: software approach versus EARL-compliant reconstruction.
Lasnon C; Salomon T; Desmonts C; Dô P; Oulkhouir Y; Madelaine J; Aide N
Ann Nucl Med; 2017 Feb; 31(2):125-134. PubMed ID: 27812791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Towards guidelines to harmonize textural features in PET: Haralick textural features vary with image noise, but exposure-invariant domains enable comparable PET radiomics.
Prenosil GA; Weitzel T; Fürstner M; Hentschel M; Krause T; Cumming P; Rominger A; Klaeser B
PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0229560. PubMed ID: 32176698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Reducing Radiation Exposure to Paediatric Patients Undergoing [18F]FDG-PET/CT Imaging.
Kertész H; Beyer T; London K; Saleh H; Chung D; Rausch I; Cal-Gonzalez J; Kitsos T; Kench PL
Mol Imaging Biol; 2021 Oct; 23(5):775-786. PubMed ID: 33846898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Improving the detection of small lesions using a state-of-the-art time-of-flight PET/CT system and small-voxel reconstructions.
Koopman D; van Dalen JA; Lagerweij MC; Arkies H; de Boer J; Oostdijk AH; Slump CH; Jager PL
J Nucl Med Technol; 2015 Mar; 43(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 25613334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
