170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33881369)
1. Estimation of required sample size for external validation of risk models for binary outcomes.
Pavlou M; Qu C; Omar RZ; Seaman SR; Steyerberg EW; White IR; Ambler G
Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Oct; 30(10):2187-2206. PubMed ID: 33881369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimum sample size for external validation of a clinical prediction model with a binary outcome.
Riley RD; Debray TPA; Collins GS; Archer L; Ensor J; van Smeden M; Snell KIE
Stat Med; 2021 Aug; 40(19):4230-4251. PubMed ID: 34031906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimum sample size calculations for external validation of a clinical prediction model with a time-to-event outcome.
Riley RD; Collins GS; Ensor J; Archer L; Booth S; Mozumder SI; Rutherford MJ; van Smeden M; Lambert PC; Snell KIE
Stat Med; 2022 Mar; 41(7):1280-1295. PubMed ID: 34915593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prognostic models for identifying risk of poor outcome in people with acute ankle sprains: the SPRAINED development and external validation study.
Keene DJ; Schlüssel MM; Thompson J; Hagan DA; Williams MA; Byrne C; Goodacre S; Cooke M; Gwilym S; Hormbrey P; Bostock J; Haywood K; Wilson D; Collins GS; Lamb SE
Health Technol Assess; 2018 Nov; 22(64):1-112. PubMed ID: 30474592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prognostic models of survival in patients with advanced incurable cancer: the PiPS2 observational study.
Stone P; Kalpakidou A; Todd C; Griffiths J; Keeley V; Spencer K; Buckle P; Finlay DA; Vickerstaff V; Omar RZ
Health Technol Assess; 2021 May; 25(28):1-118. PubMed ID: 34018486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Meta-analysis of prediction model performance across multiple studies: Which scale helps ensure between-study normality for the C-statistic and calibration measures?
Snell KI; Ensor J; Debray TP; Moons KG; Riley RD
Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Nov; 27(11):3505-3522. PubMed ID: 28480827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimum sample size for external validation of a clinical prediction model with a continuous outcome.
Archer L; Snell KIE; Ensor J; Hudda MT; Collins GS; Riley RD
Stat Med; 2021 Jan; 40(1):133-146. PubMed ID: 33150684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. External validation of clinical prediction models: simulation-based sample size calculations were more reliable than rules-of-thumb.
Snell KIE; Archer L; Ensor J; Bonnett LJ; Debray TPA; Phillips B; Collins GS; Riley RD
J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Jul; 135():79-89. PubMed ID: 33596458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does the SORG Algorithm Predict 5-year Survival in Patients with Chondrosarcoma? An External Validation.
Bongers MER; Thio QCBS; Karhade AV; Stor ML; Raskin KA; Lozano Calderon SA; DeLaney TF; Ferrone ML; Schwab JH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Oct; 477(10):2296-2303. PubMed ID: 31107338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A note on estimating the Cox-Snell R
Riley RD; Van Calster B; Collins GS
Stat Med; 2021 Feb; 40(4):859-864. PubMed ID: 33283904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sample size considerations for the external validation of a multivariable prognostic model: a resampling study.
Collins GS; Ogundimu EO; Altman DG
Stat Med; 2016 Jan; 35(2):214-26. PubMed ID: 26553135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development and validation of Prediction models for Risks of complications in Early-onset Pre-eclampsia (PREP): a prospective cohort study.
Thangaratinam S; Allotey J; Marlin N; Mol BW; Von Dadelszen P; Ganzevoort W; Akkermans J; Ahmed A; Daniels J; Deeks J; Ismail K; Barnard AM; Dodds J; Kerry S; Moons C; Riley RD; Khan KS
Health Technol Assess; 2017 Apr; 21(18):1-100. PubMed ID: 28412995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance of prediction models for nephropathy in people with type 2 diabetes: systematic review and external validation study.
Slieker RC; van der Heijden AAWA; Siddiqui MK; Langendoen-Gort M; Nijpels G; Herings R; Feenstra TL; Moons KGM; Bell S; Elders PJ; 't Hart LM; Beulens JWJ
BMJ; 2021 Sep; 374():n2134. PubMed ID: 34583929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predicting the cumulative chance of live birth over multiple complete cycles of in vitro fertilization: an external validation study.
Leijdekkers JA; Eijkemans MJC; van Tilborg TC; Oudshoorn SC; McLernon DJ; Bhattacharya S; Mol BWJ; Broekmans FJM; Torrance HL;
Hum Reprod; 2018 Sep; 33(9):1684-1695. PubMed ID: 30085143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimating the natural indirect effect and the mediation proportion via the product method.
Cheng C; Spiegelman D; Li F
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Nov; 21(1):253. PubMed ID: 34800985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Leave-one-out cross-validation, penalization, and differential bias of some prediction model performance measures-a simulation study.
Geroldinger A; Lusa L; Nold M; Heinze G
Diagn Progn Res; 2023 May; 7(1):9. PubMed ID: 37127679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of estimators to evaluate the discriminatory power of time-to-event models.
Schmid M; Potapov S
Stat Med; 2012 Oct; 31(23):2588-609. PubMed ID: 22829422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sample size for binary logistic prediction models: Beyond events per variable criteria.
van Smeden M; Moons KG; de Groot JA; Collins GS; Altman DG; Eijkemans MJ; Reitsma JB
Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Aug; 28(8):2455-2474. PubMed ID: 29966490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adaptive sample size determination for the development of clinical prediction models.
Christodoulou E; van Smeden M; Edlinger M; Timmerman D; Wanitschek M; Steyerberg EW; Van Calster B
Diagn Progn Res; 2021 Mar; 5(1):6. PubMed ID: 33745449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A readily available improvement over method of moments for intra-cluster correlation estimation in the context of cluster randomized trials and fitting a GEE-type marginal model for binary outcomes.
Westgate PM
Clin Trials; 2019 Feb; 16(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 30295512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
