153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33882243)
1. Comparison of prostate imaging reporting and data system v2.1 and 2 in transition and peripheral zones: evaluation of interreader agreement and diagnostic performance in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer.
Urase Y; Ueno Y; Tamada T; Sofue K; Takahashi S; Hinata N; Harada K; Fujisawa M; Murakami T
Br J Radiol; 2022 Mar; 95(1131):20201434. PubMed ID: 33882243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. PI-RADS Versions 2 and 2.1: Interobserver Agreement and Diagnostic Performance in Peripheral and Transition Zone Lesions Among Six Radiologists.
Bhayana R; O'Shea A; Anderson MA; Bradley WR; Gottumukkala RV; Mojtahed A; Pierce TT; Harisinghani M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Jul; 217(1):141-151. PubMed ID: 32903060
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of interreader reproducibility of the prostate imaging reporting and data system and likert scales for evaluation of multiparametric prostate MRI.
Rosenkrantz AB; Lim RP; Haghighi M; Somberg MB; Babb JS; Taneja SS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Oct; 201(4):W612-8. PubMed ID: 24059400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic Accuracy and Interobserver Agreement of PI-RADS Version 2 and Version 2.1 for the Detection of Transition Zone Prostate Cancers.
Wei CG; Zhang YY; Pan P; Chen T; Yu HC; Dai GC; Tu J; Yang S; Zhao WL; Shen JK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 May; 216(5):1247-1256. PubMed ID: 32755220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Inter-Reader Variability Using PI-RADS v2 Versus PI-RADS v2.1: Most New Disagreement Stems from Scores 1 and 2.
Beetz NL; Haas M; Baur A; Konietschke F; Roy A; Hamm CA; Rudolph MM; Shnayien S; Hamm B; Cash H; Asbach P; Penzkofer T
Rofo; 2022 Aug; 194(8):852-861. PubMed ID: 35545106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interreader variability in prostate MRI reporting using Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2.1.
Brembilla G; Dell'Oglio P; Stabile A; Damascelli A; Brunetti L; Ravelli S; Cristel G; Schiani E; Venturini E; Grippaldi D; Mendola V; Rancoita PMV; Esposito A; Briganti A; Montorsi F; Del Maschio A; De Cobelli F
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jun; 30(6):3383-3392. PubMed ID: 32052171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interreader agreement of PI-RADS v. 2 in assessing prostate cancer with multiparametric MRI: A study using whole-mount histology as the standard of reference.
Girometti R; Giannarini G; Greco F; Isola M; Cereser L; Como G; Sioletic S; Pizzolitto S; Crestani A; Ficarra V; Zuiani C
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Feb; 49(2):546-555. PubMed ID: 30187600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Head-to-head comparison of PI-RADS v2 and PI-RADS v1.
Polanec S; Helbich TH; Bickel H; Pinker-Domenig K; Georg D; Shariat SF; Aulitzky W; Susani M; Baltzer PA
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 85(6):1125-31. PubMed ID: 27161062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of PI-RADS version 2 and PI-RADS version 2.1 for the detection of transition zone prostate cancer.
Tamada T; Kido A; Takeuchi M; Yamamoto A; Miyaji Y; Kanomata N; Sone T
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Dec; 121():108704. PubMed ID: 31669798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multiparametric MRI of the prostate: diagnostic performance and interreader agreement of two scoring systems.
Lin WC; Muglia VF; Silva GE; Chodraui Filho S; Reis RB; Westphalen AC
Br J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 89(1062):20151056. PubMed ID: 27007818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Direct comparison of PI-RADS version 2 and version 1 regarding interreader agreement and diagnostic accuracy for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
Becker AS; Cornelius A; Reiner CS; Stocker D; Ulbrich EJ; Barth BK; Mortezavi A; Eberli D; Donati OF
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Sep; 94():58-63. PubMed ID: 28941761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Biparametric and Multiparametric MRI for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection With PI-RADS Version 2.1.
Tamada T; Kido A; Yamamoto A; Takeuchi M; Miyaji Y; Moriya T; Sone T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Jan; 53(1):283-291. PubMed ID: 32614123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of diagnostic performance and inter-reader agreement between PI-RADS v2.1 and PI-RADS v2: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lee CH; Vellayappan B; Tan CH
Br J Radiol; 2022 Mar; 95(1131):20210509. PubMed ID: 34520694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Proposed Adjustments to PI-RADS Version 2 Decision Rules: Impact on Prostate Cancer Detection.
Rosenkrantz AB; Babb JS; Taneja SS; Ream JM
Radiology; 2017 Apr; 283(1):119-129. PubMed ID: 27783538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interobserver Agreement and Positivity of PI-RADS Version 2 Among Radiologists with Different Levels of Experience.
Mussi TC; Yamauchi FI; Tridente CF; Tachibana A; Tonso VM; Recchimuzzi DR; de Souza Leão LR; Luz DC; Martins T; Baroni RH
Acad Radiol; 2019 Aug; 26(8):1017-1022. PubMed ID: 30268722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Prostate Imaging and Reporting Data System V2.0 and V2.1 for Evaluation of Transition Zone Lesions: A 5-Reader 202-Patient Analysis.
Kim N; Kim S; Prabhu V; Shanbhogue K; Smereka P; Tong A; Anthopolos R; Taneja SS; Rosenkrantz AB
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 46(4):523-529. PubMed ID: 35405714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Direct Comparison of PI-RADS Version 2 and 2.1 in Transition Zone Lesions for Detection of Prostate Cancer: Preliminary Experience.
Byun J; Park KJ; Kim MH; Kim JK
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Aug; 52(2):577-586. PubMed ID: 32045072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of observation size and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value in PI-RADS v2.1 assessment category 4 and 5 observations compared to adverse pathological outcomes.
Abreu-Gomez J; Walker D; Alotaibi T; McInnes MDF; Flood TA; Schieda N
Eur Radiol; 2020 Aug; 30(8):4251-4261. PubMed ID: 32211965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prostate cancer localization using multiparametric MR imaging: comparison of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) and Likert scales.
Rosenkrantz AB; Kim S; Lim RP; Hindman N; Deng FM; Babb JS; Taneja SS
Radiology; 2013 Nov; 269(2):482-92. PubMed ID: 23788719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prostate Cancer Detection with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 1 versus Version 2.
Feng ZY; Wang L; Min XD; Wang SG; Wang GP; Cai J
Chin Med J (Engl); 2016 Oct; 129(20):2451-2459. PubMed ID: 27748338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
