160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33882256)
1. Scatter-to-primary ratio in dentomaxillofacial cone-beam CT: effect of field of view and beam energy.
Pauwels R; Pittayapat P; Sinpitaksakul P; Panmekiate S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2021 Dec; 50(8):20200597. PubMed ID: 33882256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cone beam computed tomography radiation dose and image quality assessments.
Lofthag-Hansen S
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2010; (209):4-55. PubMed ID: 21229915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reduction of scatter-induced image noise in cone beam computed tomography: effect of field of view size and position.
Pauwels R; Jacobs R; Bogaerts R; Bosmans H; Panmekiate S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2016 Feb; 121(2):188-95. PubMed ID: 26792756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Convex triangular vs. cylindrical field of view: how does the shape of the FOV affect radiation dose?
Cascante-Sequeira D; Oliveira-Santos C; Brasil DM; Santaella GM; Swanson C; Blackburn M; Scarfe WC; Haiter-Neto F
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Dec; 27(12):7881-7888. PubMed ID: 37993703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Characterization of Scattered X-Ray Photons in Dental Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.
Yang CC
PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0149904. PubMed ID: 26950435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effective radiation dose and eye lens dose in dental cone beam CT: effect of field of view and angle of rotation.
Pauwels R; Zhang G; Theodorakou C; Walker A; Bosmans H; Jacobs R; Bogaerts R; Horner K;
Br J Radiol; 2014 Oct; 87(1042):20130654. PubMed ID: 25189417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of subjective image quality in relation to diagnostic task for cone beam computed tomography with different fields of view.
Lofthag-Hansen S; Thilander-Klang A; Gröndahl K
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):483-8. PubMed ID: 20965675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of Cone-beam Computed Tomography Artifacts Produced by Metal Objects Located Within and Outside the Field of View.
Kassabji A; Tahmasbi M; Augsburger RA; Nair M; Kesterke MJ; Jalali P
J Endod; 2022 Feb; 48(2):249-254. PubMed ID: 34890593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Single-scan patient-specific scatter correction in computed tomography using peripheral detection of scatter and compressed sensing scatter retrieval.
Meng B; Lee H; Xing L; Fahimian BP
Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 40(1):011907. PubMed ID: 23298098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Image quality optimization of narrow detector dental computed tomography for paediatric patients.
Brasil DM; Pauwels R; Coucke W; Haiter-Neto F; Jacobs R
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 Jul; 48(5):20190032. PubMed ID: 30864834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of radiation dose and image quality for dental cone-beam computed tomography in pediatric patients.
Ito M; Chida K; Onodera S; Kojima I; Iikubo M; Kato T; Fujisawa M; Zuguchi M
J Radiol Prot; 2023 Sep; 43(3):. PubMed ID: 37696261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relationship between x-ray illumination field size and flat field intensity and its impacts on x-ray imaging.
Dong X; Niu T; Jia X; Zhu L
Med Phys; 2012 Oct; 39(10):5901-9. PubMed ID: 23039629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Absorbed and effective doses from cone beam volumetric imaging for implant planning.
Okano T; Harata Y; Sugihara Y; Sakaino R; Tsuchida R; Iwai K; Seki K; Araki K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Feb; 38(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 19176649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cone-beam CT imaging with laterally enlarged field of view based on independently movable source and detector.
Karius A; Szkitsak J; Strnad V; Fietkau R; Bert C
Med Phys; 2023 Aug; 50(8):5135-5149. PubMed ID: 37194354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of object location in different FOVs on trabecular bone microstructure measurements of human mandible: a cone beam CT study.
Ibrahim N; Parsa A; Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Aartman IH; Nambiar P
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(2):20130329. PubMed ID: 24265395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Image quality optimization using a narrow vertical detector dental cone-beam CT.
Brasil DM; Pauwels R; Coucke W; Haiter-Neto F; Jacobs R
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 Mar; 48(3):20180357. PubMed ID: 30604636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Scatter correction for cone-beam computed tomography using moving blocker strips: a preliminary study.
Wang J; Mao W; Solberg T
Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5792-800. PubMed ID: 21158291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A novel alignment device for cone beam computed tomography: principle and application.
Dawood A; Sauret-Jackson V; Patel S; Darwood A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Sep; 39(6):375-82. PubMed ID: 20729188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effective dose estimation in cone-beam computed tomography for dental use by Monte-Carlo simulation optimizing calculation numbers using a step-and-shoot method.
Ozaki Y; Watanabe H; Kurabayashi T
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2021 Oct; 50(7):20210084. PubMed ID: 33929892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of scan mode (partial/full rotations) and FOV size in the formation of artefacts in cone beam CT.
Costa EDD; Queiroz PM; Santaella GM; Capelozza ALA; Ambrosano GMB; Freitas DQ
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 May; 48(4):20180340. PubMed ID: 30563362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
