160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33882256)
21. Simulated scatter performance of an inverse-geometry dedicated breast CT system.
Bhagtani R; Schmidt TG
Med Phys; 2009 Mar; 36(3):788-96. PubMed ID: 19378739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Influence of patient position and other inherent factors on image quality in two different cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices.
Lindfors N; Lund H; Johansson H; Ekestubbe A
Eur J Radiol Open; 2017; 4():132-137. PubMed ID: 29159206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Does the shape of the field-of-view influence the magnitude of artefacts from high-density materials in cone-beam computed tomography?
Cascante-Sequeira D; Fontenele RC; Martins LAC; Brasil DM; Oliveira ML; Freitas DQ; Haiter-Neto F
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2023 Oct; 52(7):20230147. PubMed ID: 37493606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The effect of optimum, indication-specific imaging fields on the radiation exposure from CBCT examinations of impacted maxillary canines and mandibular third molars.
Ilo AM; Waltimo-Sirén J; Pakbaznejad Esmaeili E; Ekholm M; Kortesniemi M
Acta Odontol Scand; 2024 Jan; 82(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 38058132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Can modifying shielding, field of view, and exposure settings make the effective dose of a cone-beam computed tomography comparable to traditional radiographs used for orthodontic diagnosis?
Ting S; Attaia D; Johnson KB; Kossa SS; Friedland B; Allareddy V; Masoud MI
Angle Orthod; 2020 Sep; 90(5):655-664. PubMed ID: 33378479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cone beam CT multisource configurations: evaluating image quality, scatter, and dose using phantom imaging and Monte Carlo simulations.
Becker AE; Hernandez AM; Schwoebel PR; Boone JM
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 65(23):235032. PubMed ID: 33080583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cone-beam breast computed tomography with a displaced flat panel detector array.
Mettivier G; Russo P; Lanconelli N; Meo SL
Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2805-19. PubMed ID: 22559652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Influence of cone beam CT scanning parameters on grey value measurements at an implant site.
Parsa A; Ibrahim N; Hassan B; Motroni A; van der Stelt P; Wismeijer D
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(3):79884780. PubMed ID: 22933535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Dosimetry of the cone beam computed tomography Veraviewepocs 3D compared with the 3D Accuitomo in different fields of view.
Hirsch E; Wolf U; Heinicke F; Silva MA
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):268-73. PubMed ID: 18606748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Dosimetry in CBCT with Different Protocols: Emphasis on Small FOVs Including Exams for TMJ.
Nascimento HAR; Andrade MEA; Frazão MAG; Nascimento EHL; Ramos-Perez FMM; Freitas DQ
Braz Dent J; 2017; 28(4):511-516. PubMed ID: 29160405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. High resolution dual detector volume-of-interest cone beam breast CT--Demonstration with a bench top system.
Shen Y; Yi Y; Zhong Y; Lai CJ; Liu X; You Z; Ge S; Wang T; Shaw CC
Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6429-42. PubMed ID: 22149826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Assessment of CBCT gray value in different regions-of-interest and fields-of-view compared to Hounsfield unit.
Yadegari A; Safi Y; Shahbazi S; Yaghoutiazar S; Ghazizadeh Ahsaie M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2023 Nov; 52(8):20230187. PubMed ID: 37874074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cone-beam imaging with tilted rotation axis: Method and performance evaluation.
Zhao C; Herbst M; Vogt S; Ritschl L; Kappler S; Siewerdsen JH; Zbijewski W
Med Phys; 2020 Aug; 47(8):3305-3320. PubMed ID: 32340069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Development and validation of a hybrid simulation technique for cone beam CT: application to an oral imaging system.
Zhang G; Pauwels R; Marshall N; Shaheen E; Nuyts J; Jacobs R; Bosmans H
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Sep; 56(18):5823-43. PubMed ID: 21846936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Modeling and design of a cone-beam CT head scanner using task-based imaging performance optimization.
Xu J; Sisniega A; Zbijewski W; Dang H; Stayman JW; Wang X; Foos DH; Aygun N; Koliatsos VE; Siewerdsen JH
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Apr; 61(8):3180-207. PubMed ID: 27025783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A moving blocker system for cone-beam computed tomography scatter correction.
Ouyang L; Song K; Wang J
Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 40(7):071903. PubMed ID: 23822440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Combining scatter reduction and correction to improve image quality in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).
Jin JY; Ren L; Liu Q; Kim J; Wen N; Guan H; Movsas B; Chetty IJ
Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5634-44. PubMed ID: 21158275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Estimation of the radiation dose for dental spectral cone-beam CT.
Orhan K; Pauwels R; Chen Y; Song D; Jacobs R
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2021 Jul; 50(5):20200372. PubMed ID: 33353401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The effects of compensator and imaging geometry on the distribution of x-ray scatter in CBCT.
Bootsma GJ; Verhaegen F; Jaffray DA
Med Phys; 2011 Feb; 38(2):897-914. PubMed ID: 21452727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of x-ray scatter properties in a dedicated cone-beam breast CT scanner.
Kwan AL; Boone JM; Shah N
Med Phys; 2005 Sep; 32(9):2967-75. PubMed ID: 16266111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
