These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33882402)

  • 1. Knowledge of and trust in advanced driver assistance systems.
    DeGuzman CA; Donmez B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jun; 156():106121. PubMed ID: 33882402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Frequency and Quality of Exposure to Adaptive Cruise Control and Impact on Trust, Workload, and Mental Models.
    Pai G; Zhang F; Hungund AP; Pamarthi J; Roberts SC; Horrey WJ; Pradhan AK
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Sep; 190():107130. PubMed ID: 37336048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors Influencing Trust in Advanced Driver Assistance Systems for Current Users.
    DeGuzman CA; Donmez B
    Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet; 2023 Sep; 67(1):1403-1404. PubMed ID: 38214001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Drivers don't need to learn all ADAS limitations: A comparison of limitation-focused and responsibility-focused training approaches.
    DeGuzman CA; Donmez B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Dec; 178():106871. PubMed ID: 36270108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Beyond adaptive cruise control and lane centering control: drivers' mental model of and trust in emerging ADAS technologies.
    Huang C; He D; Wen X; Yan S
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1236062. PubMed ID: 37614491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Advanced driver assistance systems for teen drivers: Teen and parent impressions, perceived need, and intervention preferences.
    Weiss E; Fisher Thiel M; Sultana N; Hannan C; Seacrist T
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(sup1):S120-S124. PubMed ID: 29584476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceived safety benefits, concerns, and utility of advanced driver assistance systems among owners of ADAS-equipped vehicles.
    Pradhan AK; Pulver E; Zakrajsek J; Bao S; Molnar L
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S135-S137. PubMed ID: 30841806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Driver trust in five driver assistance technologies following real-world use in four production vehicles.
    Kidd DG; Cicchino JB; Reagan IJ; Kerfoot LB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 May; 18(sup1):S44-S50. PubMed ID: 28339302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantifying Vision Zero: Crash avoidance in rural and motorway accident scenarios by combination of ACC, AEB, and LKS projected to German accident occurrence.
    Stark L; Düring M; Schoenawa S; Maschke JE; Do CM
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S126-S132. PubMed ID: 31381430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing the utility of TAM, TPB, and UTAUT for advanced driver assistance systems.
    Rahman MM; Lesch MF; Horrey WJ; Strawderman L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Nov; 108():361-373. PubMed ID: 28957759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Usability testing of three visual HMIs for assisted driving: How design impacts driver distraction and mental models.
    Perrier MJR; Louw TL; Carsten OMJ
    Ergonomics; 2023 Aug; 66(8):1142-1163. PubMed ID: 36259259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Volvo drivers' experiences with advanced crash avoidance and related technologies.
    Eichelberger AH; McCartt AT
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 24345022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Advanced driver assistance systems for teen drivers: A national survey of teen and parent perceptions.
    Hannan C; Palumbo AJ; Fisher Thiel MC; Weiss E; Seacrist T
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S84-S90. PubMed ID: 30335514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Experiences of model year 2011 Dodge and Jeep owners with collision avoidance and related technologies.
    Cicchino JB; McCartt AT
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16():298-303. PubMed ID: 24983299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Toyota drivers' experiences with Dynamic Radar Cruise Control, Pre-Collision System, and Lane-Keeping Assist.
    Eichelberger AH; McCartt AT
    J Safety Res; 2016 Feb; 56():67-73. PubMed ID: 26875167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Driver-initiated take-overs during critical braking maneuvers in automated driving - The role of time headway, traction usage, and trust in automation.
    Becker S; Brandenburg S; Thüring M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106725. PubMed ID: 35878555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-Term Evaluation of Drivers' Behavioral Adaptation to an Adaptive Collision Avoidance System.
    Muslim H; Itoh M
    Hum Factors; 2021 Nov; 63(7):1295-1315. PubMed ID: 32484749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Effects of Vehicle Automation on Driver Engagement: The Case of Adaptive Cruise Control and Mind Wandering.
    Weaver SM; Roldan SM; Gonzalez TB; Balk SA; Philips BH
    Hum Factors; 2022 Sep; 64(6):1086-1098. PubMed ID: 33296230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Training for the safe activation of Automated Vehicles matters: Revealing the benefits of online training to creating glaringly better mental models and behaviour.
    Merriman SE; Revell KMA; Plant KL
    Appl Ergon; 2023 Oct; 112():104057. PubMed ID: 37285640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Trusting Other Vehicles' Automatic Emergency Braking Decreases Self-Protective Driving.
    Kinosada Y; Kobayashi T; Shinohara K
    Hum Factors; 2021 Aug; 63(5):880-895. PubMed ID: 32101470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.