131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33882476)
1. PET-ABC: fully Bayesian likelihood-free inference for kinetic models.
Fan Y; Emvalomenos G; Grazian C; Meikle SR
Phys Med Biol; 2021 May; 66(11):. PubMed ID: 33882476
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. An extended simplified reference tissue model for the quantification of dynamic PET with amphetamine challenge.
Zhou Y; Chen MK; Endres CJ; Ye W; Brasić JR; Alexander M; Crabb AH; Guilarte TR; Wong DF
Neuroimage; 2006 Nov; 33(2):550-63. PubMed ID: 16920365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bayesian Estimation of the ntPET Model in Single-Scan Competition PET Studies.
Irace Z; Mérida I; Redouté J; Fonteneau C; Suaud-Chagny MF; Brunelin J; Vidal B; Zimmer L; Reilhac A; Costes N
Front Physiol; 2020; 11():498. PubMed ID: 32508679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of non-uniform weighting in non-linear regression for pharmacokinetic neuroreceptor modelling.
Thiele F; Buchert R
Nucl Med Commun; 2008 Feb; 29(2):179-88. PubMed ID: 18094641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative assessment of linear least-squares, nonlinear least-squares, and Patlak graphical method for regional and local quantitative tracer kinetic modeling in cerebral dynamic
Ben Bouallègue F; Vauchot F; Mariano-Goulart D
Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1260-1271. PubMed ID: 30592540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of a compartmental model for estimating tumor hypoxia via FMISO dynamic PET imaging.
Wang W; Georgi JC; Nehmeh SA; Narayanan M; Paulus T; Bal M; O'Donoghue J; Zanzonico PB; Schmidtlein CR; Lee NY; Humm JL
Phys Med Biol; 2009 May; 54(10):3083-99. PubMed ID: 19420418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of Bayesian analysis of compartmental kinetic models in medical imaging.
Sitek A; Li Q; El Fakhri G; Alpert NM
Phys Med; 2016 Oct; 32(10):1252-1258. PubMed ID: 27692754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Global-two-stage filtering of clinical PET parametric maps: application to [(11)C]-(R)-PK11195.
Tomasi G; Bertoldo A; Cobelli C; Pavese N; Tai YF; Hammers A; Turkheimer FE
Neuroimage; 2011 Apr; 55(3):942-53. PubMed ID: 21195193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bayesian kinetic modeling for tracer-based metabolomic data.
Zhang X; Su Y; Lane AN; Stromberg AJ; Fan TWM; Wang C
BMC Bioinformatics; 2023 Mar; 24(1):108. PubMed ID: 36949395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Consequences of using a simplified kinetic model for dynamic PET data.
Coxson PG; Huesman RH; Borland L
J Nucl Med; 1997 Apr; 38(4):660-7. PubMed ID: 9098221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficient exact inference for dynamical systems with noisy measurements using sequential approximate Bayesian computation.
Schälte Y; Hasenauer J
Bioinformatics; 2020 Jul; 36(Suppl_1):i551-i559. PubMed ID: 32657404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Bayesian spatial temporal mixtures approach to kinetic parametric images in dynamic positron emission tomography.
Zhu W; Ouyang J; Rakvongthai Y; Guehl NJ; Wooten DW; El Fakhri G; Normandin MD; Fan Y
Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 43(3):1222-34. PubMed ID: 26936707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computation of variance in compartment model parameter estimates from dynamic PET data.
Kamasak ME
Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2638-48. PubMed ID: 22559634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing Reliability of Myocardial Blood Flow After Motion Correction With Dynamic PET Using a Bayesian Framework.
Saillant A; Armstrong I; Shah V; Zuehlsdorff S; Hayden C; Declerck J; Saint K; Memmott M; Jenkinson M; Chappell MA
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2019 May; 38(5):1216-1226. PubMed ID: 30452353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Approximate Bayesian computation.
Sunnåker M; Busetto AG; Numminen E; Corander J; Foll M; Dessimoz C
PLoS Comput Biol; 2013; 9(1):e1002803. PubMed ID: 23341757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimized in vivo detection of dopamine release using 18F-fallypride PET.
Ceccarini J; Vrieze E; Koole M; Muylle T; Bormans G; Claes S; Van Laere K
J Nucl Med; 2012 Oct; 53(10):1565-72. PubMed ID: 22933820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. PET kinetic analysis: error consideration of quantitative analysis in dynamic studies.
Ikoma Y; Watabe H; Shidahara M; Naganawa M; Kimura Y
Ann Nucl Med; 2008 Jan; 22(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 18250982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Compartment modeling of dynamic brain PET--the impact of scatter corrections on parameter errors.
Häggström I; Schmidtlein CR; Karlsson M; Larsson A
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111907. PubMed ID: 25370640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estimation of evolutionary parameters using short, random and partial sequences from mixed samples of anonymous individuals.
Wu SH; Rodrigo AG
BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Nov; 16():357. PubMed ID: 26536860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tyrosine-free amino acid mixture attenuates amphetamine-induced displacement of [11C]raclopride in striatum in vivo: a rat PET study.
Le Masurier M; Houston G; Cowen P; Grasby P; Sharp T; Hume S
Synapse; 2004 Feb; 51(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 14618682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
