These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
393 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33882936)
1. Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis. Piszczek R; Nowak Ł; Krajewski W; Chorbińska J; Poletajew S; Moschini M; Kaliszewski K; Zdrojowy R World J Surg Oncol; 2021 Apr; 19(1):129. PubMed ID: 33882936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy is associated with worse survival outcomes than open radical nephroureterectomy in patients with locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Kim HS; Ku JH; Jeong CW; Kwak C; Kim HH World J Urol; 2016 Jun; 34(6):859-69. PubMed ID: 26497823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of oncological outcomes for open and laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy: results from the Canadian Upper Tract Collaboration. Fairey AS; Kassouf W; Estey E; Tanguay S; Rendon R; Bell D; Izawa J; Chin J; Kapoor A; Matsumoto E; Black P; So A; Lattouf JB; Saad F; Drachenberg D; Cagiannos I; Lacombe L; Fradet Y; Jacobsen NE BJU Int; 2013 Oct; 112(6):791-7. PubMed ID: 23148712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Oncological Outcomes of Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy Versus Open Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: An European Association of Urology Guidelines Systematic Review. Peyronnet B; Seisen T; Dominguez-Escrig JL; Bruins HM; Yuan CY; Lam T; Maclennan S; N'dow J; Babjuk M; Comperat E; Zigeuner R; Sylvester RJ; Burger M; Mostafid H; van Rhijn BWG; Gontero P; Palou J; Shariat SF; Roupret M Eur Urol Focus; 2019 Mar; 5(2):205-223. PubMed ID: 29154042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Open Radical Nephroureterectomy for Patients with T3N0M0 Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Multicenter Cohort Study with Adjustment by Propensity Score Matching. Shigeta K; Kikuchi E; Abe T; Hagiwara M; Ogihara K; Anno T; Umeda K; Baba Y; Sanjo T; Shojo K; Mizuno R; Oya M Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Oct; 26(11):3774-3781. PubMed ID: 31313043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative study of lymph node dissection, and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic and open radical nephroureterectomy for patients with urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract undergoing regional lymph node dissection. Abe T; Kondo T; Harabayashi T; Takada N; Matsumoto R; Osawa T; Minami K; Nagamori S; Maruyama S; Murai S; Tanabe K; Shinohara N Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2018 Nov; 48(11):1001-1011. PubMed ID: 30272169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing oncological outcomes of laparoscopic vs open radical nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis. Moschini M; Zamboni S; Afferi L; Pradere B; Abufaraj M; Soria F; D'Andrea D; Roupret M; De la Taille A; Simeone C; Mattei A; Mathieu R; Bensalah K; Wirth MP; Montorsi F; Briganti A; Gallina A; Simone G; Gallucci M; Di Bona C; Marra G; Mari A; Di Trapani E; Alvarez Maestro M; Krajewski W; Shariat SF; Xylinas E; Baumeister P Arab J Urol; 2020 Sep; 19(1):31-36. PubMed ID: 33763246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy to treat localized and/or locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma: oncological outcomes from a multicenter study. Liu JY; Dai YB; Zhou FJ; Long Z; Li YH; Xie D; Liu B; Tang J; Tan J; Yao K; He LY BMC Surg; 2017 Jan; 17(1):8. PubMed ID: 28095848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Oncologic Outcomes of Kidney-sparing Surgery Versus Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review by the EAU Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel. Seisen T; Peyronnet B; Dominguez-Escrig JL; Bruins HM; Yuan CY; Babjuk M; Böhle A; Burger M; Compérat EM; Cowan NC; Kaasinen E; Palou J; van Rhijn BW; Sylvester RJ; Zigeuner R; Shariat SF; Rouprêt M Eur Urol; 2016 Dec; 70(6):1052-1068. PubMed ID: 27477528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intraoperative prognostic factors and atypical patterns of recurrence in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma treated with laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy. Carrion A; Huguet J; García-Cruz E; Izquierdo L; Mateu L; Musquera M; Ribal MJ; Alcaraz A Scand J Urol; 2016 Aug; 50(4):305-12. PubMed ID: 26926709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laparoscopic Versus Open Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Propensity-Score Matched Studies. Deng S; Liu L; Wang Y; Zhou C; Zhang H Surg Innov; 2024 Oct; 31(5):520-529. PubMed ID: 39101895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A systematic review and meta-analysis of oncological and renal function outcomes obtained after segmental ureterectomy versus radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Fang D; Seisen T; Yang K; Liu P; Fan X; Singla N; Xiong G; Zhang L; Li X; Zhou L Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Nov; 42(11):1625-1635. PubMed ID: 27612412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Single-docking robotic-assisted nephroureterectomy and extravesical bladder cuff excision without intraoperative repositioning: The technique and oncological outcomes. Ye H; Feng X; Wang Y; Chen R; Zhang C; Zhang W; Guo F; Wang Z; Fang Y; Wu Z; Yang Q; Yang B; Lü C; Wang L Asian J Surg; 2020 Oct; 43(10):978-985. PubMed ID: 31941594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating the Oncological Outcomes of Pure Laparoscopic Radical Nephroureterectomy Performed for Upper-Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Patients: A Multicenter Cohort Study Adjusted by Propensity Score Matching. Shigeta K; Matsumoto K; Takeda T; Hattori S; Kaneko G; Matsushima M; Abe T; Tanaka N; Mizuno R; Asanuma H; Kikuchi E; Oya M Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Jan; 28(1):465-473. PubMed ID: 32840743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Concomitant carcinoma in situ as a prognostic factor in the upper tract urothelial carcinoma after radical nephroureterectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gao X; Ma Y; Chen G; Chen J; Li H; Li H; Wei X; Wang K Urol Oncol; 2020 Jun; 38(6):574-581. PubMed ID: 32273049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing Oncological and Perioperative Outcomes of Open versus Laparoscopic versus Robotic Radical Nephroureterectomy for the Treatment of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Multicenter, Multinational, Propensity Score-Matched Analysis. Grossmann NC; Soria F; Juvet T; Potretzke AM; Djaladat H; Ghoreifi A; Kikuchi E; Mari A; Khene ZE; Fujita K; Raman JD; Breda A; Fontana M; Sfakianos JP; Pfail JL; Laukhtina E; Rajwa P; Pallauf M; Poyet C; Cacciamani GE; van Doeveren T; Boormans JL; Antonelli A; Jamil M; Abdollah F; Ploussard G; Heidenreich A; Storz E; Daneshmand S; Boorjian SA; Rouprêt M; Rink M; Shariat SF; Pradere B Cancers (Basel); 2023 Feb; 15(5):. PubMed ID: 36900201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laparoscopy versus Open Nephroureterectomy in Prognostic Outcome of Patients with Advanced Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer: A Retrospective, Multicenter, Propensity-Score Matching Analysis. Kim SH; Song MK; Kim JK; Hong B; Kang SH; Ku JH; Jeong BC; Seo HK Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Jul; 51(3):963-972. PubMed ID: 30322230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparative study of different surgical techniques for the management of distal ureter during laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy. Carrion A; Ribal MJ; Morote J; Huguet J; Raventós C; Lozano F; Costa-Grau M; Alcaraz A Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2019 Dec; 43(10):543-550. PubMed ID: 31447089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of Complete Bladder Cuff Removal on Oncological Outcomes Following Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Ryoo H; Kim J; Kim T; Kang M; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Lee HM; Sung HH Cancer Res Treat; 2021 Jul; 53(3):795-802. PubMed ID: 33421984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robotic versus other nephroureterectomy techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 87,000 cases. Veccia A; Antonelli A; Francavilla S; Simeone C; Guruli G; Zargar H; Perdoná S; Ferro M; Carrieri G; Hampton LJ; Porpiglia F; Autorino R World J Urol; 2020 Apr; 38(4):845-852. PubMed ID: 31773242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]