These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33883413)

  • 1. Quantitative Sensory Testing in Women After Surgery for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.
    Dams L; Van der Gucht E; Meeus M; Devoogdt N; Smeets A; Penen F; De Baerdemaecker T; Haenen V; Bernar K; De Vrieze T; De Groef A
    Clin J Pain; 2021 Jul; 37(7):538-564. PubMed ID: 33883413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Absolute and Relative Reliability of a Comprehensive Quantitative Sensory Testing Protocol in Women Treated for Breast Cancer.
    Dams L; Haenen V; Van der Gucht E; Devoogdt N; Smeets A; Bernar K; De Vrieze T; De Groef A; Meeus M
    Pain Med; 2022 May; 23(6):1162-1175. PubMed ID: 34908144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantitative sensory testing: identifying pain characteristics in patients with osteoarthritis.
    Arant KR; Katz JN; Neogi T
    Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2022 Jan; 30(1):17-31. PubMed ID: 34597800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Continuum of somatosensory profiles in breast cancer survivors with and without pain, compared to healthy controls and patients with fibromyalgia.
    Haenen V; Dams L; Meeus M; Devoogdt N; Morlion B; De Groote A; De Groef A
    Eur J Pain; 2024 Aug; 28(7):1226-1241. PubMed ID: 38440910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Questionnaire-based somatosensory profiling in breast cancer survivors: are we there yet? Associations between questionnaires and quantitative sensory testing.
    Dams L; Van der Gucht E; Haenen V; Devoogdt N; Smeets A; Morlion B; Bernar K; De Vrieze T; Moloney N; De Groef A; Meeus M
    Disabil Rehabil; 2023 Jun; 45(11):1865-1876. PubMed ID: 35617510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability and minimal detectable change of dynamic temporal summation and conditioned pain modulation using a single experimental paradigm.
    Vincenot M; Beaulieu LD; Gendron L; Marchand S; Léonard G
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(7):e0307556. PubMed ID: 39052569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The interrater and test-retest reliability of 3 modalities of quantitative sensory testing in healthy adults and people with chronic low back pain or rheumatoid arthritis.
    Brady SM; Georgopoulos V; Veldhuijzen van Zanten JJCS; Duda JL; Metsios GS; Kitas GD; Fenton SAM; Walsh DA; McWilliams DF
    Pain Rep; 2023 Dec; 8(6):e1102. PubMed ID: 37829138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do chronic low back pain subgroups derived from dynamic quantitative sensory testing exhibit differing multidimensional profiles?
    Rabey M; Kendell M; Koren S; Silva I; Watts L; Wong C; Slater H; Smith A; Beales D
    Scand J Pain; 2021 Jul; 21(3):474-484. PubMed ID: 33639047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The long-term reliability of static and dynamic quantitative sensory testing in healthy individuals.
    Marcuzzi A; Wrigley PJ; Dean CM; Adams R; Hush JM
    Pain; 2017 Jul; 158(7):1217-1223. PubMed ID: 28328574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Test-retest agreement and reliability of quantitative sensory testing 1 year after breast cancer surgery.
    Andersen KG; Kehlet H; Aasvang EK
    Clin J Pain; 2015 May; 31(5):393-403. PubMed ID: 25084072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are preoperative experimental pain assessments correlated with clinical pain outcomes after surgery? A systematic review.
    Sangesland A; Støren C; Vaegter HB
    Scand J Pain; 2017 Apr; 15():44-52. PubMed ID: 28850344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hand-arm vibration syndrome: clinical characteristics, conventional electrophysiology and quantitative sensory testing.
    Rolke R; Rolke S; Vogt T; Birklein F; Geber C; Treede RD; Letzel S; Voelter-Mahlknecht S
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2013 Aug; 124(8):1680-8. PubMed ID: 23507585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Concurrent validity of a low-cost and time-efficient clinical sensory test battery to evaluate somatosensory dysfunction.
    Zhu GC; Böttger K; Slater H; Cook C; Farrell SF; Hailey L; Tampin B; Schmid AB
    Eur J Pain; 2019 Nov; 23(10):1826-1838. PubMed ID: 31325385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Correlation of Fibromyalgia Survey Questionnaire and Quantitative Sensory Testing Among Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis.
    Moore MN; Wallace BI; Song J; Muhammad LN; Heisler AC; Clauw DJ; Bolster MB; Marder W; Neogi T; Wohlfahrt A; Dunlop DD; Lee YC
    J Rheumatol; 2022 Sep; 49(9):1052-1057. PubMed ID: 35649554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sensory profiles in women with neuropathic pain after breast cancer surgery.
    Mustonen L; Vollert J; Rice ASC; Kalso E; Harno H
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Jul; 182(2):305-315. PubMed ID: 32458104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Psychometric properties of quantitative sensory testing in healthy and patients with shoulder pain: A systematic review.
    Bilika P; Paliouras A; Savvoulidou K; Arribas-Romano A; Dimitriadis Z; Billis E; Strimpakos N; Kapreli E
    J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact; 2023 Mar; 23(1):145-164. PubMed ID: 36856109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Association of quantitative sensory testing parameters with clinical outcome in patients with lumbar radiculopathy undergoing microdiscectomy.
    Tampin B; Slater H; Jacques A; Lind CRP
    Eur J Pain; 2020 Aug; 24(7):1377-1392. PubMed ID: 32383177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of conditioned pain modulation on trigeminal somatosensory function evaluated by quantitative sensory testing.
    Oono Y; Baad-Hansen L; Wang K; Arendt-Nielsen L; Svensson P
    Pain; 2013 Dec; 154(12):2684-2690. PubMed ID: 23911699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pain Mechanisms in Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis of Mechanical Quantitative Sensory Testing Outcomes in People With Nonspecific Low Back Pain.
    den Bandt HL; Paulis WD; Beckwée D; Ickmans K; Nijs J; Voogt L
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2019 Oct; 49(10):698-715. PubMed ID: 31443625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative sensory testing (QST). English version.
    Mücke M; Cuhls H; Radbruch L; Baron R; Maier C; Tölle T; Treede RD; Rolke R
    Schmerz; 2021 Nov; 35(Suppl 3):153-160. PubMed ID: 26826097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.