These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33884471)

  • 1. Comparisons between image quality and diagnostic performance of 2D- and breath-hold 3D magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography at 3T.
    Yoen H; Lee JM; Lee SM; Kang HJ; Bae JS; Kim E; Peeters JM; Yoon JH
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Nov; 31(11):8399-8407. PubMed ID: 33884471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rapid 3D breath-hold MR cholangiopancreatography using deep learning-constrained compressed sensing reconstruction.
    Zhang Y; Peng W; Xiao Y; Ming Y; Ma K; Hu S; Zeng W; Zeng L; Liang Z; Zhang X; Xia C; Li Z
    Eur Radiol; 2023 Apr; 33(4):2500-2509. PubMed ID: 36355200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. GRASE Revisited: breath-hold three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography using a Gradient and Spin Echo (GRASE) technique at 3T.
    Nam JG; Lee JM; Kang HJ; Lee SM; Kim E; Peeters JM; Yoon JH
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Sep; 28(9):3721-3728. PubMed ID: 29392471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison between gradient and spin-echo (GRASE) and compressed sensing sequences for single breath-hold three-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with T
    Morimoto-Ishikawa D; Hyodo T; Takenaka M; Matsukubo Y; Numoto I; Itoh M; Ohmi M; Kamata K; Ueda Y; Wakana M; Kudo M; Saito S; Ishii K
    Eur J Radiol; 2022 May; 150():110279. PubMed ID: 35364450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modified breath-hold compressed-sensing 3D MR cholangiopancreatography with a small field-of-view and high resolution acquisition: Clinical feasibility in biliary and pancreatic disorders.
    Zhu L; Xue H; Sun Z; Qian T; Weiland E; Kuehn B; Asbach P; Hamm B; Jin Z
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Nov; 48(5):1389-1399. PubMed ID: 29656611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical Feasibility of 3-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography Using Compressed Sensing: Comparison of Image Quality and Diagnostic Performance.
    Yoon JH; Lee SM; Kang HJ; Weiland E; Raithel E; Son Y; Kiefer B; Lee JM
    Invest Radiol; 2017 Oct; 52(10):612-619. PubMed ID: 28448309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Breath-hold compressed-sensing 3D MR cholangiopancreatography compared to free-breathing 3D MR cholangiopancreatography: prospective study of image quality and diagnostic performance in pancreatic disorders.
    Mannes I; Dallongeville A; Badat N; Beaussier H; Chatellier G; Zins M
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Apr; 45(4):1082-1091. PubMed ID: 31598763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography at 3T in a single breath-hold: comparative effectiveness between three-dimensional (3D) gradient- and spin-echo and two-dimensional (2D) thick-slab fast spin-echo acquisitions.
    Chien CP; Chiu FM; Shen YC; Chen YH; Chung HW
    Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2020 Jun; 10(6):1265-1274. PubMed ID: 32550135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison and evaluation of the efficacy of compressed SENSE (CS) and gradient- and spin-echo (GRASE) in breath-hold (BH) magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP).
    He M; Xu J; Sun Z; Wang S; Zhu L; Wang X; Wang J; Feng F; Xue H; Jin Z
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Mar; 51(3):824-832. PubMed ID: 31313426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical Evaluation of Respiratory-triggered 3D MRCP with Navigator Echoes Compared to Breath-hold Acquisition Using Compressed Sensing and/or Parallel Imaging.
    Kromrey ML; Funayama S; Tamada D; Ichikawa S; Shimizu T; Onishi H; Motosugi U
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2020 Dec; 19(4):318-323. PubMed ID: 31645536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography at 3 Tesla: Image quality comparison between 3D compressed sensing and 2D single-shot acquisitions.
    Lohöfer FK; Kaissis GA; Rasper M; Katemann C; Hock A; Peeters JM; Schlag C; Rummeny EJ; Karampinos D; Braren RF
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jun; 115():53-58. PubMed ID: 31084759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Compressed-Sensing Accelerated 3-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography: Application in Suspected Pancreatic Diseases.
    Zhu L; Wu X; Sun Z; Jin Z; Weiland E; Raithel E; Qian T; Xue H
    Invest Radiol; 2018 Mar; 53(3):150-157. PubMed ID: 28976478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing compressed sensing breath-hold 3D MR cholangiopancreatography with two parallel imaging MRCP strategies in main pancreatic duct and common bile duct.
    Chen Z; Sun B; Xue Y; Duan Q; Zheng E; He Y; Li G; Zhang Z
    Eur J Radiol; 2021 Sep; 142():109833. PubMed ID: 34218123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of respiratory-triggered 3D MR cholangiopancreatography and breath-hold compressed-sensing 3D MR cholangiopancreatography at 1.5 T and 3 T and impact of individual factors on image quality.
    Blaise H; Remen T; Ambarki K; Weiland E; Kuehn B; Orry X; Laurent V
    Eur J Radiol; 2021 Sep; 142():109873. PubMed ID: 34371309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Compressed Sensing and Gradient and Spin-Echo in Breath-Hold 3D MR Cholangiopancreatography: Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis.
    Jang W; Song JS; Kim SH; Yang JD
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 Apr; 11(4):. PubMed ID: 33915832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Feasibility of 3D Breath-Hold MR Cholangiopancreatography with a Spatially Selective Radiofrequency Excitation Pulse: Prospective Comparison with Parallel Imaging Technique and Compressed Sensing Method.
    Chen Z; Xue Y; Wu Y; Duan Q; Zheng E; He Y; Li G; Song Y; Sun B
    Acad Radiol; 2022 Dec; 29(12):e289-e295. PubMed ID: 35370045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with GRASE sequence at 3.0T: does it improve image quality and acquisition time as compared with 3D TSE?
    Yoshida M; Nakaura T; Inoue T; Tanoue S; Takada S; Utsunomiya D; Tsumagari S; Harada K; Yamashita Y
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Jun; 28(6):2436-2443. PubMed ID: 29335869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with compressed sensing at 1.5 T: clinical application for the evaluation of branch duct IPMN of the pancreas.
    Henninger B; Steurer M; Plaikner M; Weiland E; Jaschke W; Kremser C
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6014-6021. PubMed ID: 32556465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography using optimized integrated combination with parallel imaging and compressed sensing technique.
    Nagata S; Goshima S; Noda Y; Kawai N; Kajita K; Kawada H; Tanahashi Y; Matsuo M
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 May; 44(5):1766-1772. PubMed ID: 30659308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating the Quality of Optimal MRCP Image Using RT-2D-Compressed SENSE(CS)Turbo Spin Echo: Comparing Respiratory Triggering(RT)-2D-SENSE Turbo Spin Echo and Breath Hold-2D-Single-Shot Turbo Spin Echo.
    Goo EH; Kim SS
    Tomography; 2022 May; 8(3):1374-1385. PubMed ID: 35645397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.